Re: cdrdao maintainer and status (bug 249642)

2005-10-18 Thread Lennart Sorensen
On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 12:33:06AM +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote: > check out sarge-unsupported aka "stinkypete": > > deb http://amd64.debian.net/debian-amd64/ stinkypete main > > (available on your favorite mirror) > > actually, it contains the following packages from maintainers who where > n

Re: cdrdao maintainer and status (bug 249642)

2005-10-17 Thread Frederik Schueler
Hello, On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 11:47:40PM +0200, Frank Siegert wrote: > I always found it strange that cdrdao (which is required by e.g. k3b) is not > in the official AMD64 archive. Now I found this bugreport[1], already > attached is a fix, which has been tested by quite a few people. And still

cdrdao maintainer and status (bug 249642)

2005-10-17 Thread Frank Siegert
I always found it strange that cdrdao (which is required by e.g. k3b) is not in the official AMD64 archive. Now I found this bugreport[1], already attached is a fix, which has been tested by quite a few people. And still the maintainer Andrew Suffield refuses to accept this patch in quite a stra