http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct
* Never send your messages in HTML; use plain text instead.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-amd64-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/aanlkti
Partition magic really isn't worth it anymore. It rarely works with
modern large disks.
I agree. A similar open source solution that works better is
GParted. They have a bootable iso that gives you the same type of
functionality.
On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 11:43:02AM +, Michael Fothergill wrote:
> Dear Debian folks,
>
> I an running Lenny on an AMD64 box. I have 8GB of RAM on the
> machine in anticipation of putting Windows 7 on the machine. I know
> many Debian folks don't bother with Windows but I need it for cert
"
trust grub to boot Windows that trust
Windows to boot anything that is not Windows.
--
I don't get no respect.
Eduardo M KALINOWSKI
"
(
The crux of the matter -- trust
)
Is debian-lenny open source? Windoze obfuscated? Best to have two
separate boxes interconnected by ether-net.
There's nothing amd64 specific in this question, debian-user would
have been better.
On Qua, 08 Dez 2010, Michael Fothergill wrote:
I bought an extra SATA drive and hooked it up so now I have two one
with Debian on it. My plan is to install Windows on the new
drive.. If you installed Wi
On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 11:38:12AM -0600, Karl Schmidt wrote:
> Interesting - Pulse audio seems to be being pushed as a new "sound server"
>
> There is this from wikipedia http://www.javasonics.com/support/check_play.html
>
> I'm not understanding the whole of the sound picture in the Linux world -
On 12/07/2010 10:40 AM, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 12:43:42AM -0600, Karl Schmidt wrote:
Not sure how to fix this one. The possible source of the problem is iceweasel,
alsa, java, amd64..
I can't find much other than other people saying it didn't work. Flash
works fine -
On 12/07/2010 12:43 AM, Karl Schmidt wrote:
[snip]
Here is a java sound test - can anyone get this to work via
iceweasel/squeeze on amd64?
Where is the Java sound test?
--
Seek truth from facts.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-amd64-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscrib
On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 12:43:42AM -0600, Karl Schmidt wrote:
> Not sure how to fix this one. The possible source of the problem is
> iceweasel, alsa, java, amd64..
>
> I can't find much other than other people saying it didn't work. Flash
> works fine - I understand it talks directly to alsa.
On 11/29/10, Tomasz Nitecki wrote:
> On 29/11/10 17:00, dage...@free.fr wrote:
>> Anyway, just a remark, I have noticed that just after the installation
>> of Debian AMD 64, there's no xorg.conf file at all, but X runs well.
>> Any hints to make me understand ?
>
> It 'just works' due to its abili
On 29/11/10 17:00, dage...@free.fr wrote:
> Anyway, just a remark, I have noticed that just after the installation
> of Debian AMD 64, there's no xorg.conf file at all, but X runs well.
> Any hints to make me understand ?
It 'just works' due to its ability to auto-configure itself. Take a look
at
>
> Note that in the NVIDIA world there *is* a way to do this, so you
> might want to Google for something like:
> Linux fglrx 64-bit kernel 32-bit userland
Thank you.
I installed AMD 64 debian, and the installation of the driver just went
fine ! Sorry to have bother you all with such a s
On 11/29/2010 04:06 AM, dage...@free.fr wrote:
- "brian m. carlson" a écrit :
Is your installation i386 with a 64-bit kernel, or is it amd64?
Right. In fact ,it is i386 with 64-bit kernel.
What it sounds like to me is that you're using a 64-bit kernel on
i386,
which is supported by D
- "brian m. carlson" a écrit :
>
> Is your installation i386 with a 64-bit kernel, or is it amd64?
Right. In fact ,it is i386 with 64-bit kernel.
> What it sounds like to me is that you're using a 64-bit kernel on
> i386,
> which is supported by Debian (and in general, a good idea). Howe
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 11:14:43PM +0100, dage...@free.fr wrote:
> Here is the problem:
>
> I can't install official ATI drivers for my graphic card when using 64 bits
> kernels (tested on lenny and squeeze).
