On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 12:08:38PM +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote:
>
> You should mention the sources.list for this. AFAIK its
>
> deb http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/gcc-3.4/ unstable main non-free
> contrib
> deb-src http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/gcc-3.4/ unstable main
> non-free co
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 12 August 2004 14:26, Anders Fugmann wrote:
> Andreas Jochens wrote:
...
>
> My steps were:
> 1) change asources list to use the new repository
> 2) apt-get update
> 3) apt-get dist-upgrade
> 4) apt-get remove libstdc++5
> 5) apt-get --get-
On Thu, Aug 12, 2004 at 02:59:31AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > The netboot and monolithic ISOs are small enough that I'd guess they
> > don't install their own packages, but they are reported not to work
> > with the gcc-3.4 archive because it only has sid, not
> > testing/unstable, whic
Andreas Jochens wrote:
As for stability, I am using the packages from the amd64/gcc-3.4 archive
myself on three machines (on my main desktop and on two servers) since a
few weeks without any problems. From my own experience I would say
that the stability is almost the same as for i386/unstable.
I
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Pete Harlan) writes:
> On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 12:08:38PM +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote:
>> Andreas Jochens wrote:
>> >As for stability, I am using the packages from the amd64/gcc-3.4 archive
>> >myself on three machines (on my main desktop and on two servers) since a
>> >few week
On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 12:08:38PM +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> Andreas Jochens wrote:
> >As for stability, I am using the packages from the amd64/gcc-3.4 archive
> >myself on three machines (on my main desktop and on two servers) since a
> >few weeks without any problems. From my own experience
On 04-Aug-11 12:08, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> You should mention the sources.list for this. AFAIK its
>
> deb http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/gcc-3.4/ unstable main non-free
> contrib
> deb-src http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/gcc-3.4/ unstable main
> non-free contrib
This is correct. S
Andreas Jochens wrote:
There has not been any decision whether the pure64/gcc-3.3 archive will
be dropped in favor the the amd64/gcc-3.4 archive. There are some 300
packages more available in the pure64/gcc-3.3 archive than in the
amd64/gcc-3.4 amd64/gcc-3.4 at the moment (~8300 vs. ~8000 packages
On 04-Aug-11 09:42, Andreas Kn?pfer wrote:
> hi everybody,
>
> there has been some posts here a while ago saying that the /gcc-3.4
> repository
> is not yet ready, missing packages etc...
>
> now, i'm wondering if it is ready for regular use. is it regarded as stable
> as
> the /pure64 versio
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
hi everybody,
there has been some posts here a while ago saying that the /gcc-3.4 repository
is not yet ready, missing packages etc...
now, i'm wondering if it is ready for regular use. is it regarded as stable as
the /pure64 version?
i'd like to
10 matches
Mail list logo