Re: Re: "rock solid" motherboard

2005-03-12 Thread Superuserman
Paul- Thanks for the response. I don't have experience with the Sil controller chip. The VIA chips have absolutely no hardware raid functionality. The VIA chips can be configured to combine individual disks into an array with striping and/or mirroring or to not combine the disks at all. They have n

Re: "rock solid" motherboard

2005-03-12 Thread Michal Schmidt
Superuserman wrote: I could only find one SATA disk in Linux and never see the PATA whether RAID was turned on or off because of the sata_promise driver for kernel 2.6.10. I could not write to the RAID in Linux without errors. The new 2.6.11 kernel is supposed to make the PATA visible under Linux.

Re: "rock solid" motherboard

2005-03-12 Thread Paul Brook
On Saturday 12 March 2005 13:03, Superuserman wrote: > I should revise my explanation here: > > I can have 4 disks in DOS (c:, d:, e:, and f:) and then > > turn on the RAID1 mode and there is just one disk c: only. > > If that is RAID0 then the c: must be 4-formatted first. > > That doesn't use any

Re: "rock solid" motherboard

2005-03-12 Thread Paul Brook
On Saturday 12 March 2005 02:56, Superuserman wrote: > Paul wrote: > >> The Linux kernel does not now support any of the > >> motherboard chips capable of native RAID mode in the > >> BIOS. > > > > Not true. Read > > http://linux.yyz.us/sata/faq-sata-raid.html. > > Perhaps you missed the subject ma

Re: Re: Re: "rock solid" motherboard

2005-03-12 Thread Superuserman
I should revise my explanation here: I can have 4 disks in DOS (c:, d:, e:, and f:) and then turn on the RAID1 mode and there is just one disk c: only. If that is RAID0 then the c: must be 4-formatted first. That doesn't use any drivers or software except plain DOS. The 4 disks would actually be RA

Re: Re: "rock solid" motherboard

2005-03-12 Thread Superuserman
Michal wrote about this thread: http://lists.debian.org/debian-amd64/2005/03/msg00393.html The chip doesn't even have a RAID mode. With these chips, the RAID function has to be provided by software. In Windows the RAID function is provided by the BIOS + the Windows driver. I have already done the

Re: "rock solid" motherboard

2005-03-12 Thread Michal Schmidt
Superuserman wrote: The ABIT AV8 and my ASUS A8V both have the VIA8237 chip. The problem with the VIA8237 is the same as all the rest: the chips are not supported by the kernel in RAID mode. There are probably people someplace hacking around the kernel drivers and maybe they will get things workin

Re: Re: "rock solid" motherboard

2005-03-11 Thread Superuserman
Paul wrote: The Linux kernel does not now support any of the motherboard chips capable of native RAID mode in the BIOS. Not true. Read http://linux.yyz.us/sata/faq-sata-raid.html. Perhaps you missed the subject matter. The question is why the ABIT AV8 RAID mode in the BIOS does not work with Lin

Re: "rock solid" motherboard

2005-03-11 Thread Lennart Sorensen
On Fri, Mar 11, 2005 at 02:43:47PM +, Paul Brook wrote: > Most "sata raid" controllers aren't raid controllers. They're just normal > sata > controllers with a fancy bios. The do not have any hardware raid > capabilities. Works great as yet another sata or ide controller though. > This is

Re: "rock solid" motherboard

2005-03-11 Thread Paul Brook
> Using a Linux kernel shows two drives even when RAID is > enabled because the drivers bypass the BIOS. The drivers > just try to enable the disk controllers directly. That > problem can be found in the Kernel.org bugzilla. Most "sata raid" controllers aren't raid controllers. They're just norma

Re: Re: "rock solid" motherboard

2005-03-11 Thread Superuserman
Joshua Moore wrote: I hate to bring this up again, but this is the only discussion I've been able to find that speaks around my specific needs. I have the Abit AV8 and Athlon64 3000 CPU. When I try to install Debian with RAID-0 (two Western Digital SATA drives), it gets to the partitioning part

