Re: Openoffice 2.0.1

2006-01-12 Thread Santiago Kci
> Thanks in advance.>> Santiago.>it has to be a joke :)no ? hmm ...MikPS: hint : look at the end of your/my mail ...> 2006/1/10, Emmanuel Fleury < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>>:>> Hi all, >> I have some problem to build the debian package of

Re: Openoffice 2.0.1

2006-01-12 Thread Santiago Kci
he end of your/my mail ...> 2006/1/10, Emmanuel Fleury < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>>:>> Hi all,>> I have some problem to build the debian package of OpenOffice 2.0.1.>> Here is what I do:>> 1) Add the experimental repository in

Re: Openoffice 2.0.1

2006-01-11 Thread Mickael Marchand
Anthony DeRobertis a écrit : > Mickael Marchand wrote: > >> any tips are welcome to fix this ... >> >> might be a bug in the control file of the pkgs maybe ? > > Often, this is caused by a mismatch of e.g., Installed-Size between the > .deb and the Packages file. Normally, this would only happen

Re: Openoffice 2.0.1

2006-01-11 Thread Mickael Marchand
TECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>: > > Hi all, > > I have some problem to build the debian package of OpenOffice 2.0.1. > > Here is what I do: > > 1) Add the experimental repository in my /etc/apt/sources.list: > > # Debian Expe

Re: Openoffice 2.0.1

2006-01-11 Thread Anthony DeRobertis
Mickael Marchand wrote: > any tips are welcome to fix this ... > > might be a bug in the control file of the pkgs maybe ? Often, this is caused by a mismatch of e.g., Installed-Size between the .deb and the Packages file. Normally, this would only happen with locally built packages but you m

Re: Openoffice 2.0.1

2006-01-11 Thread Santiago Kci
Where can I find the patch "compile_openoffice_x86_64.diff"?Thanks in advance.Santiago.2006/1/10, Emmanuel Fleury < [EMAIL PROTECTED]>:Hi all,I have some problem to build the debian package of OpenOffice 2.0.1.Here is what I do:1) Add the experimental repository in my /etc/

Re: Openoffice 2.0.1

2006-01-11 Thread Jack Malmostoso
On Wed, 11 Jan 2006 08:10:14 +0100, Emmanuel Fleury wrote: > It sounds like a nice first bug report to write to the OO people ! ;-) Posted issue #60373: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60373 Please try to confirm the bug! -- Best Regards, Jack Linux User #264449 Powered by De

Re: Openoffice 2.0.1

2006-01-11 Thread Mickael Marchand
Rafael Rodríguez wrote: > mmm... mikmak, one question... Now, everytime i do an upgrade, apt > keeps upgrading > > openoffice.org-common openoffice.org-java-common openoffice.org-l10n-en-us > > all the time, to the same versions... How can i avoid that? why is this? > > Rafael Rodríguez > good

Re: Openoffice 2.0.1

2006-01-11 Thread Rafael Rodríguez
mmm... mikmak, one question... Now, everytime i do an upgrade, apt keeps upgrading openoffice.org-common openoffice.org-java-common openoffice.org-l10n-en-us all the time, to the same versions... How can i avoid that? why is this? Rafael Rodríguez

Re: Openoffice 2.0.1

2006-01-10 Thread Emmanuel Fleury
Jack Malmostoso wrote: > > I can reopen a saved file from 64bit OO.o Writer, but not one made with a > 32bit version. It sounds like a nice first bug report to write to the OO people ! ;-) Regards -- Emmanuel Fleury In the beginning the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people very a

Re: Openoffice 2.0.1

2006-01-10 Thread Jack Malmostoso
On Tue, 10 Jan 2006 22:50:14 +0100, Mickael Marchand wrote: > indeed, I can't reopen a saved file I can reopen a saved file from 64bit OO.o Writer, but not one made with a 32bit version. -- Best Regards, Jack Linux User #264449 Powered by Debian GNU/Linux on AMD64 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Re: Openoffice 2.0.1

