Hallo,
maybe a stupid question but I'm using now gcc-3.4 since a bought my
amd64 and I'm quite satisfied with it. (use it as normal workstation and
for me its stable)
As I tried the last apt-get update two days ago I noticed that there
are some differences in the source lists. so I took the new
. Or is it better to switch
back to pure64.
The gcc-3.4 archive is being replaced by the new gcc4 archive which is
compiled from scratch using the freshly released version of gcc-4.0.
The gcc4 archive will be available soon as
deb http://debian-ppc64.alioth.debian.org/gcc4 unstable main contrib non-free
to pure64.
Alois
The amd64 gcc4 (formerly gcc-3.4) archive is moving to
http://debian-ppc64.alioth.debian.org/gcc4/. Please update your
sources.list to continue using gcc4.
It is generally suggested that you downgrade to regular pure64 for
non-development use. However, the gcc4 archive will continue
Andreas Jochens wrote:
If nobody else comes up with a different proposal and
no other problems occur, I would like to change the
name on 2005-03-15 (three weeks from now).
Any news about this?
Regards
Harri
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Monday 04 April 2005 3:16pm, Javier Kohen wrote:
Hi,
I've been using the /gcc-3.4 archive from Alioth. Is there any
difference among that one, debian-gcc-3.4 and debian-pure64-3.4? I mean
a user-noticeable difference, I've read archive-structure and I think I
understand, but gcc-3.4 isn't
Hi,
I've been using the /gcc-3.4 archive from Alioth. Is there any
difference among that one, debian-gcc-3.4 and debian-pure64-3.4? I mean
a user-noticeable difference, I've read archive-structure and I think I
understand, but gcc-3.4 isn't mentioned there and I don't really know
what
Seems some source packages are missing from the 3.4 archive:
$ apt-get source glew
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
E: Unable to find a source package for glew
This happens for several other packages I've tried, but not for
others. For example, 'apt-get source
El lun, 04-04-2005 a las 15:55 -0700, Drew Hess escribi:
Seems some source packages are missing from the 3.4 archive:
$ apt-get source glew
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
E: Unable to find a source package for glew
This happens for several other packages
I am working on a fresh installation from the gcc-3.4 archives. I have most
of the system working well, but kde is badly broken. I think that it is
similiar to the problem discussed on this list in February, caused by a
broken libqt3c102-mt package. Due to a misunderstanding on my part, I had a
Hello,
I'm using the gcc-3.4 archive but I didn't see any new debs in the
recent days.
Looking in http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/gcc-3.4/buildd-logs/ I
can see build-logs from the last few days but I can't find the build
packages in http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/gcc-3.4/pool
On 05-Feb-21 17:48, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
What happens to the gcc-3.4/gcc-4.0 repository is totaly undecided and
I leave that up to Andreas as he is doing all the work on it.
My intention is to continue the gcc-3.4 archive until
Debian officially switches to gcc-4.0 as its default
On Mon, Feb 21, 2005 at 07:37:34PM +0100, Andreas Jochens wrote:
Hopefully, the name change from 'gcc-3.4' to 'gcc4' will not cause too
much trouble for mirrors and current users. For some time the old name
'gcc-3.4' should be still available as a symlink to 'gcc4'.
If you can give us a
Good evening Kurt,
On 05-Feb-21 19:43, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
On Mon, Feb 21, 2005 at 07:37:34PM +0100, Andreas Jochens wrote:
Hopefully, the name change from 'gcc-3.4' to 'gcc4' will not cause too
much trouble for mirrors and current users. For some time the old name
'gcc-3.4' should be
Andreas Jochens [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hopefully, the name change from 'gcc-3.4' to 'gcc4' will not cause too
much trouble for mirrors and current users. For some time the old name
'gcc-3.4' should be still available as a symlink to 'gcc4'.
Regards
Andreas Jochens
I'm going to contact
On Mon, Feb 21, 2005 at 07:58:12PM +0100, Andreas Jochens wrote:
If nobody else comes up with a different proposal and
no other problems occur, I would like to change the
name on 2005-03-15 (three weeks from now).
An exact hour would be nice too.
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Guten Abend Goswin,
On 05-Feb-21 19:59, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
I'm going to contact all mirrors shortly with an update of the new
archive structure and mirror suggestions / sample scripts.
Should I set a date for the namechange, say a week after I send that
mail, and then mv gcc-3.4
On 05-Feb-21 14:04, Per Bojsen wrote:
BTW, a question for Andreas: Are we reporting the GCC 4.0 bugs
upstream? Are the GCC 4.0 developers OK with reports like the above
or do they require narrowing down of the problem to a single source
file or function (which might be time consuming for a
Andreas Jochens [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Good evening Kurt,
On 05-Feb-21 19:43, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
On Mon, Feb 21, 2005 at 07:37:34PM +0100, Andreas Jochens wrote:
Hopefully, the name change from 'gcc-3.4' to 'gcc4' will not cause too
much trouble for mirrors and current users. For
there is almost a whole tree compiled with it :). Should I grab the
sources from any official debian mirror as they are or are there any amd64
specific patches to apply?
The gcc-3.4 archive, which uses gcc-4.0 to compile its packages since
December 2004, of course has gcc-4.0 packages available
On 04-Dec-13 23:00, Grant Wilson wrote:
On my x86 box I have no problems with version 2.3.2.ds1-19 of libc6 and
the same kernel (2.6.10-rc3), so this looks to be either a 64 bit
problem or a gcc4 problem (or both).
Thank you for the report.
This version of libc6 has still been compiled with
Hi,
I've been investigating a problem where attempting to export NFS file
systems or to mount remote NFS file systems fail with RPC: failed to
contact portmap (errno -5) logged by the nfsd. Running the portmapper
in verbose mode it reports a failure on a call of svc_sendreply.
By regressing
On 04-Nov-19 15:50, Pete Harlan wrote:
There's a weblint directory, it just doesn't have anything in it. I'm
trying to install html2ps, which depends on it.
This is a general non amd64 specific bug in html2ps.
The weblint package has been removed from the sid distribution.
Please look at BTS
On 04-Aug-11 02:57, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Andreas Jochens [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The amd64/gcc-3.4 archive (http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/gcc-3.4)
finally supports the compilation and linking of 32bit i386 binaries
using the gcc '-m32' switch. The gcc-3.4 package
The amd64/gcc-3.4 archive (http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/gcc-3.4)
finally supports the compilation and linking of 32bit i386 binaries
using the gcc '-m32' switch. The gcc-3.4 package in the amd64/gcc-3.4
archive has been recompiled with the '--enable-multilib' option
which causes all
24 matches
Mail list logo
