On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 10:39:59AM -0400, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 11:09:37PM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> > You could run sid? Or backport nspluginwrapper?
>
> nspluginwrapper can't be backported due to conflicting dependencies with
> etch. I'm not going to run sid
On 13-Jul-2007 15:39.59 (BST), Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
> > You could run sid? Or backport nspluginwrapper?
> nspluginwrapper can't be backported due to conflicting dependencies with
> etch. I'm not going to run sid on what amounts to a production
> workstation/server.
There's no 32-bit lib
On 14-Jul-2007 02:10.10 (BST), Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> Though I couldn't find ia32-libs-gtk for etch (even though ia32-libs
> suggests it).
etch's ia32-libs contains a v1.2 Gtk+ library, which is insufficient (I
think!)
--
rob andrews :: pgp 0x01e00563 :: [EMAIL PROTECTED
/welcome doesn't work with konqueror for
> some reason but it works as expected with iceweasel.
> Glad you got flash working.. :)
konqueror is missing some features in its NPAPI implementation regardging
NPRuntime scripting support.
As a result, flash integration with konqueror will have som
On 13-Jul-2007 02:10.42 (BST), Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
> Are there other things that you find iceweasel does better than
> konqueror?
NPRuntime scripting.
--
rob andrews :: pgp 0x01e00563 :: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subj
debianista.deb ha scritto:
hello
I would like to know how can I install flash player in my
mozilla-firefox ? please
Thanks
cheers
debianista.deb
u need to create a 32bit chroot and install firefox and flash inside
that...
follow the howto:
https://alioth.debian.org/docman/view.php
thanks Michele but how can I do chroot ? pleaseOn 10/22/05, Michele Concina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
debianista.deb ha scritto:> hello>> I would like to know how can I install flash player in my
> mozilla-firefox ? please>>> Thanks> cheers> debianista.deb u
ice-et-flash
Jérôme
>
> ---
> Wanadoo vous informe que cet e-mail a ete controle par
> l'anti-virus mail. Aucun virus connu a ce jour par nos services n'a ete
> detecte.
hum okay thanks I'll try to guide it ;)On 10/22/05, FIX Jerome <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Le Samedi 22 Octobre 2005 18:48, debianista.deb a écrit:> thanks Michele but how can I do chroot ? please>I have written a little tutorial about this, but it is in french !
http://zapoyok.dnsalias.com/index.ph
Jeffrey W. Baker wrote:
It's harmless, but is there any way to disable that annoying plugin
downloader? It takes up a lot of screen space.
You can put this little piece of CSS into your chrome/userChrome.css in
your profile:
browsermessage[type=top] {
display: none;
}
Michal
On Thursday 21 September 2006 20:28, Jan De Luyck wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I've got a rarity with Flash and mplayer. With flash, if I play movies from
> e.g. YouTube (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ui5v3APjmp8&eurl= - example)
> the movie is at very high speed - not normal
h the flashplugin in a 32 bit chroot
(Debian etch system). I just tried installing Opera using /lib32
instead according to this Ubuntu blog:
http://porg.es/blog/opera-9-on-ubuntu-dapper-with-amd64
It works fine, including java. I'd like to get the flash player
working also. Is it possible
It may be of interest to those on this list that there is a slashdot thread
<http://ask.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/10/19/1959200> started
this afternoon on the topic of Macromedia's refusal to develop a
solution for Flash on 64-bit Linux. Since it is simply an Ask Slashdot,
there
Could you please verify this bugreport?
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=435912
Thanks,
Max
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
;
> started this afternoon on the topic of Macromedia's refusal to develop a
> solution for Flash on 64-bit Linux. Since it is simply an Ask Slashdot,
> there is no news per se, but the comments may be interesting nonetheless.
of great interest. I've been denied lots of web conte
now this applies to Firefox, I think 64-bit Konqueror can use 32-bit Flash.
