On Wednesday 03 January 2007 18:12, Peter Welch wrote:
> "The proxy information should be given in the standard form of"
> http://[[user][:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:port]/
>
> Well, whatever I try doesn't work but while it may be painfully obvious to
> some how to interpret that syntax, it has me baffled.
On Wed, Jan 03, 2007 at 12:12:53PM -0600, Peter Welch wrote:
> "The proxy information should be given in the standard form of"
> http://[[user][:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:port]/
>
> Well, whatever I try doesn't work but while it may be painfully obvious to
> some how to interpret that syntax, it has me b
"The proxy information should be given in the standard form of"
http://[[user][:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:port]/
Well, whatever I try doesn't work but while it may be painfully obvious to some
how to interpret that syntax, it has me baffled.
I have a userid and password and am told that it is IP 192.168
Your message with subject Message could not be delivered sent on
09/13/06, 07:50:28 contained one or more attachments not allowed by
Chevron and was blocked. If you did not send such an email, your email
address may have been spoofed. In this case, no further action is
required on your part and you
e for ICMP only in my firewall scripts, something like
iptables -A INPUT -i ppp0 -p ICMP --icmp-type echo-request -j ACCEPT
Hope this helps you.
Please someone correct me if I'm wrong (but it works for me anyway).
Vit
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "
thout firewall ;-)
When I ping a machine in the internet, I see the following result on tcpdump:
19:35:24.866434 IP 21x.8x.7x.7x > 21x.18x.14x.10x: ICMP echo request, id
46871, seq 1536, length 64
19:35:24.898032 IP 21x.18x.14x.10x > 21x.8x.7x.7x: ICMP echo reply, id
46871, seq 1536, length 64
www.google.com and type: how to respond to a question
Seriously, is telling someone to google an answer to their question
anywhere close to a useful response. It's not worth the space it
takes up in my inbox or the forums.
Anyway, "iptables -L" will tell you what your current fir
Alan Ianson kiedys napisal:
> One of my apps tells me I am firewalled UDP and TCP. I see in dselect
> iptables is installed but I don't know if it is being loaded or where I
> can configure it if so. This is a new amd64 install so I am not that
> familiar with it. Any ideas where I should look wou
One of my apps tells me I am firewalled UDP and TCP. I see in dselect iptables
is installed but I don't know if it is being loaded or where I can configure
it if so. This is a new amd64 install so I am not that familiar with it. Any
ideas where I should look would be appreciated.
I read in here
Stephen Gran wrote:
This one time, at band camp, Pete said:
Hi all,
Just wondering if anyone has managed to install the Checkpoint
SecureClient under AMD64 at all?
I just started a new job this week and need remote access for when I'm
on call, and I have a VPN token and need to use the
Lennart Sorensen wrote:
On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 09:22:55PM +1000, Pete wrote:
Thanks Clive, glad to see I'm not the only one in this position.
I have no intention of installing RedHat (I'd rather dual boot XP!), but
I have seen somewhere on a Google search that FreeSwan will talk to
Check
This one time, at band camp, Pete said:
> Hi all,
>
> Just wondering if anyone has managed to install the Checkpoint
> SecureClient under AMD64 at all?
>
> I just started a new job this week and need remote access for when I'm
> on call, and I have a VPN token and need to use the Checkpoint cli
On (29/06/05 08:24), Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> Well you would not want pptp for anything, so the webmin module isn't
> interesting. PPTP is really that bad. NT4 was really about the only
> thing to ever try to promote it until the flaws in the encryption system
> were shown to make it very insecu
Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 01:20:05PM +0100, Clive Menzies wrote:
> > I just looked at openswan but on trying to install it got:
> > WARNING: untrusted versions of the following packages will be installed!
>
> Never seen that message before. Are you running some silly sign
On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 01:20:05PM +0100, Clive Menzies wrote:
> I just looked at openswan but on trying to install it got:
> WARNING: untrusted versions of the following packages will be installed!
Never seen that message before. Are you running some silly signature
checking feature in apt or de
On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 09:22:55PM +1000, Pete wrote:
> Thanks Clive, glad to see I'm not the only one in this position.
>
> I have no intention of installing RedHat (I'd rather dual boot XP!), but
> I have seen somewhere on a Google search that FreeSwan will talk to
> Checkpoint, but as I know
On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 12:14:50PM +0100, Clive Menzies wrote:
> I can't help with your question re: Checkpoint but I'm in the same
> postion of having to reboot into XP for VPN remote access.
>
> I came up with the following possibilities and have had a cursory look
> at vpnc:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On (29/06/05 21:22), Pete wrote:
> Clive Menzies wrote:
>
> >I can't help with your question re: Checkpoint but I'm in the same
> >postion of having to reboot into XP for VPN remote access.
> >
> >I came up with the following possibilities and have had a cursory look
> >at vpnc:
> >[EMAIL PROTECTE
Clive Menzies wrote:
I can't help with your question re: Checkpoint but I'm in the same
postion of having to reboot into XP for VPN remote access.
I came up with the following possibilities and have had a cursory look
at vpnc:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ apt-cache search vpn | grep client
vpnc - Cisco
On (29/06/05 20:53), Pete wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Just wondering if anyone has managed to install the Checkpoint
> SecureClient under AMD64 at all?
>
> I just started a new job this week and need remote access for when I'm
> on call, and I have a VPN token and need to use the Checkpoint client.
>
Hi all,
Just wondering if anyone has managed to install the Checkpoint
SecureClient under AMD64 at all?
I just started a new job this week and need remote access for when I'm
on call, and I have a VPN token and need to use the Checkpoint client.
Unfortunately, they only supply RedHat 7.2/7.
21 matches
Mail list logo