Is your installation i386 with a 64-bit kernel, or is it amd64?
> At the end, X program
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 07:04:53PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 16.11.2010 10:42, Roger Leigh wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 01:14:09AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
>>> On 14.11.2010 13:19, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 15:43:57 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> F
Florian Weimer, le Tue 16 Nov 2010 19:49:57 +0100, a écrit :
> * Roland McGrath:
>
> >> I can't see why you think --as-needed is fundamentally wrong or
> >> unnecessary.
> >
> > It is fundamentally wrong because -lfoo means I demand that the
> > initializers of libfoo.so run, whether or not I cal
* Roland McGrath:
>> I can't see why you think --as-needed is fundamentally wrong or unnecessary.
>
> It is fundamentally wrong because -lfoo means I demand that the
> initializers of libfoo.so run, whether or not I called anything in it.
So it's more like static linking. 8-)
IMHO, the current d
On 16.11.2010 10:42, Roger Leigh wrote:
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 01:14:09AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 14.11.2010 13:19, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 15:43:57 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
For wheezy I'm planning to change the linking behaviour for DSOs
(turning on --as-ne
Steve Langasek, le Tue 16 Nov 2010 09:14:40 -0800, a écrit :
> I don't argue that this makes --as-needed *correct* as a default, but I
> think it's clear how using --as-needed may benefit a distribution in terms
> of reducing churn when library dependencies change.
We agree on the second part, but
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 09:49:08AM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 21:29:07 -0500, Matt Turner wrote:
> > >> I can't see why you think --as-needed is fundamentally wrong or
> > >> unnecessary.
> > >> Check out http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/qa/asneeded.xml
> > >> --as-neede
* Kurt Roeckx [101114 14:08]:
> People have been claiming that constructors or init section are a
> possible problem. I have yet to see an example where it breaks.
The following example is a bit constructed, but shows a silent change
of run-time behaviour if --as-needed is passed:
$ cat > ertes
> This change is one I can agree with on technical grounds, though it
> will cause a great deal of pain in the short term. Have we got any
> estimates on exactly how much breakage will result before the change
> gets made?
Fedora already made the change a full release cycles ago, and Fedora
packa
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 01:14:09AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 14.11.2010 13:19, Julien Cristau wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 15:43:57 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
>>
>>> For wheezy I'm planning to change the linking behaviour for DSOs
>>> (turning on --as-needed and --no-copy-dt-needed-e
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 01:14:09 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 14.11.2010 13:19, Julien Cristau wrote:
> >On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 15:43:57 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> >
> >>For wheezy I'm planning to change the linking behaviour for DSOs
> >>(turning on --as-needed and --no-copy-dt-needed-e
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 21:29:07 -0500, Matt Turner wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 8:15 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Matt Turner, le Mon 15 Nov 2010 19:51:10 -0500, a écrit :
> >> On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 7:24 PM, Roger Leigh wrote:
> >> > What's the actual problem --as-needed is trying to so
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 8:15 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Matt Turner, le Mon 15 Nov 2010 19:51:10 -0500, a écrit :
>> On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 7:24 PM, Roger Leigh wrote:
>> > What's the actual problem --as-needed is trying to solve?
>> >
>> > The answer is mainly unwanted libraries being linked
Matt Turner, le Mon 15 Nov 2010 19:51:10 -0500, a écrit :
> On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 7:24 PM, Roger Leigh wrote:
> > What's the actual problem --as-needed is trying to solve?
> >
> > The answer is mainly unwanted libraries being linked in as a result
> > of using pkg-config (and various other -conf
> I can't see why you think --as-needed is fundamentally wrong or unnecessary.
It is fundamentally wrong because -lfoo means I demand that the
initializers of libfoo.so run, whether or not I called anything in it.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-amd64-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 7:24 PM, Roger Leigh wrote:
> What's the actual problem --as-needed is trying to solve?
