Jonas Meurer wrote:
> On 27/09/2005 Marc F. Clemente wrote:
>
>>>Where might I find the sources and patches from which you compiled
>>>your version of OOo2?
>>
>>Patch:
>>http://mclemente.net/~marc/ooo2-marc.diff
>>
>>My sources:
>>deb-src http://mclemente.net/debian/ ./
>>
>>The only changes I ma
Inconsistency detected by ld.so: dl-minimal.c: 137: realloc: Assertion
I was able to work around this bug by doing this before building:
export LD_PRELOAD=/lib/libc.so.6
Still don't have a successful build (it's still building), but I was
able to get past that point.
--
Matthew A. Nicholson
M
Hi,
> > The openoffice 1.9 is unstable (beta). Effectively openoffice crashes
> > sometimes. I don't know if the openoffice 1.1 can be recompiled.
>
> "Sometimes" is quite a understatement.
[...]
> If there's amd64 OOo debs around they are usually the 32bit stuff.
is it imaginable, when th
[ Note: I am *not* subscribed to debian-amd64, please CC: me on replies ]
Hi,
Stefano Simonucci wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-09-01 at 23:26 +0200, Leopold Palomo Avellaneda wrote:
> > Thank's Stefano,
> >
> > I will try to reproduce it soon.
> >
> > It's surprise me if it's really so easy and no packa
On 27/09/2005 Marc F. Clemente wrote:
> > Where might I find the sources and patches from which you compiled
> > your version of OOo2?
>
> Patch:
> http://mclemente.net/~marc/ooo2-marc.diff
>
> My sources:
> deb-src http://mclemente.net/debian/ ./
>
> The only changes I made were to the debian/r
> Where might I find the sources and patches from which you compiled
> your version of OOo2?
Patch:
http://mclemente.net/~marc/ooo2-marc.diff
My sources:
deb-src http://mclemente.net/debian/ ./
The only changes I made were to the debian/rules file and to the
vbarange.cxx and vbarange.hxx files
On Monday 19 September 2005 00:37, Marc F. Clemente wrote:
> I was finally able to build ooo2 from sources for amd64. Try it at:
>
> deb http://mclemente.net/debian/ ./
>
> If it doesn't work for you, I doubt I would be able to help you.
> Constructive criticism is welcome.
>
> Marc
Where might I
Robert Isaac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello,
>
> --- Alexander Rapp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>
>> If I recall correctly from my own ooo2 build, the
>> only modifications
>> needed were editing some incorrectly autogenerated
>> files (chaning int to
>> long IIRC, can't remember the exact
Jose Ildefonso Camargo Tolosa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The OpenOffice sources are avaible from the OpenOffice project. He
> just built them for Debian AMD64.
Just for your information: That is absolutely irelevant. As
distributer of the binary he has to follow the GPL. What some other,
no m
Hello,
--- Alexander Rapp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> If I recall correctly from my own ooo2 build, the
> only modifications
> needed were editing some incorrectly autogenerated
> files (chaning int to
> long IIRC, can't remember the exact details) and
> restarting the build
> process with dp
Jose Ildefonso Camargo Tolosa wrote:
> Hi!
>
> The OpenOffice sources are avaible from the OpenOffice project. He
> just built them for Debian AMD64.
>
> What you should ask is: Marc, how did you done that? Which is what I
> think you wanna know.
>
> I don't know why you have to start bothering t
Hi!
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 09:23:38PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
"Marc F. Clemente" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I was finally able to build ooo2 from sources for amd64. Try it at:
deb http://mc
Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 09:23:38PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> "Marc F. Clemente" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > I was finally able to build ooo2 from sources for amd64. Try it at:
>> >
>> > deb http://mclemente.net/debian/ ./
>> >
>> >
On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 09:23:38PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> "Marc F. Clemente" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I was finally able to build ooo2 from sources for amd64. Try it at:
> >
> > deb http://mclemente.net/debian/ ./
> >
> > If it doesn't work for you, I doubt I would be able
"Marc F. Clemente" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I was finally able to build ooo2 from sources for amd64. Try it at:
>
> deb http://mclemente.net/debian/ ./
>
> If it doesn't work for you, I doubt I would be able to help
> you. Constructive criticism is welcome.
