Re: libc6-i386 versus ia32-libs

2006-03-16 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Harald Dunkel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hi Goswin, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: Harald Dunkel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: But if I run 'ldconfig -v' as suggested the /emul library directories are ignored. See below. The man page for ldconfig doesn't mention /lib/ldconfig either. Is your

Re: libc6-i386 versus ia32-libs

2006-03-15 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Harald Dunkel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Goswin von Brederlow wrote: Harald Dunkel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Is it possible that the new ia32-libs doesn't setup ld.so.conf? After changing it to /usr/X11R6/lib /emul/ia32-linux/lib /emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib

Re: libc6-i386 versus ia32-libs

2006-03-15 Thread Harald Dunkel
Hi Goswin, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: Harald Dunkel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: But if I run 'ldconfig -v' as suggested the /emul library directories are ignored. See below. The man page for ldconfig doesn't mention /lib/ldconfig either. Is your version in experimental? No, the normal sid

Re: libc6-i386 versus ia32-libs

2006-03-14 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Harald Dunkel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hi G. Goswin von Brederlow wrote: Yes. You can remove ia32-libs or have to wait for an update (ETA friday night, via NMU if the maintainer doesn't move). Is it possible that the new ia32-libs doesn't setup ld.so.conf? After changing it to

Re: libc6-i386 versus ia32-libs

2006-03-14 Thread Harald Dunkel
Goswin von Brederlow wrote: Harald Dunkel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Is it possible that the new ia32-libs doesn't setup ld.so.conf? After changing it to /usr/X11R6/lib /emul/ia32-linux/lib /emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib /emul/ia32-linux/usr/X11R6/lib and running ldconfig I

Re: libc6-i386 versus ia32-libs

2006-03-13 Thread Harald Dunkel
Hi G. Goswin von Brederlow wrote: Yes. You can remove ia32-libs or have to wait for an update (ETA friday night, via NMU if the maintainer doesn't move). Is it possible that the new ia32-libs doesn't setup ld.so.conf? After changing it to /usr/X11R6/lib

Re: libc6-i386

2006-03-04 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 11:13:36PM -0800, David Liontooth wrote: Just to make sure I understand: we're going multiarch? No more chrooted 32-bit environment? No, this is biarch. It's to replace ia32-libs. Multiarch is something totaly different. Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL

Re: libc6-i386

2006-03-04 Thread David Liontooth
Kurt Roeckx wrote: On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 11:13:36PM -0800, David Liontooth wrote: Just to make sure I understand: we're going multiarch? No more chrooted 32-bit environment? No, this is biarch. It's to replace ia32-libs. Multiarch is something totaly different. Thank you. Can

Re: libc6-i386

2006-03-04 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
David Liontooth [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Kurt Roeckx wrote: On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 11:13:36PM -0800, David Liontooth wrote: Just to make sure I understand: we're going multiarch? No more chrooted 32-bit environment? No, this is biarch. It's to replace ia32-libs. Multiarch is

Re: libc6-i386

2006-03-04 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Sat, Mar 04, 2006 at 04:34:35AM -0800, David Liontooth wrote: Kurt Roeckx wrote: On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 11:13:36PM -0800, David Liontooth wrote: Just to make sure I understand: we're going multiarch? No more chrooted 32-bit environment? No, this is biarch. It's to