cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=363528
(I should mention that I can use gpg from the command line without
errors)
--
Running on testing, AMD64, Kernel 2.6.17-2
Seahorse : 0.9.5-2
any ideas?
with best regards,
Erle Pereira, Systems Consultant
web: http://www.erlepereira.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 02:02:30AM +0100, Francesco Namuri wrote:
> hi,
>
> when i execute "apt-get update" twice the first time I not have any problem,
> the second time
> I got: "W: GPG error: http://ftp.it.debian.org testing Release: Unknown error
> executi
hi,
when i execute "apt-get update" twice the first time I not have any problem,
the second time
I got: "W: GPG error: http://ftp.it.debian.org testing Release: Unknown error
executing gpgv"
any ideas?
I check for the key of the mirror, it's in my keyring...
thanks
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>> During
>>>>>
>>>>> # apt-get update
>>>>>
>>>>> I received the
>>>>>
>>>>> "GPG error ... NO_PUBKEY 22DB56F984478DDF"
>>>>&g
IGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hmmm... it appears that the package debian-archive-keyring is new at
least to my local mirror which I have just updated today. fgd.
J. Paul Bissonnette wrote:
rainer herrendoerfer wrote:
Hi,
During
# apt-get update
I received the
"GPG error ...
pt-get update
>>
>> I received the
>>
>> "GPG error ... NO_PUBKEY 22DB56F984478DDF"
>>
>> I tried
>>
>> # gpg --keyserver wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net --recv-keys 22DB56F984478DDF
>>
>> but:
>> gpg: requesting key 84478DDF from hkp
rainer herrendoerfer wrote:
Hi,
During
# apt-get update
I received the
"GPG error ... NO_PUBKEY 22DB56F984478DDF"
I tried
# gpg --keyserver wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net --recv-keys 22DB56F984478DDF
but:
gpg: requesting key 84478DDF from hkp server wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net
gpgkeys: key 22DB56
Sorry,
buggy sources.list! I had a local file in it. Removed and now everything
works fine again.
Thanks for your efford, have a nice evening
Raina
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
y
sub 2048g/34FC6FE5 2005-04-24
pub 1024D/2D230C5F 2006-01-03 [expires: 2007-02-07]
uid Debian Archive Automatic Signing Key (2006)
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
So as I understand if I get a GPG error with NO_PUBKEY 22DB56F984478DDF
I have to fetch it with sth. like (quote from y
On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 04:39:44PM +0100, rainer herrendoerfer wrote:
> Hi,
> During
>
> # apt-get update
>
> I received the
>
> "GPG error ... NO_PUBKEY 22DB56F984478DDF"
And from where are you trying to download something? Maybe this
is some package repo
It depends on what package your are trying to install. Is the package
signed with a key that would be on wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net? What repository
is the package from?
rainer herrendoerfer wrote:
> Hi,
> During
>
> # apt-get update
>
> I received the
>
> "GPG error ..
Hi,
During
# apt-get update
I received the
"GPG error ... NO_PUBKEY 22DB56F984478DDF"
I tried
# gpg --keyserver wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net --recv-keys 22DB56F984478DDF
but:
gpg: requesting key 84478DDF from hkp server wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net
gpgkeys: key 22DB56F984478DDF not found on
sigi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
>> > today I tried to update my debian-system, but there was a problem to
>> > authenticate the gpg-keys:
>> >
>> >>-----<
>>
> But why do I have these problems since yesterday? And why do I have the
> wrong keys for _all_ my sources on my list since yesterday (not only
> for the debian-servers)?
Don't know it yet...
> How/Where can I correct this?
wget http://amd64.debian.net/archive.key
apt-key add archive.key
Hi,
> > today I tried to update my debian-system, but there was a problem to
> > authenticate the gpg-keys:
> >
> >>---------<
> > W: GPG error: ftp://ftp.nerim.net etch Release:
> > The
sigi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> today I tried to update my debian-system, but there was a problem to
> authenticate the gpg-keys:
>
>>-----<
> W: GPG error: ftp://ftp.nerim.net etch Rel
most of the packages on my mirros (espri.arizona.edu) aren't
authenticated either. I'd like to hear any information on this as
well.