>
> The answer is mainly unwanted libraries being linked in as a result
> of using pkg-config (and various other -config variants), though there
> are other, lesser, culprits. The pkg-c
On 16.11.2010 01:24, Roger Leigh wrote:
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 11:02:57PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 14.11.2010 16:06, Roger Leigh wrote:
While I understand the rationale for --no-copy-dt-needed-entries for
preventing encapsulation violations via indirect linking, I don't agree
with the u
On 14.11.2010 13:19, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 15:43:57 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
For wheezy I'm planning to change the linking behaviour for DSOs
(turning on --as-needed and --no-copy-dt-needed-entries. The
rationale is summarized in
http://wiki.debian.org/ToolChain/DSOL
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 11:02:57PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 14.11.2010 16:06, Roger Leigh wrote:
While I understand the rationale for --no-copy-dt-needed-entries for
preventing encapsulation violations via indirect linking, I don't agree
with the use of --as-needed *at all*.
> On 15.11.2010 07:16, Roland McGrath wrote:
> yes, OpenSuse is using --as-needed, but not --no-add-needed.
That is a pretty nutty choice.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-amd64-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: htt
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 11:02:57PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> maybe, and fix it in N - ~100 packages? Or fix the ~100 packages?
> The point of injection is for discussion. I would prefer having
> this set in dpkg-buildflags, and then disabled by these ~100
> packages. Note that this is proba
On 14.11.2010 16:06, Roger Leigh wrote:
While I understand the rationale for --no-copy-dt-needed-entries for
preventing encapsulation violations via indirect linking, I don't agree
with the use of --as-needed *at all*. If a library has been explicitly
linked in, it shouldn't be removed. This is
On 15.11.2010 07:16, Roland McGrath wrote:
airlied_, does Fedora use --as-needed by default? Fedora 14 too?
mattst88: yes
The naming of the options makes people easily confused.
--no-add-needed is the only option Fedora's gcc passes.
yes, OpenSuse is using --as-needed, but not --no-add-ne
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 04:58:52PM -0300, Felipe Valverde wrote:
> Definitively the culprit is the new driver. I tried the testing and the
> > unstable driver but they just do not work properly. They will freeze my
> > laptop as soon as I try to connect to a wireless network. My fix is just a
> > b
> airlied_, does Fedora use --as-needed by default? Fedora 14 too?
> mattst88: yes
The naming of the options makes people easily confused.
--no-add-needed is the only option Fedora's gcc passes.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-amd64-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 8:40 PM, Adam Goode wrote:
> On 11/14/2010 12:42 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
>> Please ignore me if I've misunderstood the situation, firstly.
>>
>> Both Fedora and Gentoo are using --as-needed by default now. And from
>> what I've read (google: site:blog.flameeyes.eu as-needed)
On 11/14/2010 12:42 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
> Please ignore me if I've misunderstood the situation, firstly.
>
> Both Fedora and Gentoo are using --as-needed by default now. And from
> what I've read (google: site:blog.flameeyes.eu as-needed) --as-needed
> is certainly useful and prevents lots of u
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 10:06 AM, Roger Leigh wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 01:51:49PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
>> On Sun, Nov 07, 2010 at 04:19:10PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
>> > On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 03:43:57PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
>> > > For wheezy I'm planning to change the link
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 01:19:08PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 15:43:57 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
>
> > For wheezy I'm planning to change the linking behaviour for DSOs
> > (turning on --as-needed and --no-copy-dt-needed-entries. The
> > rationale is summarized in
> >
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 01:51:49PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 07, 2010 at 04:19:10PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 03:43:57PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > > For wheezy I'm planning to change the linking behaviour for DSOs (turning
> > > on --as-needed and -
On Sun, Nov 07, 2010 at 04:19:10PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 03:43:57PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > For wheezy I'm planning to change the linking behaviour for DSOs (turning
> > on --as-needed and --no-copy-dt-needed-entries. The rationale is
> > summarized in http:
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 15:43:57 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> For wheezy I'm planning to change the linking behaviour for DSOs
> (turning on --as-needed and --no-copy-dt-needed-entries. The
> rationale is summarized in
> http://wiki.debian.org/ToolChain/DSOLinking. I would like to know
> about i
Hi
Definitively the culprit is the new driver. I tried the testing and the
> unstable driver but they just do not work properly. They will freeze my
> laptop as soon as I try to connect to a wireless network. My fix is just a
> band-aid and it can't be considered a good fix, but it works.
