Re: Silicon Motion chip on amd64

2006-10-03 Thread Free Ekanayaka
|--==> Hamish Moffatt writes: HM> Apparently X has an interpreter to run the real-mode video card BIOS, HM> even from 64-bit userspace. So it should work. HM> Is the Silicon Motion your primary device or is that the NVIDIA? >>According to the BIOS settings it should be the Silicon, but h

Re: Silicon Motion chip on amd64

2006-10-02 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 03:54:20PM +0200, Free Ekanayaka wrote: > thanks for your answer, > |--==> Hamish Moffatt writes: > HM> Questions: is it any better if you pull out the NVIDIA card? > I've tried to remove the NVIDIA card, but it doesn't seem to make any > difference. > Here are the X log

Re: Silicon Motion chip on amd64

2006-10-02 Thread Free Ekanayaka
thanks for your answer, |--==> Hamish Moffatt writes: HM> Questions: is it any better if you pull out the NVIDIA card? I've tried to remove the NVIDIA card, but it doesn't seem to make any difference. Here are the X log and the lspci output of the modified system: http://people.64studio.com/~fre

Re: Silicon Motion chip on amd64

2006-10-02 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 07:51:25AM +0200, Free Ekanayaka wrote: > I can't get xorg working with the Silicon Motion, Inc. SM720 Lynx3DM > (rev c1), ID 126f:072, VGA controller on a etch/amd64 system. > > Note that the same hardware works fine with etch/i386. > Here is the output of lscpi, the xor

Silicon Motion chip on amd64

2006-10-01 Thread Free Ekanayaka
Hi all, I can't get xorg working with the Silicon Motion, Inc. SM720 Lynx3DM (rev c1), ID 126f:072, VGA controller on a etch/amd64 system. Note that the same hardware works fine with etch/i386. Here is the output of lscpi, the xorg.conf, and Xorg.0.log: http://people.64studio.com/~free/xorg.c