Re: nvidia building from source (2.6.15)

Sebastian Haase wrote: On Wednesday 05 April 2006 23:43, Jo Shields wrote: Sebastian Haase wrote: snip Thanks (I'm back ...) - Sebastian Haase Build one. Add a normal 32-bit mirror's deb-src to /etc/apt/sources.list (e.g. deb-src http://mirror.ox.ac.uk/debian unstable

Re: nvidia building from source (2.6.15)

Sebastian Haase wrote: On Wednesday 05 April 2006 17:12, David Liontooth wrote: Jo Shields wrote: Sebastian Haase wrote: On Wednesday 05 April 2006 13:38, you wrote: On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 12:05:57PM -0800, Sebastian Haase wrote: Thanks for the reply.

Re: nvidia building from source (2.6.15)

Jo Shields wrote: Sebastian Haase wrote: On Wednesday 05 April 2006 17:12, David Liontooth wrote: Jo Shields wrote: Sebastian Haase wrote: On Wednesday 05 April 2006 13:38, you wrote: On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 12:05:57PM -0800, Sebastian Haase wrote: Thanks

Re: nvidia building from source (2.6.15)

On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 02:37:36PM -0700, David Liontooth wrote: I ran nvidia 7676 for 2.6.14, but had to upgrade to 8178-3 for 2.6.16. Not sure about 2.6.15. To build the package, I install nvidia-kernel-source, cd /usr/src/linux (where I have the kernel) and make-kpkg -rev 1

Re: nvidia building from source (2.6.15)

On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 02:06:35PM -0800, Sebastian Haase wrote: Thanks for the reply - as I said the only 8178 I found claimed to be only for i386. Just because you only see i386 doens't mean the source package can't be compiled with dpkg-buildpackage on amd64 (it can, quite well) Now, I

Re: nvidia building from source (2.6.15)

mmm... btw... for the ones that don't use DRI at all.. is there any single advantage of nvidia propietary driver over nv? Rafael Rodríguez El Jueves, 6 de Abril de 2006 14:55, Lennart Sorensen escribió: On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 02:37:36PM -0700, David Liontooth wrote: I ran nvidia 7676 for

Re: nvidia building from source (2.6.15)

On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 03:29:18PM +0200, Rafael Rodr?guez wrote: mmm... btw... for the ones that don't use DRI at all.. is there any single advantage of nvidia propietary driver over nv? Supports newer chips sooner than x.org That's about it. Not sure you can do dual head on the x.org

Re: nvidia building from source (2.6.15)

Temperature control is built only in the nvidia driver (nvidia-settings tool displays it in 6xxx models and upwards), as well. --- sigi [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 09:37:22AM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote: On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 03:29:18PM +0200, Rafael Rodr?guez

Re: nvidia building from source (2.6.15)

Len, Thanks for the reply. Could you be little more verbose on what dpkg-source -x nvidia*dsc means !? Where do I get the nvidia*dsc file(s) ? Does dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -us -uc -b automatically try to get all the build-dependencies ? Thanks, Sebastian Haase On Tuesday 04 April

Re: nvidia building from source (2.6.15)

On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 09:10:42AM -0800, Sebastian Haase wrote: Len, Thanks for the reply. Could you be little more verbose on what dpkg-source -x nvidia*dsc means !? Where do I get the nvidia*dsc file(s) ? Does dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -us -uc -b automatically try to get all the

Re: nvidia building from source (2.6.15)

I don't know if you knew this already, but I had to apply some patches to 1.0-8178 found in the NVIDIA forums in order to get everything working properly for 2.6.14+. http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showthread.php?s=050a38613ebb399cc07314ea5e6d04e4t=62021 I'm running Sarge AMD64 with kernel

Re: nvidia building from source (2.6.15)

On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 12:47:00PM -0700, Micheal Waltz wrote: I don't know if you knew this already, but I had to apply some patches to 1.0-8178 found in the NVIDIA forums in order to get everything working properly for 2.6.14+. 8178-3 includes the patches for 2.6.16

Re: nvidia building from source (2.6.15)

