Re: Kernel-2.6.10 and 32bit emulation

2005-01-06 Thread Maurice
Ryan Lovett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Aritz Beraza Garayalde [Rei] wrote: > > If you google a bit, you'll be able to find some amd64 packages for > > mplayer, also from marillat. Thanks, I've seen that. Unfortunately the 32bit-version of mplayer is still needed because of the (binary only) w32c

Re: Kernel-2.6.10 and 32bit emulation

2005-01-05 Thread Frank Remetter
Hey, > If you google a bit, you'll be able to find some amd64 packages for > mplayer, also from marillat. Unfortunately last time i checked, there > was no debian repository, so you can't install them by adding a few > lines to your sources.list and using apt. You'll have to get all > needed packa

Re: Kernel-2.6.10 and 32bit emulation

2005-01-05 Thread Ryan Lovett
On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 02:30:27AM +0100, Aritz Beraza Garayalde [Rei] wrote: > If you google a bit, you'll be able to find some amd64 packages for > mplayer, also from marillat. Unfortunately last time i checked, there > was no debian repository, so you can't install them by adding a few > lines t

Re: Kernel-2.6.10 and 32bit emulation

2005-01-05 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 02:30:27AM +0100, Aritz Beraza Garayalde [Rei] wrote: > > If you google a bit, you'll be able to find some amd64 packages for > mplayer, also from marillat. Unfortunately last time i checked, there > was no debian repository, so you can't install them by adding a few > line

Re: Kernel-2.6.10 and 32bit emulation

2005-01-05 Thread Peter Nelson
Aritz Beraza Garayalde [Rei] wrote: If you google a bit, you'll be able to find some amd64 packages for mplayer, also from marillat. Unfortunately last time i checked, there was no debian repository, so you can't install them by adding a few lines to your sources.list and using apt. You'll have to

Re: Kernel-2.6.10 and 32bit emulation

2005-01-05 Thread David Liontooth
Aritz Beraza Garayalde [Rei] wrote: Hi, Sythos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I read on kernel 2.6.10 changelog that 32bit emulation is widely improved... This change something in amd64 situation? using that kernel I had the problem that mplayer-32bit (from marillat) totally freezes up my s

Re: Kernel-2.6.10 and 32bit emulation

2005-01-05 Thread Aritz Beraza Garayalde [Rei]
> Hi, > > Sythos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I read on kernel 2.6.10 changelog that 32bit emulation is widely > > improved... > > > > This change something in amd64 situation? > > using that kernel I had the problem that mplayer-32bit (from marillat) > totally freezes up my system. No matter i

Re: Kernel-2.6.10 and 32bit emulation

2005-01-05 Thread Maurice
Hi, Sythos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I read on kernel 2.6.10 changelog that 32bit emulation is widely > improved... > > This change something in amd64 situation? using that kernel I had the problem that mplayer-32bit (from marillat) totally freezes up my system. No matter if called from the c

Re: Kernel-2.6.10 and 32bit emulation

2005-01-05 Thread Hugo Mills
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 05:25:10PM +0100, Sythos wrote: > I read on kernel 2.6.10 changelog that 32bit emulation is widely > improved... > > This change something in amd64 situation? Somebody has tried to run > 32bit apps without chroot (apps that to 2.6.9 don't run in 32bit > emulaiton of 64bit k

Re: Kernel-2.6.10 and 32bit emulation

2005-01-05 Thread lore
> I read on kernel 2.6.10 changelog that 32bit emulation is widely > improved... > > This change something in amd64 situation? Somebody has tried to run > 32bit apps without chroot (apps that to 2.6.9 don't run in 32bit > emulaiton of 64bit kernel)? I run Skype in the 64bit system, but it was wor

Kernel-2.6.10 and 32bit emulation

2005-01-05 Thread Sythos
Hi all I read on kernel 2.6.10 changelog that 32bit emulation is widely improved... This change something in amd64 situation? Somebody has tried to run 32bit apps without chroot (apps that to 2.6.9 don't run in 32bit emulaiton of 64bit kernel)? Regards Sythos -- Sythos - http://www.sy