Re: Pine

2005-06-09 Thread Petr Salinger
Could anybody tell me how to install Pine on a AMD64 platform? Pine license does not allow modified binaries to be distributed, therefore: apt-get build-dep pine apt-get -b source pine Regards Petr -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe

Re: Pine

2005-06-09 Thread Adam Stiles
On Thursday 09 June 2005 00:33, Jose Luis Iguain wrote: Could anybody tell me how to install Pine on a AMD64 platform? Many thanks, JL Ah, Pine. The one where the source is too open for its own good. The Pine licence insists for you to distribute modified versions in source code form only

Re: Pine

2005-06-09 Thread Bob Proulx
Adam Stiles wrote: Ah, Pine. The one where the source is too open for its own good. :-) And I don't see why there can't be a .deb package which contains the source code and patches, depends on the compiler and toolchain There is. But it is in the non-free section due to the license

Pine

2005-06-08 Thread Jose Luis Iguain
Could anybody tell me how to install Pine on a AMD64 platform? Many thanks, JL -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

pine license

2005-05-10 Thread Jaldhar H. Vyas
will become Debian soon anyway (and for all intents we ARE Debian - just not on their server), and they've already given Debian permission to distribute. For the rest of non-free, permission to distribute is not an issue, and not the reason they're in non-free to begin with. The pine author would

Re: pine license

2005-05-10 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
-free to begin with. The pine author would for one thing. Can we stop with that particular piece of FUD? The authors of Pine have no problems with third-party redistribution of of their software as long as the version number contains an L to show it is not the pristine UW version. We don't