Hi,
today I tried to update my debian-system, but there was a problem to
authenticate the gpg-keys:
>-<
W: GPG error: ftp://ftp.nerim.net etch Release:
The following signatures couldn't be verified because the pu
On Wednesday 28 September 2005 09:15, Marko Kaiser wrote:
> Read this:
>
> http://cvs.cinelerra.org/getting_cinelerra.html
>
> Regards,
> Marko
That helps thanks.
Would you know where to get the keys for the following?
W: GPG error: file: sarge Release: The following sign
Did that. Still get "untrusted source" for liblame0.
Using deb http://spello.sscnet.ucla.edu/marillat/ sid main
ran
gpg --keyserver hkp://wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net --recv-keys 1F41B907
gpg --armor --export 1F41B907 | sudo apt-key add -
no errors.
Is this keyring for spello.sscnet.ucla
Read this:
http://cvs.cinelerra.org/getting_cinelerra.html
Regards,
Marko
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wednesday 28 September 2005 03:11, Marko Kaiser wrote:
> Hello,
>
> get dists/sid/Release.gpg and add that key via apt-key add.
>
> Bye,
> Marko
grover:/home/ed# apt-key add marillat_Release.gpg
gpg: no valid OpenPGP data found.
grover:/home/ed# cat marillat_Release.
Hello,
get dists/sid/Release.gpg and add that key via apt-key add.
Bye,
Marko
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Anyone know how to get apt to accept packages from
http://spello.sscnet.ucla.edu/marillat/ sid main as trusted?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
antongiulio05 wrote:
> Hi Corey,
>
> I have launched your script in my chroot (after installed 'hwtools'), but I
> got these errors:
>
> $ sh temptests.sh all
> Running test: test_idle
> cat: /sys/bus/i2c/devices/0-0290/temp1_input: No such file or directory
> temptests.sh: line 85: / 1000: syn
;killall cfdisk'. After a few of seconds, I read again CPU working ~99%. Top
show 'top' self use my cpu 99% and 'killall' again. It's same thing with 'gpg'
at start of this thread.
Have you any idea?
Thanks,
Giulio
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PR
> You should also try burnK7 of the cpuburn package. Unfortunately there
> isn't an amd64 deb of cpuburn, but it works fine in my i386 chroot.
>
> This thread inspired me to run a few tests to see what program makes my
> CPU run the hottest. My somewhat overclocked machine had been running
> for o
Dne ne 10. července 2005 1:51 Miroslav Maiksnar napsal(a):
> I just out of curiosity tried burnK7 on my nearly 2y old A64 3200+ (oldest
> 2GHz 754 socket version) and after 15 minutes CPU raises from 42 to 43
> degrees (using ondemand governor I have 800MHz idle), but system
> temperature raises fr
Dne so 9. července 2005 20:07 Corey Hickey napsal(a):
> You should also try burnK7 of the cpuburn package. Unfortunately there
> isn't an amd64 deb of cpuburn, but it works fine in my i386 chroot.
>
> This thread inspired me to run a few tests to see what program makes my
> CPU run the hottest. My
antongiulio05 wrote:
>>>At start, notebook temperature was for thermal 1: 40 C and thermal 2: 47 C
>>>(from 'acpi -V'). Running command above (and so 'gpg' process) my system
>>>becomes unstable (auto key pressing etc.), and temperature is jumped
On Fri, 8 Jul 2005, antongiulio05 wrote:
Yes:) However I'm running (how Gnu-Raiz suggests) "prime 95" to stress
processor. Temperature is constant. And it doesn't show unstability. I'll continue test
for many hours again.
Heat problems can be intermittent. Heat is regulated by some of the mo
> > At start, notebook temperature was for thermal 1: 40 C and thermal 2: 47 C
> > (from 'acpi -V'). Running command above (and so 'gpg' process) my system
> > becomes unstable (auto key pressing etc.), and temperature is jumped to 55
> > C for
On Thu, 7 Jul 2005, antongiulio05 wrote:
At start, notebook temperature was for thermal 1: 40 C and thermal 2: 47 C
(from 'acpi -V'). Running command above (and so 'gpg' process) my system
becomes unstable (auto key pressing etc.), and temperature is jumped to 55 C
for
On 20:06, Thu 07 Jul 05, antongiulio05 wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this is not a joke:)
> Reading posts about GPG-errors for last apt version, I have launched:
>
> apt-key add keyfile.