>
> Marc
You are aware that you a
I was finally able to build ooo2 from sources for amd64. Try it at:
deb http://mclemente.net/debian/ ./
If it doesn't work for you, I doubt I would be able to help you.
Constructive criticism is welcome.
Marc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tr
Stefano Simonucci <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, 2005-09-01 at 23:26 +0200, Leopold Palomo Avellaneda wrote:
>> Thank's Stefano,
>>
>> I will try to reproduce it soon.
>>
>> It's surprise me if it's really so easy and no package for amd64.
>>
>> Leo
>
> The openoffice 1.9 is unstable (be
I tried building ooo2 but was unsuccessful. I used version 1.9.125.
Eventually the build failed at:
Making: ../../../unxlngx4.pro/slo/vbaapplication.obj
This is the same problem reported in this message:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-amd64/2005/09/msg00303.html
If anybody can get past this,
On Thu, 2005-09-01 at 23:26 +0200, Leopold Palomo Avellaneda wrote:
> Thank's Stefano,
>
> I will try to reproduce it soon.
>
> It's surprise me if it's really so easy and no package for amd64.
>
> Leo
The openoffice 1.9 is unstable (beta). Effectively openoffice crashes
sometimes. I don't know
Thank's Stefano,
I will try to reproduce it soon.
It's surprise me if it's really so easy and no package for amd64.
Leo
A Dijous 01 Setembre 2005 18:15, Stefano Simonucci va escriure:
> On Thu, 2005-09-01 at 16:37 +0200, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote:
> > A Dimecres 31 Agost 2005 23:56, Stefa
On Thu, 2005-09-01 at 16:37 +0200, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote:
> A Dimecres 31 Agost 2005 23:56, Stefano Simonucci va escriure:
> > On Wed, 2005-08-31 at 18:09 +0200, Frank wrote:
> > > > They will both allow setting up a 32bit chroot, which is the recomended
> > > > way to run openoffice sinc
A Dimecres 31 Agost 2005 23:56, Stefano Simonucci va escriure:
> On Wed, 2005-08-31 at 18:09 +0200, Frank wrote:
> > > They will both allow setting up a 32bit chroot, which is the recomended
> > > way to run openoffice since it isn't 64bit compatible yet.
> >
> > Using a chroot is not the only way
On Wed, 2005-08-31 at 18:09 +0200, Frank wrote:
> > They will both allow setting up a 32bit chroot, which is the recomended
> > way to run openoffice since it isn't 64bit compatible yet.
>
> Using a chroot is not the only way of running OpenOffice on the Pure64/AMD64
> port of Debian. Look on thi
> They will both allow setting up a 32bit chroot, which is the recomended
> way to run openoffice since it isn't 64bit compatible yet.
Using a chroot is not the only way of running OpenOffice on the Pure64/AMD64
port of Debian. Look on this list for a package called "amd64 archive", which
provid
On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 01:11:52PM +0200, "Miguel J. Jim?nez" wrote:
> I have installed recently Debian AMD64 testing/amd-64 . My question is a
> simple one: what are the main differences between amd-64 and pure-64? Is
> the first flavor a mix of 32 and 64 bits libraries or what? Wich one (if
>
I have installed recently Debian AMD64 testing/amd-64 . My question is a
simple one: what are the main differences between amd-64 and pure-64? Is
the first flavor a mix of 32 and 64 bits libraries or what? Wich one (if
any) support OpenOffice.org? I found OpenOffice.org in the amd-64
testing re
26 matches
Mail list logo
