Re: amd64 dualcore nad raid1

2006-03-24 Thread Naz Gassiep
Apologies, I use a slightly different board, the one on the Tyan Transport Server Chassis GT24. Its the same chipset though, so you can pretty safely assume Sarge will have the same support for it. - Naz. Naz Gassiep wrote: I use that exact board with the same setup. The RAID1 on it is not tru

Re: amd64 dualcore nad raid1

2006-03-24 Thread Naz Gassiep
I use that exact board with the same setup. The RAID1 on it is not true RAID, so I use the Linux Software RAID to set up two RAID1 arrays of 2 drives each (i need two separate physical arrays for my purposes). It works well, and performance is good. Debian Sarge with the 2.6 kernel detects all

Re: amd64 dualcore nad raid1 unsubscribe

2006-03-23 Thread John Galatti
unsubscribe - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2006 9:48 PM Subject: Re: amd64 dualcore nad raid1 On Wed, Mar 22, 2006 at 11:53:58AM -0500, Lennart Sorensen wrote: On Wed, Mar 22, 2006 at 05:40:47PM +0100, Francesco Pietra wrot

Re: amd64 dualcore nad raid1

2006-03-22 Thread Roberto C. Sanchez
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > And from what I've heard, Linux's software raid is more reliable and > simple than most hardware RAIDs. > > -- hendrik > > All of my research on the topic certainly agrees with that assessment. Basically, I have found: - If you pay less than about US$1000 for you

Re: amd64 dualcore nad raid1

2006-03-22 Thread hendrik
On Wed, Mar 22, 2006 at 11:53:58AM -0500, Lennart Sorensen wrote: > On Wed, Mar 22, 2006 at 05:40:47PM +0100, Francesco Pietra wrote: > > i intend to setup a workstation for quantum mechanical calculations > > (organic > > chemistry) with a couple of amd64 dualcore 265 and a couple of STA hard >

Re: amd64 dualcore nad raid1

2006-03-22 Thread Lennart Sorensen
On Wed, Mar 22, 2006 at 05:40:47PM +0100, Francesco Pietra wrote: > i intend to setup a workstation for quantum mechanical calculations (organic > chemistry) with a couple of amd64 dualcore 265 and a couple of STA hard disks > 360GB raid 1 (mirroring for security reasons). > > Do you think that