> The way I read you, you're campaigning to remove all flash content
> from every web site - not going to happen in a million years. You'd
> be better off campaigning for a amd64 version. Plus Flash adds t
on this and other
lists - re-labelling does not work, because a 64-bit browser would
attempt to run it as a 64-bit plugin. If it ran as a separate process,
it probably would work. But process-independent plugins are just a
pipe dream.
> of great interest. I've been denied lots of web co
fternoon on the topic of Macromedia's refusal to develop a solution for
> Flash on 64-bit Linux. Since it is simply an Ask Slashdot, there is no news
> per se, but the comments may be interesting nonetheless.
I actually tried asking Macromedia for the source code -- and almost got it
is a slashdot
> thread<http://ask.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/10/19/1959200><
> http://ask.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/10/19/1959200> started this
> afternoon on the topic of Macromedia's refusal to develop a solution for
> Flash on 64-bit Linux. Since it is simply an
Hello Lists,
is there a 86_64 version ?
Jerome
Kent West wrote:
Reid Priedhorsky wrote:
Hi all,
Flash Player 9 for Linux came out of beta yesterday. I had a little hiccup
installing it on my Etch box, so I thought I'd share my solution to spare
you the hiccup. I use Firefox version 1.5
This bug is real, and is not present inside my chroot...
When iceweasel lost focus (i386) the flash application don't regain it
until you click inside...
In amd64 never lost the bind to the keyboard...
Take care
On 8/3/07, Max Alekseyev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Could you plea
On Sat, 04 Aug 2007 05:40:08 +0200, Max Alekseyev wrote:
> Could you please verify this bugreport?
I'm afraid I can't reproduce it. While the game is executing I opened a
terminal and could scroll my bash history without problems.
--
Best Regards, Jack
Linux User #264449
Powered by Debian GNU/
Oh,
I read the bug and in my mind iceape~iceweasel my previous
confirmation is with iceweasel
and the other app I use to reproduce it was kword.
Now I confirm the bug is present using
Iceape
Iceweasel
ii iceape 1.0.10~pre070720-0etch1
The Iceape Internet Sui
rapper, can someone with a Debian i386
installation (I'd prefer it not to be a chroot) verify if this happens
when you aren't using nspluginwrapper? Because it could well be a
problem with Adobe's Flash plugin. Unfortunately I don't have any 32-bit
hardware any more (except a
On 04-Aug-2007 10:17.18 (BST), Jack Malmostoso wrote:
> > Could you please verify this bugreport?
> I'm afraid I can't reproduce it. While the game is executing I opened a
> terminal and could scroll my bash history without problems.
What browser are you using? So far we have this behaviour ha
On Sat, 04 Aug 2007 17:20:08 +0200, Rob Andrews wrote:
> What browser are you using?
I have tried with Iceweasel on Sid (2.0.6 or something). Started the
browser, went to the page linked in the bug, started the game, played
three stages (nice game :)), opened a terminal from a button on my pane
On Saturday 04 August 2007 17:10, Rob Andrews wrote:
> Before we blame nspluginwrapper, can someone with a Debian i386
> installation (I'd prefer it not to be a chroot) verify if this happens
> when you aren't using nspluginwrapper? Because it could well be a
> problem wit
El 4 Aug 2007 16:05:00 GMT
Jack Malmostoso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> On Sat, 04 Aug 2007 17:20:08 +0200, Rob Andrews wrote:
>
> > What browser are you using?
>
> I have tried with Iceweasel on Sid (2.0.6 or something). Started the
> browser, went to the page linked in the bug, started the
On Sat, 04 Aug 2007 18:30:13 +0200, Jack Malmostoso wrote:
> I have tried with Iceweasel on Sid (2.0.6 or something). Started the
> browser, went to the page linked in the bug, started the game, played
> three stages (nice game ), opened a terminal from a button on my panel,
> pressed "up" and "do
Reid Priedhorsky wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Flash Player 9 for Linux came out of beta yesterday. I had a little hiccup
>>> installing it on my Etch box, so I thought I'd share my solution to spare
>>> you the hiccup. I use Firefox version 1.5.dfsg+1.