Re: "rock solid" motherboard

2005-03-11 Thread Clive Menzies
On (10/03/05 19:33), Joshua Moore wrote: > I hate to bring this up again, but this is the only discussion I've been > able to find that speaks around my specific needs. I have the Abit AV8 and > Athlon64 3000 CPU. When I try to install Debian with RAID-0 (two Western > Digital SATA drives), it

Re: Re: "rock solid" motherboard

2005-03-10 Thread Superuserman
Joshua Moore wrote: I hate to bring this up again, but this is the only discussion I've been able to find that speaks around my specific needs. I have the Abit AV8 and Athlon64 3000 CPU. When I try to install Debian with RAID-0 (two Western Digital SATA drives), it gets to the partitioning part and

Re: Re: "rock solid" motherboard

2005-03-10 Thread Superuserman
Joshua Moore wrote: I hate to bring this up again, but this is the only discussion I've been able to find that speaks around my specific needs. I have the Abit AV8 and Athlon64 3000 CPU. When I try to install Debian with RAID-0 (two Western Digital SATA drives), it gets to the partitioning part and

Re: "rock solid" motherboard

2005-03-10 Thread Joshua Moore
I hate to bring this up again, but this is the only discussion I've been able to find that speaks around my specific needs. I have the Abit AV8 and Athlon64 3000 CPU. When I try to install Debian with RAID-0 (two Western Digital SATA drives), it gets to the partitioning part and then it sees t

Re: "rock solid" motherboard

2005-01-13 Thread Steve McIntyre
Len Sorensen wrote: >On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 09:55:18PM -0600, doubletwist wrote: >> >> With that said, this system is rock solid at DDR333 with everything I've >> thrown at it, with the minor exception that the amd64 port of FreeBSD >> has some problems with the NIC. It works, but there are iss

Re: "rock solid" motherboard

2005-01-13 Thread Lennart Sorensen
On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 09:55:18PM -0600, doubletwist wrote: > I have an Abit KV8-MAX3. I had a similar issue with the RAM. After doing > some research I came up with the explaination for my issue. The Athlon > 64 [at least the version I have, 2800+] is designed only allow the > DDR400 on a sing

Re: "rock solid" motherboard

2005-01-12 Thread Norval Watson
Hi Filippo, I have GA-K8NSPro mobo, onboard sound is AC97 and works OK,LAN OK, USB ok. nv driver is OK but I don't run games so I haven't pushed it. There was an issue with two of the SATA inputs not being detected by the installer, if you connect the SATA drive/s to the inputs associated with the

Re: "rock solid" motherboard

2005-01-12 Thread doubletwist
Hank Barta wrote: I have an ABIT AV8 (v1.1) The LAN driver did not load so I put in a RealTek card and moved on. Sound on the motherboard works fine. I do have RAM issues in that I have to run the RAM at DDR333 instead of DDR400 (for which it is speced) and this board is known to be sensitive to th

Re: "rock solid" motherboard

2005-01-12 Thread Per Bojsen
*** Regarding Re: "rock solid" motherboard; [EMAIL PROTECTED] adds: seb> The kernel reports : seb> NFORCE3-250: IDE controller at PCI slot :00:08.0 seb> NFORCE3-250: chipset revision 162 seb> NFORCE3-250: not 100% native mode: will probe irqs later seb> NFORCE3-2

Re: "rock solid" motherboard

2005-01-12 Thread seb
On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 04:50:32PM -0500, Per Bojsen wrote: > *** Regarding Re: "rock solid" motherboard; [EMAIL PROTECTED] adds: > I have an Iwill DK8N motherboard which is also nForc3 250 based. I'm > running a 2.6.9 kernel and have no problems with SATA disks on the