>
In or
Felipe,
I have my Intel 5100 wireless card working again.
This is what I did:
1. Purged the firmware-iwlwifi 0.27 from my system.
2. Installed this one instead:
firmware-iwlwi 0.24~bpo50+1 Binary firmware for Intel Wireless 3945, 496
I've downloaded this .deb from the lenny backports:
http://
I was WRONG. As soon as I rebooted and attempted to connect to my wireless
network the system hangs.
1. I've purged firmware-iwlwifi firmware-linux-nonfree from the system.
2. Rebooted.
3. With the system online I've installed firmware-iwlwifi.
4. Unplugged the network cable and enables the wireles
Am Mittwoch, 10. November 2010 schrieb Jaime Ochoa Malagón:
> some packages has been grouped...
>
> diff in diffutils
> mktemp in coreutils
>
> both in squeeze
>
> On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 6:58 AM, Mark Allums wrote:
> > On 11/9/2010 1:33 PM, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> I
On 11/10/2010 6:58 AM, Mark Allums wrote:
On 11/9/2010 1:33 PM, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote:
Hi all,
I am running debian-amd64/testing. When I start "orphaner" there are two
packages, which are marked as "essentials". These packages are "diff" and
"mktemp", but they are below "oldlibs". Can they safe
some packages has been grouped...
diff in diffutils
mktemp in coreutils
both in squeeze
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 6:58 AM, Mark Allums wrote:
> On 11/9/2010 1:33 PM, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I am running debian-amd64/testing. When I start "orphaner" there are two
>> package
On 11/9/2010 1:33 PM, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote:
Hi all,
I am running debian-amd64/testing. When I start "orphaner" there are two
packages, which are marked as "essentials". These packages are "diff" and
"mktemp", but they are below "oldlibs". Can they safely to be removed, as they
are meanwhile old
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 03:43:57PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> For wheezy I'm planning to change the linking behaviour for DSOs (turning
> on --as-needed and --no-copy-dt-needed-entries. The rationale is
> summarized in http://wiki.debian.org/ToolChain/DSOLinking. I would like
> to know about
On 10/31/2010 01:22 PM, Jenei Gábor wrote:
Hello!
Could anyone help me?I'm just trying to make an ADA program,but the
excercise seems to be to store variant records in an Array.Is it
Possible?Actually the memebers of my record depend on the
discriminant(if discriminant is true then I have one mo
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 01:41:50PM -0400, Whit Hansell wrote:
> Shuckydarns, hendrik. I'm gettin' spooked about this whole thing now.
If you don't have to keep your machine running 24/24 even during power
failures. If you can afford to have things down for a few hours if
things go wrong, t
Hendrik Boom wrote:
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 02:42:54PM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 07:39:52PM +0200, sigi wrote:
Hi Whit,
last time I tried to dist-upgrade to squeeze, I got stuck in an
(for me) unresolvable loop:
The system wanted to upgrade the kernel-ima
Thanks Brian. Info much appreciated.
Whit
brian m. carlson wrote:
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 07:39:52PM +0200, sigi wrote:
last time I tried to dist-upgrade to squeeze, I got stuck in an
(for me) unresolvable loop:
The system wanted to upgrade the kernel-image and udev in one run -
which fai
Darn, Thanks sigi for the info. Sorry it's taken me so long to get
back to reply. Hot hung up on some things. Will see what others have
said about things and am glad you gave me the heads up. That type of
thing is just what I was/am worried about. Not my idea of a good time. 8^)
Thanks
On 10/25/2010 09:24 PM, Hendrik Boom wrote:
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 09:10:09PM -0500, Karl Schmidt wrote:
I did the upgrade from lenny to squeeze without any problems - if you
read the wiki, you are supposed to upgrade apt dpkg and aptitude first -
then the kernel - then distupgrade.