2006-01-10 Thread Mickael Marchand
sigi wrote: > On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 06:08:46PM +0100, Mickael Marchand wrote: > >>wow, what a surprise ! >> >>I've built the packages using your patch, and openoffice compile and >>_works_ just fine >>(I initially just wanted to see what was broken ;) > > > > Here on my computer OOo2 has a lo

Re: Openoffice 2.0.1

2006-01-10 Thread sigi
On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 06:08:46PM +0100, Mickael Marchand wrote: > wow, what a surprise ! > > I've built the packages using your patch, and openoffice compile and > _works_ just fine > (I initially just wanted to see what was broken ;) Here on my computer OOo2 has a lot of problems opening and

Re: Openoffice 2.0.1

2006-01-10 Thread Jack Malmostoso
On Tue, 10 Jan 2006 18:50:05 +0100, Rafael Rodríguez wrote: > I'll never learn to try before asking... > > #oo 2.0 > deb ftp://ftp-fourier.ujf-grenoble.fr/linux/oo64/ ./ It took me a while to figure out what to pull from experimental, but I am installing it right now. Thank you, will do feedback

Re: Openoffice 2.0.1

2006-01-10 Thread Mickael Marchand
Emmanuel Fleury wrote: > Mickael Marchand wrote: > >>well, the only thing I heard about having a native OOo on 64 bits was : >>"it' s just a dream, stop thinking about it" for months ;) >>so I am really amazed, it seems you did a really good job :) > > > Wow, don't over-estimate me !!! 8-o > >

Re: Openoffice 2.0.1

2006-01-10 Thread Emmanuel Fleury
Mickael Marchand wrote: > > well, the only thing I heard about having a native OOo on 64 bits was : > "it' s just a dream, stop thinking about it" for months ;) > so I am really amazed, it seems you did a really good job :) Wow, don't over-estimate me !!! 8-o The people from Openoffice.org did t

Re: Openoffice 2.0.1

2006-01-10 Thread Mickael Marchand
Emmanuel Fleury wrote: > Hi Mickael, > > Mickael Marchand wrote: > >>wow, what a surprise ! >> >>I've built the packages using your patch, and openoffice compile and >>_works_ just fine (I initially just wanted to see what was broken ;) > > > I find your lack of faith disturbing, Lord Marchand.

Re: Openoffice 2.0.1

2006-01-10 Thread Rafael Rodríguez
imental repository in my /etc/apt/sources.list: > > > > > > # Debian Experimental repository (sources) > > > deb-src ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian experimental main > > > > > > 2) Get the sources: > > > apt-get source -t experimental openoffice.org

Re: Openoffice 2.0.1

2006-01-10 Thread Rafael Rodríguez
? > > Cheers, > Mik > > Emmanuel Fleury a écrit : > > Hi all, > > > > I have some problem to build the debian package of OpenOffice 2.0.1. > > > > Here is what I do: > > > > 1) Add the experimental repository in my /etc/apt/sources.list: > >

Re: Openoffice 2.0.1

2006-01-10 Thread Emmanuel Fleury
Hi Mickael, Mickael Marchand wrote: > wow, what a surprise ! > > I've built the packages using your patch, and openoffice compile and > _works_ just fine (I initially just wanted to see what was broken ;) I find your lack of faith disturbing, Lord Marchand. ;-) In fact, I have been struggling w

Re: Openoffice 2.0.1

2006-01-10 Thread Mickael Marchand
be you had an incomplete build laying around before ? Cheers, Mik Emmanuel Fleury a écrit : > Hi all, > > I have some problem to build the debian package of OpenOffice 2.0.1. > > Here is what I do: > > 1) Add the experimental repository in my /etc/apt/sources.list: >

Openoffice 2.0.1

2006-01-09 Thread Emmanuel Fleury
Hi all, I have some problem to build the debian package of OpenOffice 2.0.1. Here is what I do: 1) Add the experimental repository in my /etc/apt/sources.list: # Debian Experimental repository (sources) deb-src ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian experimental main 2) Get the sources: apt-get source