Re: glibc on kfreebsd-amd64 (was: Re: segfaults on amd64, one more update)

2006-02-28 Thread Robert Millan
On Sun, Feb 26, 2006 at 09:13:37PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote: > On Sun, Feb 26, 2006 at 07:59:21PM +0100, Petr Salinger wrote: > > Hello Robert, > > > > one more update, please could you test > > with sysdeps/x86_64/elf/start.S from previous mail > > and enclosed sysdeps/x86_64/dl-machine.h > >

Re: glibc on kfreebsd-amd64 (was: Re: segfaults on amd64, one more update)

2006-02-26 Thread Robert Millan
On Sun, Feb 26, 2006 at 09:13:37PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote: > > Works!! > > More complex programs like grep work fine, too. I'm running glibc testsuite > now, and will run coreutils testsuite within a few minutes. I have committed the list of testsuite failures in trunk/glibc-2.3-head/AMD64.

Re: glibc on kfreebsd-amd64 (was: Re: segfaults on amd64, one more update)

2006-02-26 Thread Guillem Jover
On Sun, Feb 26, 2006 at 09:13:37PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote: > On Sun, Feb 26, 2006 at 07:59:21PM +0100, Petr Salinger wrote: > > one more update, please could you test > > with sysdeps/x86_64/elf/start.S from previous mail > > and enclosed sysdeps/x86_64/dl-machine.h > > > > iff it works, I w

glibc on kfreebsd-amd64 (was: Re: segfaults on amd64, one more update)

2006-02-26 Thread Robert Millan
On Sun, Feb 26, 2006 at 07:59:21PM +0100, Petr Salinger wrote: > Hello Robert, > > one more update, please could you test > with sysdeps/x86_64/elf/start.S from previous mail > and enclosed sysdeps/x86_64/dl-machine.h > > iff it works, I will write something better, > but for test this should