And was y
I did the upgrade from lenny to squeeze without any problems - if you read the wiki, you are
supposed to upgrade apt dpkg and aptitude first - then the kernel - then distupgrade.
It worked - but - there is always some cruft that accumulates - so if you have time, you might want
to bkup your old
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 09:10:09PM -0500, Karl Schmidt wrote:
> I did the upgrade from lenny to squeeze without any problems - if you
> read the wiki, you are supposed to upgrade apt dpkg and aptitude first -
> then the kernel - then distupgrade.
And was your system up and usable during pretty w
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 02:42:54PM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 07:39:52PM +0200, sigi wrote:
> > Hi Whit,
> >
> > last time I tried to dist-upgrade to squeeze, I got stuck in an
> > (for me) unresolvable loop:
> > The system wanted to upgrade the kernel-image and ud
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 07:39:52PM +0200, sigi wrote:
> Hi Whit,
>
> last time I tried to dist-upgrade to squeeze, I got stuck in an
> (for me) unresolvable loop:
> The system wanted to upgrade the kernel-image and udev in one run -
> which failed. apt-get always complained, that the kernel-im
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 07:39:52PM +0200, sigi wrote:
> last time I tried to dist-upgrade to squeeze, I got stuck in an
> (for me) unresolvable loop:
> The system wanted to upgrade the kernel-image and udev in one run -
> which failed. apt-get always complained, that the kernel-image needs the
Hi Whit,
last time I tried to dist-upgrade to squeeze, I got stuck in an
(for me) unresolvable loop:
The system wanted to upgrade the kernel-image and udev in one run -
which failed. apt-get always complained, that the kernel-image needs the
new udev-package to upgrade - and udev itself neede
Hey Sam,
Thanks for the reply. It's helpful. Gracias
Whit
Sam Varghese wrote:
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 10:35:31PM -0400 Whit Hansell said:
Just thinking that since Squeeze is coming up to be the new stable
and have been running Lenny since March of 2009, I was wondering
about how diffic
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 10:35:31PM -0400 Whit Hansell said:
> Just thinking that since Squeeze is coming up to be the new stable
> and have been running Lenny since March of 2009, I was wondering
> about how difficult it would be to change from Lenny(stable) to
> Squeeze(testing) now.
I have bee
On Sat, 16 Oct 2010 16:52:26 -0500,
Seb wrote:
> Hi, On Debian sid system, I successfully created a LVM logical volume
> in a volume group in a USB external hard drive using
> system-config-lvm. The logical volume was designated as ext3, created
> a mount point for it under /media, and it was al
Alasdair writes:
> On Sat, 2010-10-02 at 16:17 +0200, Francesco Pietra wrote:
>> While gcc compiling a complex program (AmberTools of Amber suite, a
>> molecular dynamics package) on amd64 lenny (in the past it compiled
>> smoothly on this system):
>>
>> ./configure_at gcc
>> make -f Makefile_at
On 09/20/2010 10:49 AM, d...@nc.rr.com wrote:
[snip]
That said, I found this while looking for links to info on how to do
the above and decided to stop looking, and recommend a total boycott.
After years of experience. your choice.
http://homepage.mac.com/bradster/iarchitect/lotus.htm
Notes
On Sat, 2010-10-02 at 16:17 +0200, Francesco Pietra wrote:
> While gcc compiling a complex program (AmberTools of Amber suite, a
> molecular dynamics package) on amd64 lenny (in the past it compiled
> smoothly on this system):
>
> ./configure_at gcc
> make -f Makefile_at
>
> After a lot of compil
> "Christopher" == Christopher Judd writes:
Christopher> On Thursday 16 September 2010 13:02:11 Fabricio
Christopher> Cannini wrote:
>> On Thursday 16 September 2010 12:30:15 A J Stiles wrote: > On
>> Thursday 16 Sep 2010, Christopher Judd wrote: > > Hi,
>> > >
>> > >
Not really. Proprietary software tends to do odd things. Adobe, for
example, messes with the master boot record of the hard drive it's
installed on. The good thing about open source software is that it's much
harder to hide this sort of thing.
