Re: deborphan

2006-02-10 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
are wrong (missing). deborphan can't see a dependency that isn't stated in the Packages file. MfG Goswin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

deborphan

2005-12-30 Thread antongiulio05
Hi, launching deborphan I got a list of packages (for default in libs and oldlibs). Does it mean that I can remove that packages without risks? Thanks, Giulio -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: deborphan

2005-12-30 Thread Clive Menzies
On (30/12/05 13:20), antongiulio05 wrote: Hi, launching deborphan I got a list of packages (for default in libs and oldlibs). Does it mean that I can remove that packages without risks? As I understand it, it is safe to remove any libraries that are reported by $ deborphan without any

Re: deborphan

2005-12-30 Thread Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh)
Le 30.12.2005 13:39:57, Clive Menzies a écrit : On (30/12/05 13:20), antongiulio05 wrote: Hi, launching deborphan I got a list of packages (for default in libs and oldlibs). Does it mean that I can remove that packages without risks? As I understand it, it is safe to remove any libraries

Re: deborphan

2005-12-30 Thread antongiulio05
launching deborphan I got a list of packages (for default in libs and oldlibs). Does it mean that I can remove that packages without risks? As I understand it, it is safe to remove any libraries that are reported by $ deborphan I've seen an aception: It reports wx2.6-i18n