Hi,
it seems I have to repair my XFS filesystem manually (recovery fails).
Can anyone recommend a rescue CD with at least kernel 2.6.10 (needed
for my SATA controller) and XFS support? A debian install CD would
work, if it had kernel 2.6.10 on it... Is there something like that
out there?
Thinkin
Knoppix meets the requirements. Beware XFS with NFS and/or Samba. I have
recently moved all my clients systems off XFS.
Ed.
On Fri, 2005-06-10 at 10:11 +0200, Thomas Steffen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> it seems I have to repair my XFS filesystem manually (recovery fails).
> Can anyone recommend a rescue C
Or, you may want to use Ubuntu Live CD - it's got all the AMD64, XFS, and
SATA, and is debian based too.
HTH, jbar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 6/10/05, Ed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Knoppix meets the requirements. Beware XFS with NFS and/or Samba. I have
> recently moved all my clients systems off XFS.
I agree. As I posted before, I am not happy with XFS either, but I
have not made the effort yet to change it. I will probably change
On (10/06/05 10:11), Thomas Steffen wrote:
> it seems I have to repair my XFS filesystem manually (recovery fails).
> Can anyone recommend a rescue CD with at least kernel 2.6.10 (needed
> for my SATA controller) and XFS support? A debian install CD would
> work, if it had kernel 2.6.10 on it... Is
On 06/10/05 12:09:35PM +0200, Thomas Steffen wrote:
> On 6/10/05, Ed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Knoppix meets the requirements. Beware XFS with NFS and/or Samba. I have
> > recently moved all my clients systems off XFS.
>
> I agree. As I posted before, I am not happy with XFS either, but I
> h
ECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 10, 2005 10:34 AM
To: Thomas Steffen
Cc: Ed; debian-amd64@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Rescue CD wanted: 2.6.10, SATA and XFS
On 06/10/05 12:09:35PM +0200, Thomas Steffen wrote:
> On 6/10/05, Ed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Knoppix meets the requireme
since SGI put out their 1.0
Linux port and while there have been issues, I consider it much better than
reiserfs.
Jim.
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jim Crilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, June 10, 2005 10:34 AM
> To: Thomas Steffen
> Cc: Ed; debian-am
0, 2005 10:34 AM
To: Thomas Steffen
Cc: Ed; debian-amd64@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Rescue CD wanted: 2.6.10, SATA and XFS
On 06/10/05 12:09:35PM +0200, Thomas Steffen wrote:
On 6/10/05, Ed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Knoppix meets the requirements. Beware XFS with NFS and/or Samba. I have
message. I've been using XFS since SGI put out their 1.0
> >Linux port and while there have been issues, I consider it much better than
> >reiserfs.
> >
> >Jim.
> >
> >>
> >>
> >>-Original Message-
> >>From: Jim C
On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 10:50:43AM -0400, Wes Williams wrote:
> I've been very happy with XFS and have migrated TOWARDS XFS all around, save
> the boot partition. BTW, being able to boot from XFS would be a nice touch!
>
> What problems in particular are you experiencing with XFS and NFS/Samba?
On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 04:37:12PM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> I recently migrated to ext3 from xfs since 2.6.10 and lower at least
> would regularly leak enough memory that the system ran out of memory.
>
> That is on a system using md raid1 on two sata drives, with lvm on top,
> running xfs
Lennart Sorensen wrote:
>I recently migrated to ext3 from xfs since 2.6.10 and lower at least
>would regularly leak enough memory that the system ran out of memory.
>
>That is on a system using md raid1 on two sata drives, with lvm on top,
>running xfs in a couple of LVs. It is now all ext3 and I
Thanks for all the responses. I am still too lazy to change my root
fs, so it will stay XFS for a while. I did not download Knoppix
either, it is just to big for my connection.
But I did find INSERT, the Inside Security Rescue Toolkit
(http://www.inside-security.de/insert.html). In contrast to all
14 matches
Mail list logo
