Re: sys_ioctl under amd64 (Was: AMD64 patch for flavio's fglrx debs)

2005-04-10 Thread Thomas Steffen
On Apr 10, 2005 7:47 PM, Cyril Chaboisseau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > do you think it's the "console switching" or the XFree86 drivers ? I had a discussion with Lutz Donnerhacke (iirc) about that a few years ago. He said (and I do agree), that the console switching in Linux is broken by design.

Re: sys_ioctl under amd64 (Was: AMD64 patch for flavio's fglrx debs)

2005-04-10 Thread Cyril Chaboisseau
On April 10th at 19:24, Thomas Steffen wrote: > On Apr 10, 2005 6:42 PM, Cyril Chaboisseau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > - I have 2 X sessions running at the same time (:0 and :1 respectively > > on vt7/vt8) and 3D acceleration is only enable on one of them > > You should consider yourself ver

Re: sys_ioctl under amd64 (Was: AMD64 patch for flavio's fglrx debs)

2005-04-10 Thread Thomas Steffen
On Apr 10, 2005 6:42 PM, Cyril Chaboisseau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > - I have 2 X sessions running at the same time (:0 and :1 respectively > on vt7/vt8) and 3D acceleration is only enable on one of them You should consider yourself very lucky. When I try to start another X server, everything

sys_ioctl under amd64 (Was: AMD64 patch for flavio's fglrx debs)

2005-04-10 Thread Cyril Chaboisseau
I'm answering to my own post because up until now, I had the error for which I found the solution which might help others... Jan. 20th at 23:17, Cyril Chaboisseau wrote: > the compilation of the packages went almost smoothly (I just had to > modify a couple usr/X11R6/lib to usr/X11R6/lib64) but