Processing of apache2_2.2.3-5_i386.changes

2007-06-10 Thread Archive Administrator
apache2_2.2.3-5_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: apache2_2.2.3-5.dsc apache2_2.2.3-5.diff.gz apache2.2-common_2.2.3-5_i386.deb apache2-mpm-worker_2.2.3-5_i386.deb apache2-mpm-prefork_2.2.3-5_i386.deb apache2-mpm-event_2.2.3-5_i386.deb

Bug#396162: marked as done (/etc/init.d/apache2 still has wrong logic in PID detection)

2007-06-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 10 Jun 2007 17:47:04 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#396162: fixed in apache2 2.2.3-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#419552: marked as done (Documentation: README.Debian is needed)

2007-06-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 10 Jun 2007 17:47:04 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#419552: fixed in apache2 2.2.3-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#428058: marked as done (apache2.2-common: a2enmod's cgi/cgid cleverness does not work with apache2-mpm-itk)

2007-06-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 10 Jun 2007 17:47:04 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#428058: fixed in apache2 2.2.3-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#423436: marked as done (unsuitable file-permission/-ownership for DAV-lockfile)

2007-06-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 10 Jun 2007 17:47:04 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#420101: fixed in apache2 2.2.3-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#312385: marked as done (apache2-common: suexec fails to open log file after a cgi error)

2007-06-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 10 Jun 2007 17:47:04 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#312385: fixed in apache2 2.2.3-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#390348: marked as done (apache2-common: help message in init script)

2007-06-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 10 Jun 2007 17:47:04 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#390348: fixed in apache2 2.2.3-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#423653: marked as done (apache2.2-common: mod_disk_cache fills /var after etch upgrade)

2007-06-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 10 Jun 2007 17:47:04 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#423653: fixed in apache2 2.2.3-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#416322: marked as done (apache2 returns a .bz2 file as plaintext)

2007-06-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 10 Jun 2007 17:47:04 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#416322: fixed in apache2 2.2.3-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#412580: marked as done (Apache reporting incorrect header values for error 500 documents)

2007-06-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 10 Jun 2007 17:47:04 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#412580: fixed in apache2 2.2.3-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

apache2 override disparity

2007-06-10 Thread Debian Installer
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the override file for the following file(s): apache2-mpm-event_2.2.3-5_i386.deb: package says section is web, override says net. apache2-mpm-perchild_2.2.3-5_all.deb: package says section is web, override says net.

apache2_2.2.3-5_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2007-06-10 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: apache2-doc_2.2.3-5_all.deb to pool/main/a/apache2/apache2-doc_2.2.3-5_all.deb apache2-mpm-event_2.2.3-5_i386.deb to pool/main/a/apache2/apache2-mpm-event_2.2.3-5_i386.deb apache2-mpm-perchild_2.2.3-5_all.deb to pool/main/a/apache2/apache2-mpm-perchild_2.2.3-5_all.deb

Bug#400981: marked as done (apache2: MPM-s described as for Apache 2.1)

2007-06-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 10 Jun 2007 17:47:04 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#400981: fixed in apache2 2.2.3-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#403682: marked as done (apache2.2: FTBFS: /bin/sh: mawk: command not found)

2007-06-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 10 Jun 2007 17:47:04 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#403682: fixed in apache2 2.2.3-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#422589: marked as done (a2enmod not foolproof)

2007-06-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 10 Jun 2007 17:47:04 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#422589: fixed in apache2 2.2.3-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#401053: marked as done (apache2: force-reload doesn't take 'runlevels' into account)

2007-06-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 10 Jun 2007 17:47:04 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#401053: fixed in apache2 2.2.3-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#391813: marked as done (apache2.2-common: man page for apache2 missing in apache2.2-common)

2007-06-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 10 Jun 2007 17:47:04 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#391813: fixed in apache2 2.2.3-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#399043: marked as done (apache 2.2.3 building rules misses zlib development library)

2007-06-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 10 Jun 2007 17:47:04 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#399043: fixed in apache2 2.2.3-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#420101: marked as done (mod_dav fails to open the lock database because ownership of /var/lock/apache2 fails to set properly)

2007-06-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 10 Jun 2007 17:47:04 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#420101: fixed in apache2 2.2.3-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#322385: marked as done (Missing manpages)

2007-06-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 10 Jun 2007 17:47:04 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#322385: fixed in apache2 2.2.3-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#412407: marked as done (apache2.2-common: init script doesn't report error when being called with unknown parameter)

2007-06-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 10 Jun 2007 17:47:04 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#412407: fixed in apache2 2.2.3-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#341041: marked as done (apache2-common: no man page for a2ensite)

2007-06-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 10 Jun 2007 17:47:04 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#322385: fixed in apache2 2.2.3-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#341043: marked as done (apache2-common: no man page for a2dissite)

2007-06-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 10 Jun 2007 17:47:04 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#322385: fixed in apache2 2.2.3-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#397789: marked as done (apache2.2-common: /etc/apache2/ is still present after having purged the package)

2007-06-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 10 Jun 2007 17:47:04 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#397789: fixed in apache2 2.2.3-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#418605: marked as done (purging does not clean up /etc/apache2)

2007-06-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 10 Jun 2007 17:47:04 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#397789: fixed in apache2 2.2.3-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#412602: marked as done (apache2.2-common: a2enmod doesn't know about apache2-mpm-itk -- breaks mod_cgi by default)

2007-06-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 10 Jun 2007 17:47:04 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#412602: fixed in apache2 2.2.3-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#407307: marked as done (Apache2 - missing mod_includes causes unknown filter errors)

2007-06-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 10 Jun 2007 17:47:04 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#407307: fixed in apache2 2.2.3-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#413727: marked as done (apache2.2-common: mod_proxy_ftp segfaults (NULL deref.) when FTP server sends back no spaces)

2007-06-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 10 Jun 2007 17:47:04 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#413727: fixed in apache2 2.2.3-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#418464: marked as done (Missing file /etc/apache2/conf.d/apache2-doc)

2007-06-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 10 Jun 2007 17:47:04 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#418464: fixed in apache2 2.2.3-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#412580: Clarification for solution

2007-06-10 Thread Bob Kline
I can't tell for sure whether Stefan's comment (posted today) means the intent is that the patch posted by Tim on the 28th will be applied, or if the latest version of Apache will really be used. I want to assume the latter, based on the phrase the latest version of apache2 ... but I thought