>
> At start, notebook temperature was for thermal 1: 40 C and thermal 2: 47 C
> (from '
yYvkAJ9FnlqAN3VTaLqMv6riY5OZ8Q8IqACfQdLinAPJsjAVtcg1UWUC7owKlm+I
21c19,21
< nACeN9G21iPzqOi3Ewmf3woQcwf4wTS5Ag0EQmvPMxAIAOr1j+gORprF8BnY2/yJ
---
> nACeN9G21iPzqOi3Ewmf3woQcwf4wTSIXgQTEQIAHgUCQmvPKwIbAwYLCQgHAwID
> FQIDAxYCAQIeAQIXgAAKCRDkFbK0tfW77VJ0AJ9Mo/oqzyumFCVQvWYVvxBsjk6e
> wgCfZZRNf/DR6
> I tried your settings in XF86Config-4. Sad, they do not work, same as before.
> Monitor gets bright, whren switching to konsole. It seems to be a hardware
> problem. Nevertheless, with your settings, the screen was not so nice as mine
> (my personal meaning :)) ) So, maybe, you will try my one
Am Donnerstag, 7. Juli 2005 21:35 schrieb antongiulio05:
> > What do you have for a performance with youre XF86Config-Settings ? I
> > have about 3220 FPS with glxgears ( in KDE, fvwm is a little bit faster).
>
> I have same performances suppose:
> $ glxgears
> 13341 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2668.20
> What do you have for a performance with youre XF86Config-Settings ? I have
> about 3220 FPS with glxgears ( in KDE, fvwm is a little bit faster).
I have same performances suppose:
$ glxgears
13341 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2668.200 FPS
15442 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3088.400 FPS
16026 frames in 5.
Am Donnerstag, 7. Juli 2005 21:03 schrieb antongiulio05:
> Hi Hans,
Hi Gulio,
> > sam to me. I also have an Acer1524WLMI, but everytime I use apt the
> > cooler begins to run. Don worry, this seems to be o.k. I suppose, apt is
> > using all the processing time, and so the AMD64-processor is getting
Hi Hans,
> sam to me. I also have an Acer1524WLMI, but everytime I use apt the cooler
> begins to run. Don worry, this seems to be o.k. I suppose, apt is using all
> the processing time, and so the AMD64-processor is getting hot. Remember, it
> so not a mobile-processor.
CPU on my nb runs with
Am Donnerstag, 7. Juli 2005 20:06 schrieb antongiulio05:
> Hi,
>
> this is not a joke:)
> Reading posts about GPG-errors for last apt version, I have launched:
>
> apt-key add keyfile.
>
> At start, notebook temperature was for thermal 1: 40 C and thermal 2: 47 C
>
Hi,
this is not a joke:)
Reading posts about GPG-errors for last apt version, I have launched:
apt-key add keyfile.
At start, notebook temperature was for thermal 1: 40 C and thermal 2: 47 C
(from 'acpi -V'). Running command above (and so 'gpg' process) my system
become
Clive Menzies said on Sun, Jul 03, 2005 at 04:30:12PM +0100,:
> Try installing gnupg first (which will generate the untrusted sources
> error but go ahead anyway) and then try again. I use aptitude. As root:
> # aptitude install gnupg
> # aptitude update
I had gnupg, and was geting the sa
Harald Dunkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Joerg Jaspert wrote:
>> On 10339 March 1977, Harald Dunkel wrote:
>>
>>
>>>>W: GPG error: http://amd64.debian.net unstable Release: The following
>>>>signatures couldn't be verified
On (03/07/05 17:21), Harald Dunkel wrote:
> Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> > On 10339 March 1977, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> >
> >
> >>>W: GPG error: http://amd64.debian.net unstable Release: The following
> >>>signatures couldn't be verified becaus
Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> On 10339 March 1977, Harald Dunkel wrote:
>
>
>>>W: GPG error: http://amd64.debian.net unstable Release: The following
>>>signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available:
>>>NO_PUBKEY E415B2B4B5F5BBED
&g
On Sun, Jul 03, 2005 at 04:13:50PM +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote:
>
> Anybody out there?
Maybe you should read my reply? Or any of the others that where
on the list about the same subject?
