hi,
recently, i found the gcc-3.4 branch a little more unstable than usual. the
last days brought some more problem reports. furthermore gcc-3.4 is updated
less frequently than the pure64 branch (afaik). therefore i decided to switch
back from gcc-3.4 to pure64 last week.
if you plan do
Knüpfer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hi,
>
> recently, i found the gcc-3.4 branch a little more unstable than usual. the
> last days brought some more problem reports. furthermore gcc-3.4 is updated
> less frequently than the pure64 branch (afaik). therefore i decided to
ded to switch
> back from gcc-3.4 to pure64 last week.
>
> if you plan do switch back, too, make /etc/apt/sources.list point to the any
> of the pure64 branch mirrors, do 'apt-get update' and run
> 'dpkg --get-selections | grep -w install | \
> xargs - -n 20 apt-g
> recently, i found the gcc-3.4 branch a little more unstable than usual.
I agree.
First i've install libc6 pure64.
> if you plan do switch back, too, make /etc/apt/sources.list point to the
> any of the pure64 branch mirrors, do 'apt-get update' and run
> 'dpkg --get-selections | grep -w install
I've find the good way :
dpkg --get-selections | grep -w install | awk '{print $1}' | xargs -n 10
-- apt-get -y --reinstall install
Thanks to Andreas Jochens
Ludovic Watteaux
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> hi,
>
> recently, i found the gcc-3.4 branch a little more unstable than usual. the
> last days brought some more problem reports. furthermore gcc-3.4 is updated
> less frequently than the pure64 branch (afaik). therefore i decided to switch
> back from gcc-3.4 to pure64 last we
On Tue, 2005-01-25 at 23:55 +, L W wrote:
> I've find the good way :
>
> dpkg --get-selections | grep -w install | awk '{print $1}' | xargs -n 10
> -- apt-get -y --reinstall install
>
I've followed the steps to move from gcc4 to pure64 and found out that
after the migration, some of the pac
my first guess is a missing 'apt-get update' before the reinstall attempt.
i checked some of the packages you mentioned and they are fine on my system.
sorry if this idea was too simple
best regards, knue
On Friday 28 January 2005 16:23, Andrei Mikhailovsky wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-01-25 at 23:55
Nope, did and update beforehand. If the update haven't been done, then
most likely that the other packages haven't been updated as well.
Any other ideas?
Do you know how can I force download and reinstallation of a package?
the mans for dpkg/apt-get show the --reinstall option, but it doesn't
wor
Hmmm, this happened to me as well, but only with a couple packages (like cpp).
I just installed them by hand. I'm not an expert, but does the installation
of the equivalent pure64 packages constitute a "downgrade" for these
packages, or are the versions identical?
Perhaps what is happening is
On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 15:23:30 +, Andrei Mikhailovsky
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've followed the steps to move from gcc4 to pure64 and found out that
> after the migration, some of the packages haven't been updated. Quite a
> lot actually, about 100 or so packages still had .gcc4 in their ve
11 matches
Mail list logo
