Chris Wakefield wrote:
Greetings all.
I'm planning to build my next power machine, this time I
may go with a Core Duo, but I looking for some suggestions
and CPU stories from Y'all
To my dissappointment my 'AMD 64 X2 Dual Core 3800' has
been a ho-hum experience; don't know if it's the s
On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 02:13:08PM -0500, Karl Schmidt wrote:
> Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
>
> >The only problem I had with JFS was what I have with all
> >metadata-journal-only: I don't have a UPS and some files would go
> >missing.
>
> ?? simply turn on autosave in your application.. or dig throug
Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 10:20:28PM -0500, Karl Schmidt wrote:
Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
I had great success with JFS except that I switch away from it when told
by the maintainer that IBM didn't recommend using it anymore.
Could that be that they want you to use somethi
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 10:20:28PM -0500, Karl Schmidt wrote:
> Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
>
> >
> >I had great success with JFS except that I switch away from it when told
> >by the maintainer that IBM didn't recommend using it anymore.
>
> Could that be that they want you to use something they m
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 12:41:05PM +1000, Dean Hamstead wrote:
> UPS's are way cheap. You should just grab a generic one from somewhere.
> Chances are NUT will support it. It supported one I bought as an impulse
> by from a local supermarket!
I (and many others) have gotten the APC SU1500VA on sa
Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 11:20:25PM -0700, Chris Wakefield wrote:
To my dissappointment my 'AMD 64 X2 Dual Core 3800' has
been a ho-hum experience; don't know if it's the scheduler
with the default debian compile that seems to effect the
performance, but it's certainl
Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
I had great success with JFS except that I switch away from it when told
by the maintainer that IBM didn't recommend using it anymore.
Could that be that they want you to use something they make that you have to pay for? IBM isn't
supporting it, but it is supported
UPS's are way cheap. You should just grab a generic one from somewhere.
Chances are NUT will support it. It supported one I bought as an impulse
by from a local supermarket!
Dean
I use ext3 with data=journal mode since the power goes out here and I
don't have a UPS. With default mode, only t
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 12:04:32PM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> > Truly have found ext3 to be ho-hum, but I guess that's the
> > point;^)
>
> It's reliable, the performance is decent.
>
> I tried XFS for a while, but that was around 2.6.10, and there were some
> serious bugs at the tim
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 11:20:25PM -0700, Chris Wakefield wrote:
> To my dissappointment my 'AMD 64 X2 Dual Core 3800' has
> been a ho-hum experience; don't know if it's the scheduler
> with the default debian compile that seems to effect the
> performance, but it's certainly nothing to write ho
Im running XFS on my desktop and laptop
So far so good.
Dean
Allan Wind wrote:
On 2008-06-12T08:05:28-0700, Chris Wakefield wrote:
Don't want to start a war, but I'd like to hear about your
filesystem suggestions:^)
I use ext3 and have no reason to consider anything else. reiser is the
On 2008-06-12T08:05:28-0700, Chris Wakefield wrote:
> Don't want to start a war, but I'd like to hear about your
> filesystem suggestions:^)
I use ext3 and have no reason to consider anything else. reiser is the
only file system that I have lost data with.
/Allan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 08:05:28AM -0700, Chris Wakefield wrote:
> Thanks for the replies so far.
>
> Don't want to start a war, but I'd like to hear about your
> filesystem suggestions:^)
I use ext3. I might go to ext4 the day it is done.
> Seriously thinking of going with Reiser4. I've
On Thu, 2008-06-12 at 08:05 -0700, Chris Wakefield wrote:
> On June 11, 2008 11:20:25 pm Chris Wakefield wrote:
> > Greetings all.
> >
> > I'm planning to build my next power machine, this time I
> > may go with a Core Duo, but I looking for some
> > suggestions and CPU stories from Y'all
> >
>
On June 11, 2008 11:20:25 pm Chris Wakefield wrote:
> Greetings all.
>
> I'm planning to build my next power machine, this time I
> may go with a Core Duo, but I looking for some
> suggestions and CPU stories from Y'all
>
> To my dissappointment my 'AMD 64 X2 Dual Core 3800' has
> been a ho-hum
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 07:15:09AM -0400, C. Ahlstrom wrote:
> I've had the opposite experience (AMD being a bit faster). However,
> three things:
>
>1. Tweak and build my own kernel, setting scheduler parameters. (Any
> apparent performance increase may be dumb luck, thouhg.)
>
>
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 11:20:25PM -0700, Chris Wakefield wrote:
> Greetings all.
>
> I'm planning to build my next power machine, this time I
> may go with a Core Duo, but I looking for some suggestions
> and CPU stories from Y'all
>
> To my dissappointment my 'AMD 64 X2 Dual Core 3800' ha
Dean Hamstead 18:28 Thu 12 Jun
intel cpus are smashing AMD cpus except in the very low end market
you are best off buying an intel quad core... sadly.
Chris Wakefield wrote:
To my dissappointment my 'AMD 64 X2 Dual Core 3800' has been a ho-hum
experience; don't know if
intel cpus are smashing AMD cpus except in the very low end market
you are best off buying an intel quad core... sadly.
Dean
Chris Wakefield wrote:
Greetings all.
I'm planning to build my next power machine, this time I
may go with a Core Duo, but I looking for some suggestions
and CPU stor
Greetings all.
I'm planning to build my next power machine, this time I
may go with a Core Duo, but I looking for some suggestions
and CPU stories from Y'all
To my dissappointment my 'AMD 64 X2 Dual Core 3800' has
been a ho-hum experience; don't know if it's the scheduler
with the default
20 matches
Mail list logo