On Wednesday 05 April 2006 11:43, you wrote: On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 09:10:42AM -0800, Sebastian Haase wrote: Len, Thanks for the reply. Could you be little more verbose on what dpkg-source -x nvidia*dsc means !? Where do I get the nvidia*dsc file(s) ? Does dpkg-buildpackage

Re: nvidia building from source (2.6.15)

On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 12:05:57PM -0800, Sebastian Haase wrote: Thanks for the reply. (Just for reference I just found http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/apt-howto/ch-sourcehandling.en.html BUT: In all places I found (including http://people.debian.org/~rdonald/nvidia/...) there seems to

Re: nvidia building from source (2.6.15)

Sebastian Haase wrote: Len, Thanks for the reply. Could you be little more verbose on what dpkg-source -x nvidia*dsc means !? Where do I get the nvidia*dsc file(s) ? Does dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -us -uc -b automatically try to get all the build-dependencies ? Thanks, Sebastian Haase

Re: nvidia building from source (2.6.15)

On Wednesday 05 April 2006 13:38, you wrote: On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 12:05:57PM -0800, Sebastian Haase wrote: Thanks for the reply. (Just for reference I just found http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/apt-howto/ch-sourcehandling.en.html BUT: In all places I found (including

Re: nvidia building from source (2.6.15)

Sebastian Haase wrote: On Wednesday 05 April 2006 13:38, you wrote: On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 12:05:57PM -0800, Sebastian Haase wrote: Thanks for the reply. (Just for reference I just found http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/apt-howto/ch-sourcehandling.en.html BUT: In all places I found

Re: nvidia building from source (2.6.15)

Jo Shields wrote: Sebastian Haase wrote: On Wednesday 05 April 2006 13:38, you wrote: On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 12:05:57PM -0800, Sebastian Haase wrote: Thanks for the reply. (Just for reference I just found http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/apt-howto/ch-sourcehandling.en.html BUT: In

Re: nvidia building from source (2.6.15)

Sebastian Haase wrote: On Wednesday 05 April 2006 17:12, David Liontooth wrote: Jo Shields wrote: Sebastian Haase wrote: On Wednesday 05 April 2006 13:38, you wrote: On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 12:05:57PM -0800, Sebastian Haase wrote: Thanks for the reply.

Re: nvidia building from source (2.6.15)

David Liontooth wrote: Sebastian Haase wrote: On Wednesday 05 April 2006 17:12, David Liontooth wrote: Jo Shields wrote: Sebastian Haase wrote: On Wednesday 05 April 2006 13:38, you wrote: On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 12:05:57PM -0800, Sebastian Haase wrote: Thanks

Re: nvidia building from source (2.6.15)

Sebastian Haase wrote: David Liontooth wrote: Sebastian Haase wrote: On Wednesday 05 April 2006 17:12, David Liontooth wrote: Jo Shields wrote: Sebastian Haase wrote: On Wednesday 05 April 2006 13:38, you wrote: On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 12:05:57PM -0800, Sebastian Haase

nvidia building from source (2.6.15)

Hi, I'm running kernel version 2.6.15 from backports (2.6.15-1-amd64-k8-smp) Then I tried to build the nvidia kernel module after dpkg -i linux-headers-2.6.15-1...(also from backports) when trying to build the nvidia-kernel-source (following the instructions in /usr/share/doc/nvidia-kernel-source

Re: nvidia building from source (2.6.15)

On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 10:24:19AM -0800, Sebastian Haase wrote: Hi, I'm running kernel version 2.6.15 from backports (2.6.15-1-amd64-k8-smp) Then I tried to build the nvidia kernel module after dpkg -i linux-headers-2.6.15-1...(also from backports) when trying to build the

Re: nvidia building from source (2.6.15)

On Tuesday 04 April 2006 11:29, you wrote: On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 10:24:19AM -0800, Sebastian Haase wrote: Hi, I'm running kernel version 2.6.15 from backports (2.6.15-1-amd64-k8-smp) Then I tried to build the nvidia kernel module after dpkg -i linux-headers-2.6.15-1...(also from