Re: Question about maintaining the unofficial/parallel apache-lingerd package.

2004-11-22 Thread dean gaudet
On Fri, 19 Nov 2004, Alexis Sukrieh wrote: I'm maintaining an unofficial package, apache-lingerd [1]. It's a new flavour of the official Debian apache source tree. it's been more than 4 years since i last had to remember all the details surrounding linger... but the main reason apache does

apache2-doc, apache2.conf, negotiation

2004-11-22 Thread Frank.A.Uepping
Hi, I have just installed the apache2 and apache2-doc. Unfortunately the default configuration (/etc/apache2/...) seems not to work well with respect to negotiation and the apache2-doc. Maybe you want a look on this. /FAU

Re: Question about maintaining the unofficial/parallel apache-lingerd package.

2004-11-22 Thread Tollef Fog Heen
* dean gaudet | On Sun, 21 Nov 2004, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote: | | As personal opinion I need to agree with Tollef, that apache1.3 is | basically a dead package and it might get removed from Debian | after Sarge is released. That means providing only security | support to it. | |

この機会にご利用ください

2004-11-22 Thread shamail
$BGR7M$N$3$H$H$*7D$S?=$7>e$2$^$9!#(B $B7HBS%i%s%-%s%0%5%$%H1?1D$7$F$*$j$^$9!Z(BRankingGallery$B![$H?=$7$^$9!#(B (B $BFMA3$N$*JX$j$G<:NiCW$7$^$9!#(B (B $B$*$+$2$5$^$G=gD4$K%"%/%;%9?t$,?-$S$F;2$j$^$7$?!#(B $BH<$$$^$7$F!"?75,%i%s%-%s%0%5%$%H$r9=C[$7$^$7$?!#(B (B

Re: Question about maintaining the unofficial/parallel apache-lingerd package.

2004-11-22 Thread Alexis Sukrieh
* Tollef Fog Heen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) disait : There's not really any point in doing much work on the apache 1 branch. Apache 1 is dead upstream (or, low activity security-fixes only-mode) and will be orphaned by the Debian maintainers once Sarge is out the door Yes, things are sounding like