Though a trivial question for most (not me), what is
the correct procedure AT THIS TIME to bring etch to
sid?
Is
# apt-get -u dist-upgrade
the way for both amd64 and i386? I assume that this
upgrades the Linux kernel too. What about X? (I do not
use nVidia drivers, enough 2D acceleration in my
2007/3/10, Francesco Pietra [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Though a trivial question for most (not me), what is
the correct procedure AT THIS TIME to bring etch to
sid?
As others said before, sid/unstable will never be something else.
So /etc/apt/sources.list must point to sid or unstable to bring etch to
Am Donnerstag, 8. März 2007 23:11 schrieb R. Ramesh:
Hi,
I thought testing is named etch. But when I go to debian installer
page for netinst image for amd64 version, I get an iso file that is
named xxx-testing-xxx.iso. However the title on the page says it is Sid!
I am wondering if this a
On Friday, 09.03.2007 at 14:32 +0100, Florian Philipp wrote:
Recently Etch became stable and therefore Sid is the now testing.
That's completely wrong.
Etch *will* be the next stable, but it isn't yet.
Sid is *not* testing, and never will be. Sid will always be Unstable.
When Etch becomes
Florian Philipp wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 8. März 2007 23:11 schrieb R. Ramesh:
Hi,
I thought testing is named etch. But when I go to debian installer
page for netinst image for amd64 version, I get an iso file that is
named xxx-testing-xxx.iso. However the title on the page says it is Sid!
I
Hi,
I thought testing is named etch. But when I go to debian installer
page for netinst image for amd64 version, I get an iso file that is
named xxx-testing-xxx.iso. However the title on the page says it is Sid!
I am wondering if this a typo on the title or is there a link problem
that
6 matches
Mail list logo