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMA
On 10339 March 1977, Harald Dunkel wrote:
>> W: GPG error: http://amd64.debian.net unstable Release: The following
>> signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available:
>> NO_PUBKEY E415B2B4B5F5BBED
>> W: You may want to run apt-get upd
Harald Dunkel wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> There seems to be some problem with the signatures:
>
>
> # apt-get update
> :
> :
> Get:4 http://amd64.debian.net unstable Release.gpg [189B]
> :
> :
> Fetched 3683kB in 31s (118kB/s)
> Reading package lists... Done
Harald Dunkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> There seems to be some problem with the signatures:
> [...]
> W: GPG error: http://amd64.debian.net unstable Release: The following
> signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not
> available: NO_PUBKEY E415B2B4
On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 10:17:51PM +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> :
> Fetched 3683kB in 31s (118kB/s)
> Reading package lists... Done
> W: GPG error: http://amd64.debian.net unstable Release: The following
> signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not ava
Hi folks,
There seems to be some problem with the signatures:
# apt-get update
:
:
Get:4 http://amd64.debian.net unstable Release.gpg [189B]
:
:
Fetched 3683kB in 31s (118kB/s)
Reading package lists... Done
W: GPG error: http://amd64.debian.net unstable Release: The following
signatures
Thomas Koeppen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> a apt-get gpg-key issue occured in my box after last apt-get upgrade,
> I found no similiar reported behaviour in this list.
It has just been reported on this list. See the "verification of
packages with gnupg/apt-key" thread.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 10:24:09PM +0200, Thomas Koeppen wrote:
>
>>thank you,
>>that's the same i did manually (got key from wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net) and so issue
>>was fixed.
>>Perhaps there is any explanation, why this "new" key fr
On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 10:24:09PM +0200, Thomas Koeppen wrote:
> thank you,
> that's the same i did manually (got key from wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net) and so issue
> was fixed.
> Perhaps there is any explanation, why this "new" key from april is required
> since yesterday and all
> my updates work well
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 09:05:06PM +0200, Thomas Koeppen wrote:
>
>>a apt-get gpg-key issue occured in my box after last apt-get upgrade,
>>I found no similiar reported behaviour in this list.
>>(i
On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 09:05:06PM +0200, Thomas Koeppen wrote:
>
> a apt-get gpg-key issue occured in my box after last apt-get upgrade,
> I found no similiar reported behaviour in this list.
> (i've been updating from amd64.debian.net since archive move many times
> without
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
sorry, my last post not encrypted now, see below.
Thomas
- Original Message
Subject: GPG error: http://amd64.debian.net sid Release: ... NO_PUBKEY
E415B2B4B5F5 BBED
Resent-Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 13:55:29 -0500 (CDT)
Resent-From
-BEGIN PGP MESSAGE-
Charset: ISO-8859-1
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
hQIOA7elC0E0/G/lEAgAlbutJj9sUTBAaEC6ca+k68OltqNhVCzA0uiCAaRQIMZ0
TQZy1T0P0/MgC2VoY0bEA8pJTgeLADT65QISH0ajrptPVRU2P4zm3fyfC0+rJQm3
EEpe1ljZ1Mf1tjZ2Jne
I seen that the amd64 ist also at the normal ftp-server. There i found the
key. The key I describe in the last mail was a false one.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Markus Boas wrote:
An which keyserver is the gpg key of the amd64 mirror.
I search für the
pub 1024D/B5F5BBED 2005-04-24
Key fingerprint = C20C A1D9 499D ECBB D8BD ACF9 E415 B2B4 B5F5 BBED
uid Debian AMD64 Archive Key
sub 2048g/34FC6FE5 2005-04-24
but I found
An which keyserver is the gpg key of the amd64 mirror.
I search für the
pub 1024D/B5F5BBED 2005-04-24
Key fingerprint = C20C A1D9 499D ECBB D8BD ACF9 E415 B2B4 B5F5 BBED
uid Debian AMD64 Archive Key
sub 2048g/34FC6FE5 2005-04-24
but I found him not.
thx
Peter Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi, my mirror of the amd64 archive recently broke becaues of the
> following errors:
>
> gpg: Signature made Thu Jan 20 17:40:22 2005 EST using DSA key ID 2FE487B0
> gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found
> gpg: Si
Hi, my mirror of the amd64 archive recently broke becaues of the
following errors:
gpg: Signature made Thu Jan 20 17:40:22 2005 EST using DSA key ID 2FE487B0
gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found
gpg: Signature made Thu Jan 20 17:40:22 2005 EST using DSA key ID 2FE487B0
gpg:
64 matches
Mail list logo