On Sat, 18 Sep 2010, Robert Isaac wrote:
I'm
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Robert Isaac wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm afraid it's not possible, as Lotus Notes is a non-free
>>> email/collaboration suite from IBM:
>>> http://www-01.ibm.com/software/lotus
>>
>> If the Source Code is not available then that is surely, in and of itself, a
>> good enoug
>>
>> I'm afraid it's not possible, as Lotus Notes is a non-free
>> email/collaboration suite from IBM:
>> http://www-01.ibm.com/software/lotus
>
> If the Source Code is not available then that is surely, in and of itself, a
> good enough reason to run it inside a chroot -- that way, it can't get a
On Thursday 16 September 2010 13:02:11 Fabricio Cannini wrote:
> On Thursday 16 September 2010 12:30:15 A J Stiles wrote:
> > On Thursday 16 Sep 2010, Christopher Judd wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I have to install lotus notes here. Our IT guys have provided me
with
> > >
> > > the file ibm_l
On Thursday 16 Sep 2010, Fabricio Cannini wrote:
> On Thursday 16 September 2010 12:30:15 A J Stiles wrote:
> > In general, it is best not to try to run anything that was not compiled
> > by either yourself or your own distro's package maintainers. Try
> > grabbing the "other distro" (i.e., Sourc
On Thursday 16 September 2010 11:30:15 A J Stiles wrote:
> On Thursday 16 Sep 2010, Christopher Judd wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have to install lotus notes here. Our IT guys have provided me with
> >
> > the file ibm_lotus_notes-8.5.i586.deb (linux support here is minimal).
>
> [stuff delete
On Thursday 16 September 2010 12:30:15 A J Stiles wrote:
> On Thursday 16 Sep 2010, Christopher Judd wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have to install lotus notes here. Our IT guys have provided me with
> >
> > the file ibm_lotus_notes-8.5.i586.deb (linux support here is minimal).
>
> [stuff deleted
ia32-apt-get :-P jajajja
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 8:54 AM, Christopher Judd wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have to install lotus notes here. Our IT guys have provided me with
> the file ibm_lotus_notes-8.5.i586.deb (linux support here is minimal).
> Following
> instructions from http://www.debian-ad
On Thursday 16 Sep 2010, Christopher Judd wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have to install lotus notes here. Our IT guys have provided me with
> the file ibm_lotus_notes-8.5.i586.deb (linux support here is minimal).
[stuff deleted]
> Does anyone have any idea how to fix this? I'd prefer not to have to
> On Mon, 16 Aug 2010 16:02:31 +0100, Matthew Vernon wrote:
>
>> [I'm not on this mailing list - it'd be kindness if you CCd any replies]
>> Hi,
>>
>> What's the status of Intel Mac support in Squeeze? I have managed to
>> install lenny on an intel mac pro, but it was a bit of a faff (and
>> invol
On 9/13/10, brian m. carlson wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 05:42:51PM -0700, Brian Morris wrote:
>> On 9/12/10, Hendrik Boom wrote:
>> > Would Debian's coming non-Linux platform (being BSD instead) be at all
>> > relevant ehre?
>>
>> I believe that is just a port of NetBSD packages, to be used
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 05:42:51PM -0700, Brian Morris wrote:
> On 9/12/10, Hendrik Boom wrote:
> > Would Debian's coming non-Linux platform (being BSD instead) be at all
> > relevant ehre?
>
> I believe that is just a port of NetBSD packages, to be used with the
> Debian Linux kernel and drivers
On 9/12/10, Hendrik Boom wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Aug 2010 16:02:31 +0100, Matthew Vernon wrote:
>
>> [I'm not on this mailing list - it'd be kindness if you CCd any replies]
>> Hi,
>>
>> What's the status of Intel Mac support in Squeeze?
I had it going for the 1st half of the year on my Macbook (2ghz
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 12:10:30PM +, Hendrik Boom wrote:
> I've been IP masquerading for years. But now my Pentium front-end machine
> has bit the dust, and I'm setting up my server to do the masquerading
> itself.
