Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Jerome Warnier writes:
>
>
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> I'm running Squid3 on Debian Lenny for AMD64.
>> The strange thing is that I can read the following from Squid's
>> cache.log:
>> Version 1 of swap file without LFS support detected...
>>
>> I thought that LFS was stand
On 12.08.2009, Jerome Warnier wrote:
> Version 1 of swap file without LFS support detected...
> I thought that LFS was standard behavior on 64-bits GNU/Linux.
Yes, this has nothing to say if you are on a 64-bit system. Just ignore it,
you have native lfs anyway. This is intended for 32-bit syst
Jerome Warnier writes:
> Hi guys,
>
> I'm running Squid3 on Debian Lenny for AMD64.
> The strange thing is that I can read the following from Squid's
> cache.log:
> Version 1 of swap file without LFS support detected...
>
> I thought that LFS was standard behavior on 64-bits GNU/Linux.
>
> Am I
Hi guys,
I'm running Squid3 on Debian Lenny for AMD64.
The strange thing is that I can read the following from Squid's
cache.log:
Version 1 of swap file without LFS support detected...
I thought that LFS was standard behavior on 64-bits GNU/Linux.
Am I wrong? Where?
Thanks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
4 matches
Mail list logo