Hello!
Quick search revealed three native amd64 flash plugins for Mozilla:
libflash-mozplugin - GPL Flash (SWF) Library - Mozilla-compatible plugin
mozilla-plugin-gnash - free Flash movie player - Plugin for Mozilla
and derivatives
swf-player - Mozilla plugin for SWF files (Macromedia Flash
On Friday 01 December 2006 20:32, Max A. wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Quick search revealed three native amd64 flash plugins for Mozilla:
>
> libflash-mozplugin - GPL Flash (SWF) Library - Mozilla-compatible plugin
> mozilla-plugin-gnash - free Flash movie player - Plugin for Mozilla
I've installed mozilla-plugin-gnash but it makes my Seamonkey 1.1b
freeze as soon as open website with flash.
It seems that I have to choose something else.
Max
On 12/1/06, Alan Ianson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Friday 01 December 2006 20:32, Max A. wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Q
On Saturday 02 December 2006 15:05, Max A. wrote:
> I've installed mozilla-plugin-gnash but it makes my Seamonkey 1.1b
> freeze as soon as open website with flash.
> It seems that I have to choose something else.
My results were the same. Nice to see there is something happening tho
Max A. escribió:
> Hello!
>
> Quick search revealed three native amd64 flash plugins for Mozilla:
>
> libflash-mozplugin - GPL Flash (SWF) Library - Mozilla-compatible plugin
> mozilla-plugin-gnash - free Flash movie player - Plugin for Mozilla
> and derivatives
> swf-pla
-- Forwarded message --
From: Andrew Syrewicze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Dec 6, 2006 9:08 AM
Subject: Re: Mozilla native amd64 flash plugin: libflash-mozplugin vs.
swf-player vs. mozilla-plugin-gnash
To: "Santiago R. Lunar M." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On 12/6/0
On 12/6/06, Santiago R. Lunar M. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> libflash-mozplugin - GPL Flash (SWF) Library - Mozilla-compatible plugin
[...]
The best way to have flash workin' is installing Gnash, the problem is
that there is no amd64 package for it.
There is package libf
On 12/6/06, Max A. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The best way to have flash workin' is installing Gnash, the problem is
> that there is no amd64 package for it.
There is package libflash-mozplugin for amd64, check:
http://packages.debian.org/unstable/web/libflash-mozplugin
The gnash plugin freezes my Seamonkey
1.1b as soon as I open website with flash. ;(
Max
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've got a different experience. The gnash plugin freezes my Seamonkey
1.1b as soon as I open website with flash. ;(
Max
--
-Andrew Syrewicze
I would be interested if www.pandora.com is working correctly
with gnash ? I'm sorry i'm not yet ready to install my own system,
just far too much backlogs...Just curious, since this site uses flash 9.
And it's a nice thingy ;)
> > > Just felt that this was worth
On 12/7/06, Micha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I would be interested if www.pandora.com is working correctly
with gnash ? I'm sorry i'm not yet ready to install my own system,
just far too much backlogs...Just curious, since this site uses flash 9.
And it's a nice thin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Just felt that this was worth mentioning. There is a gnash package for
> >> AMD64 in the unstable repositories. I've just recently tried it and it
> >> generally seems to work pretty well.
> >
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Max A. escribió:
> On 12/6/06, Santiago R. Lunar M. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>> libflash-mozplugin - GPL Flash (SWF) Library -
>>> Mozilla-compatible
>> plugin
>
> [...]
>
>> The best way to hav
Max A. wrote:
>
> Which one to choose?
maybe you can try also the following:
http://gwenole.beauchesne.info/en/projects/nspluginwrapper
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
201 - 245 of 245 matches
Mail list logo