Re: "rock solid" motherboard

2005-01-12 Thread Per Bojsen
*** Regarding Re: "rock solid" motherboard; [EMAIL PROTECTED] adds: seb> According to Tom's Hardware, the nForce3 250gb kicks ass of the seb> VIA chipset. If you want some extra bits of performance. None of seb> the nforce3 component of my K8N-E is unsupported. My only

Re: "rock solid" motherboard

2005-01-12 Thread Ron Johnson
On Wed, 2005-01-12 at 15:48 -0500, David Wood wrote: > On Wed, 12 Jan 2005, Ron Johnson wrote: > > >> Another note would be that if you plan on using SATA, make sure you stay > >> current with kernels (even despite this not being an nvidia board), and if > >> you plan on trying a SATA RAID, you wi

Re: "rock solid" motherboard

2005-01-12 Thread David Wood
On Wed, 12 Jan 2005, Ron Johnson wrote: Another note would be that if you plan on using SATA, make sure you stay current with kernels (even despite this not being an nvidia board), and if you plan on trying a SATA RAID, you will not be able to dual boot with it What about installing to a SATA JBOD?

Re: "rock solid" motherboard

2005-01-12 Thread Ron Johnson
On Wed, 2005-01-12 at 14:15 -0500, David Wood wrote: > On Wed, 12 Jan 2005, Hank Barta wrote: > [snip] > Another note would be that if you plan on using SATA, make sure you stay > current with kernels (even despite this not being an nvidia board), and if > you plan on trying a SATA RAID, you wil

Re: "rock solid" motherboard

2005-01-12 Thread David Wood
On Wed, 12 Jan 2005, Hank Barta wrote: I have an ABIT AV8 (v1.1) The LAN driver did not load so I put in a RealTek card and moved on. Sound on the motherboard works fine. I do have RAM issues in that I have to run the RAM at DDR333 instead of DDR400 (for which it is speced) and this board is known

Re: "rock solid" motherboard

2005-01-12 Thread Hank Barta
On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 15:04:40 +0200, Kyuu Eturautti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > My best experiences by far have been with Abit KV8-Pro and AV8 boards, > both with K8T800 Pro chipsets. I have not used audio in a single > AMD64+Linux system though, but as for stability, quality and hardware > comp

Re: "rock solid" motherboard

2005-01-12 Thread Steve McIntyre
Kyuu 'Vekotin' Eturautti wrote: > >My best experiences by far have been with Abit KV8-Pro and AV8 boards, >both with K8T800 Pro chipsets. I have not used audio in a single >AMD64+Linux system though, but as for stability, quality and hardware >compatibility (except for audio, not tested) with De

Re: 'rock solid' motherboard

2005-01-12 Thread Manuele Rampazzo
Hi, Filippo Carone disse: > Gigabyte GA-K8NS > Chipset: NVIDIA nForce3 250 + ITE IT8712F > Audio: Realtek ALC850 Ac'97 > Lan: ICS 1883 10/100Tx RJ45 or Marvell 8001 I've got this board and everything works very well [*] and it looks very stable... I use the snd_intel8x0 alsa module

Re: "rock solid" motherboard

2005-01-12 Thread Kyuu Eturautti
The choices I have are: Gigabyte GA-K8NS Chipset: NVIDIA nForce3 250 + ITE IT8712F Audio:Realtek ALC850 Ac'97 Lan: ICS 1883 10/100Tx RJ45 or Marvell 8001 Gigabyte GA-K8NF-9 Chipset: NVIDIA nForce4 4X MCPs Audio:Realtek ALC850 Ac'97 Lan: CICADA8201 Gigabit Asus K8V-DELUXE Chipset:

Re: "rock solid" motherboard

2005-01-12 Thread seb
On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 10:11:37AM +0100, Filippo Carone wrote: > Hi everybody, [snip] > > Almost the same applies for the nforce3 250-gb, in this list some say > some say the network and audio are well supported, while a mainboard > using this chipset, Gigabyte GA-K8N PRO shows a "?" in the sou