I have updated from etch to lenny (UMA type machine dual opterons raid1) by
just replacing "etch" with "lenny" in sources.list. Got a single error while
processing
/var/cache/apt/archives/libsc7_2.3.1-3_amd64.deb
Running
#apt-get -f install
reported the same error.
I remember that library wa
I forgot to mention that libsc-dev has unmet dependencies, depending on libsc7
(= 2.3.1-3)
--- On Mon, 5/5/08, Francesco Pietra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Francesco Pietra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: libsc7_2.3.1-3_amd64.deb problems
> To: "debian64"
Francesco Pietra 09:43 Mon 05 May
Also a naive question: why all those deb packages in /var/cache/apt/archives ?
To save download time if needed again later.
Every so often they fill up /var on me (I tend to update manually almost
every day) and then things stop working
On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 01:56:22PM -0400, C. Ahlstrom wrote:
> Francesco Pietra 09:43 Mon 05 May
>
> >Also a naive question: why all those deb packages in
> >/var/cache/apt/archives ?
>
> To save download time if needed again later.
>
> Every so often they fill up /var on
On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 09:43:05AM -0700, Francesco Pietra wrote:
>
> /var/cache/apt/archives/libsc7_2.3.1-3_amd64.deb
>
> I remember that library was in connection with a quantum-mechanical
> computation program "mpqc" (from the Sandja lab), which is deb packaged but
> which is no more installed
On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 09:43:05AM -0700, Francesco Pietra wrote:
> I have updated from etch to lenny (UMA type machine dual opterons raid1) by
> just replacing "etch" with "lenny" in sources.list. Got a single error while
> processing
>
> /var/cache/apt/archives/libsc7_2.3.1-3_amd64.deb
what e
On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 08:39:26PM -0400, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
> Run aptitude with no parameters and enter the interactive interface.
> Run a search on libsc7 and see. Actually its not a long list, here it
> is:
> ghemical
> libghemical0c2a
> libsc-dev
> mpqc
"apt-cache
ear to damage the system
Thanks for advice
francesco pietra
--- On Mon, 5/5/08, Lennart Sorensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Lennart Sorensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: libsc7_2.3.1-3_amd64.deb problems
> To: "C. Ahlstrom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
&
On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 12:57:43AM -0700, Francesco Pietra wrote:
> Hi:
> Following
>
> # apt-get clean
>
> then
>
> #apt-get update
> #apt-get upgrade
>
> the system was no more complaining about libsc7, though it was about
> libsc7-dev (unmet dependencies as it depends from libsc7). Suggeste
If I carry out the same commands with i386 (where mpqc is still installed), for
libsc7 there is one line more "libghemical0c2a", while for libsc8 the answer is
"no package found".
Thanks
francesco pietra
--- On Tue, 5/6/08, Lennart Sorensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> If I carry out the same commands with i386 (where mpqc is still installed),
> for libsc7 there is one line more "libghemical0c2a", while for libsc8 the
> answer is "no package found".
>
>
> Thanks
> francesco pietra
>
>
>
> --- On Tue, 5/6/08, Lennart
On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 08:53:27AM -0700, Francesco Pietra wrote:
> Hi:
> Sorry for this lengthy dealing with libsc7/libsc8, though I would like to
> clean the system, i.e. not to have these issues raised at each "apt-get
> upgrade". Actually, now "apt-get upgrade" only results in:
>
> Reading p
e would be the same.
Thanks
francesco pietra
--- On Tue, 5/6/08, Lennart Sorensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Lennart Sorensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: libsc7_2.3.1-3_amd64.deb problems
> To: "Francesco Pietra" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: "
On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 10:04:06AM -0700, Francesco Pietra wrote:
> Hi:
> I found an e-mail from you dated Aug 22 2006 (and about amd64) that may
> clarify:
>
> > Aimed at reinstalling mpqc 2.3.1 from scratch, I also wanted to reinstall
> > required tk8.4 and libsc8 (although "apt-cache show" sh
> From: Lennart Sorensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: libsc7_2.3.1-3_amd64.deb problems
> To: "Francesco Pietra" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: "C. Ahlstrom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "debian64"
>
> Date: Tuesday, May 6, 2008, 9:32 A
On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 11:33:54AM -0700, Francesco Pietra wrote:
> I have tried with synaptic.
>
> (1) marking libsc8 (which was installed) for removal and unmarking
> libsc7_2.3.1-3_amd64.deb (which was not installed), a dist-upgrade is carried
> out, ending in the same error:
>
> E: /var/cac
On 6 May, 2008, at 19:04, Francesco Pietra wrote:
___
Well, from present information is it possible to indicate how to
remove those files/scripts that generate the error messages, and let
lenny do upgrading correctly? Someone has kindly suggested to carry
out again a dist-upgrade, thoug
ue, 5/6/08, Lennart Sorensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Lennart Sorensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: libsc7_2.3.1-3_amd64.deb problems
> To: "Francesco Pietra" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: "C. Ahlstrom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "d
18 matches
Mail list logo
