--- Emmanuel Fleury [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha
scritto:
P|pex wrote:
I installed the 2.04 from sid, but OO.org don't
run...
is't bug ?
I guess more details would be welcome. :)
When I run oowriter the first time the following error
occurs
/home/gianluca/-writer doesn't exist
I close the
Am Mittwoch, 27. September 2006 21:56 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Your'e right. I meant if it is an official 64bit release from Sun
Microsystems.
Is not. SUn apparently doesn't care.
If not then what is the chance that the bugfixes that make this release usable
on 64bit systems will be
I installed the 2.04 from sid, but OO.org don't run...
is't bug ?
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Poco spazio e tanto spam? Yahoo! Mail ti protegge dallo spam e ti da tanto
spazio gratuito per i tuoi file e i messaggi
http://mail.yahoo.it
--
To
P|pex wrote:
I installed the 2.04 from sid, but OO.org don't run...
is't bug ?
I guess more details would be welcome. :)
Regards
--
Emmanuel Fleury | Office: 211
Associate Professor, | Phone: +33 (0)5 40 00 35 24
LaBRI, Domaine Universitaire | Fax: +33 (0)5 40 00 66 69
On Wednesday 27 September 2006 10:27, P|pex wrote:
I installed the 2.04 from sid, but OO.org don't run...
is't bug ?
What do you get if you run it from an xterm or so?
It works fine on my box...
Jan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
Is this AMD64 port of OOO in Sid an official one or is it made by the community?
Tomek
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is this AMD64 port of OOO in Sid an official one or is it made by the
community?
It's an official one.
Look there:
http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?keywords=openoffice.orgsearchon=namessubword=1version=unstablerelease=all
Regards
--
Emmanuel
On Wed, 27 Sep 2006, Emmanuel Fleury wrote:
It's an official one.
Look there:
http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?keywords=openoffice.orgsearchon=namessubword=1version=unstablerelease=all
I don't think the question was is it an official debian port, which it
clearly is. I
Giacomo Mulas wrote:
I don't think the question was is it an official debian port, which it
clearly is. I suppose he meant is it an official 64bit port released by
the OOo official site?. I don't know the answer to this latter one...
Hum I can't reach my own amd64 now but I can tell you how
Emmanuel Fleury wrote:
Giacomo Mulas wrote:
I don't think the question was "is it an official debian port", which it
clearly is. I suppose he meant "is it an official 64bit port released by
the OOo official site?". I don't know the answer to this latter one...
Hum I
Emmanuel Fleury wrote:
Giacomo Mulas wrote:
I don't think the question was is it an official debian port, which it
clearly is. I suppose he meant is it an official 64bit port released by
the OOo official site?. I don't know the answer to this latter one...
Hum I can't reach my own amd64 now
Użytkownik Giacomo Mulas [EMAIL PROTECTED] napisał:
On Wed, 27 Sep 2006, Emmanuel Fleury wrote:
It's an official one.
Look there:
http://packages.debian.org/...
I don't think the question was is it an official debian port, which it
clearly is. I suppose he meant is it an official 64bit port
Gudjon I. Gudjonsson wrote:
Hi again
An hour after my emailing I found out that openoffice for amd64 had been
accepted into the unstable repository. You can read about it on
http://openoffice.debian.net/
so I removed my packages immediately.
This is really a great news ! :)
Regards
--
13 matches
Mail list logo