Re: The non-existent unofficial sarge for amd64

2005-01-20 Thread Anders Boström
GvB == Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hi Goswin! GvB Anders Boström [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: KR == Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: KR On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 04:35:28PM +0100, Anders Boström wrote: As I wrote in my original question is /debian-pure64 not

Re: The non-existent unofficial sarge for amd64

2005-01-20 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Anders Boström [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: GvB == Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hi Goswin! GvB Anders Boström [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: KR == Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: KR On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 04:35:28PM +0100, Anders Boström wrote: As I wrote

Re: The non-existent unofficial sarge for amd64

2005-01-18 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Anders Boström [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: KR == Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: KR On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 04:35:28PM +0100, Anders Boström wrote: As I wrote in my original question is /debian-pure64 not updated. Last update was 20041215. Small update. Q did build a few new

Re: The non-existent unofficial sarge for amd64

2005-01-18 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 11:53:01AM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: Anders Boström [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: KR == Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: KR On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 04:35:28PM +0100, Anders Boström wrote: As I wrote in my original question is /debian-pure64 not