>
> It's and AMD65 running Debian lenny:
>
> hend...@lovesong:~$ uname -a
>
On Mon, 16 Aug 2010 16:02:31 +0100, Matthew Vernon wrote:
> [I'm not on this mailing list - it'd be kindness if you CCd any replies]
> Hi,
>
> What's the status of Intel Mac support in Squeeze? I have managed to
> install lenny on an intel mac pro, but it was a bit of a faff (and
> involved downl
You need to have rules in the FORWARD chain (of the filter table) -
The examples in the URL you referenced:
$IPTABLES -A FORWARD -i $EXTIF -o $INTIF -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED
-j ACCEPT
$IPTABLES -A FORWARD -i $INTIF -o $EXTIF -j ACCEPT
I'm guessing $EXTIF would be eth0, and $INTIF
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 1:00 PM, Lennart Sorensen
wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 05:39:33PM -0500, Karl Schmidt wrote:
>> I was thinking of getting a card like this for my camera:
>>
>> http://www.amazon.com/Eye-Fi-Class-Wireless-Memory-EYE-FI-8PC/dp/B002UT42UI
>>
>> Having a hard time figuring o
On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 05:39:33PM -0500, Karl Schmidt wrote:
> I was thinking of getting a card like this for my camera:
>
> http://www.amazon.com/Eye-Fi-Class-Wireless-Memory-EYE-FI-8PC/dp/B002UT42UI
>
> Having a hard time figuring out if there is support for these in squeeze?
>
> Has anyone been
On Fri, Sep 03, 2010 at 11:17:25AM +0200, reg exes wrote:
> I don't know if it affects other architectures... this is happening on a
> amd64.
> Now that you mention it... I don't have the problem on my laptop...
> it's 32-bit (i386).
I was trying to point out that this question (like most on this
I don't know if it affects other architectures... this is happening on a amd64.
Now that you mention it... I don't have the problem on my laptop...
it's 32-bit (i386).
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 2:04 AM, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 09:14:46AM +0200, reg exes wrote:
>> That's the p
On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 09:14:46AM +0200, reg exes wrote:
> That's the problem...
Is it amd64-specific?
Hamish
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-amd64-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100
Hi,
That's the problem...
xscreensaver & --> this works and xscreensaver is then running.It's
being run as my user, i.e. not root.
xscreensaver-command -lock --> this does not work. I always receive
the error below...
host1:myuser:~> xscreensaver &
[1] 32231
host1:myuser:~> ps -ef | grep xscree
xscreensaver &
xscreensaver-command -lock
should work or is not running xscreensaver after the fisrt step?
ps aux |grep xscreensaver
don't use root!!!
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 3:57 AM, reg exes wrote:
> I'm not using KDE... I'm using Enlightenment as my window manager.
> Doesn't seem to matter a
I'm not using KDE... I'm using Enlightenment as my window manager.
Doesn't seem to matter anway. I cannot get xscreensaver to do what it
should?
If I run xscreensaver manually and then try lock the screen, I always get
host1:myuser:~> xscreensaver-command -lock
xscreensaver-command: no screensav
If your running KDE, go the K(Start button, lower left of screen and at
the bottom along with "switch user" and "log out", you will find "lock
session".
reg exes wrote:
Hello everyone,
I upgraded my system from Etch to Lenny a looong time ago... just
noticed something odd.
When trying to lock
> Sid is always unstable - never released - the backronym is "Still In
> Development"
> Don't run sid unless you are prepared to deal with a high pace of change,
> a high churn rate in terms of packages and a degree of breakage.
If you learn how to use a package manager like synaptics or aptitu
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 07:42:56PM -0700, Willy Gommel wrote:
> Since your freeze began. I've been having a problem in getting any Testing
> information to download from any of your mirrors. It is most annoying, as I
> cannot upgrade anything at this time.
>
> My question is: Is this regarded as
1101 - 1200 of 20693 matches
Mail list logo
