Re: offtopic general help with system clock

2004-11-14 Thread Bob Proulx
Alex Perry wrote: hardware clock). Once the clock is close, by using this method, the ntp will always be able to keep it on time from then onwards. Agreed. To check if ntp is in a happy state, use the 'ntpq -p' command. ntpq -p Look for low fractional jitter numbers and low offset

Re: offtopic general help with system clock

2004-11-14 Thread Stephen Waters
On Sun, 2004-11-14 at 12:05 -0700, Bob Proulx wrote: Alex Perry wrote: hardware clock). Once the clock is close, by using this method, the ntp will always be able to keep it on time from then onwards. Agreed. To check if ntp is in a happy state, use the 'ntpq -p' command. ntpq -p

Re: offtopic general help with system clock

2004-11-12 Thread Ernest ter Kuile
I think it's best not to install package adjtimex along ntp as they try to do the same thing (keep the system on time). ntp server will indeed no set the time if it's way off. However, Setting the time to a wild approximation (+/- 1 hour) of the current time is usually enough for ntp to

Re: offtopic general help with system clock

2004-11-12 Thread Alex Perry
The debian package ntpdate has the purpose of initializing the clock to a sane value on boot (so it is even usable on machines with a broken hardware clock). Once the clock is close, by using this method, the ntp will always be able to keep it on time from then onwards. If you're concerned

offtopic general help with system clock

2004-10-29 Thread Stephen Waters
OK, so if your system clock is way off and NTP doesn't work, try this before blaming hardware: 1) delete /etc/adjtime 2) run /etc/init.d/hwclock.sh 3) run adjtimexconfig 4) run ntpdate server 5) run /etc/init.d/ntp-server start Turns out my adjtime was way off due to a bad clock on the previous