Bug#1007254: apache2-dev: Missing dependency on libpcre2-dev for apxs2

2022-03-14 Thread Adrian Bunk
Package: apache2-dev Version: 2.4.53-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Control: affects -1 src:mod-vhost-ldap https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=mod-vhost-ldap&ver=2.4.0-1%2Bb3 ... make[1]: Entering directory '/<>' # Try building with per request document root and if it fails, do the nor

Bug#950300: mod-gnutls: apache CVE-2019-10092 fix causes FTBFS

2020-01-30 Thread Adrian Bunk
Source: mod-gnutls Version: 0.8.2-3 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs mod-gnutls appears to rely on the exact wording of apache error messages, and these changed with CVE-2019-10092. https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=mod-gnutls&suite=stretch https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/r

Bug#914297: apache2: getrandom call blocks on first startup, systemd kills with timeout

2018-12-14 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 11:35:37PM +0100, Stefan Fritsch wrote: >... > I don't see why it should take so > long for the random number generator to initialize. >... On embedded systems without hwrng "10 minutes" or "2 hours" are real-life observations for the time it takes. Note that this became

Bug#828236: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#844160: openssl 1.1 and apache2

2016-11-18 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 06:10:31AM +0100, Stefan Fritsch wrote: > On Friday, 18 November 2016 01:09:53 CET Adrian Bunk wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 11:18:57PM +0100, Stefan Fritsch wrote: > > > On Thursday, 17 November 2016 21:39:19 CET Kurt Roeckx wrote: > > >

Bug#828236: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#844160: openssl 1.1 and apache2

2016-11-17 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 11:18:57PM +0100, Stefan Fritsch wrote: > On Thursday, 17 November 2016 21:39:19 CET Kurt Roeckx wrote: > > > That header was created for mod_ssl_ct which provides support for > > > certificate transparency. It's quite new and likely that nothing else > > > uses the header.

Bug#844160: Bug#828236: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#844160: openssl 1.1 and apache2

2016-11-16 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 11:05:13PM +0100, Stefan Fritsch wrote: >... > BTW, I am pretty sure that support for enhanced master secret and chacha20 > will appear for openssl 1.0.2 before the release of stretch+1, if only > because > redhat needs it for its long support cycles. Back-porting that to

Bug#828236: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#844160: openssl 1.1 and apache2

2016-11-16 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 08:36:49PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 03:06:44PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: > > Stefan Fritsch writes: > > > > > I must admit that I did not think of php when doing that change, sorry. > > > > > On the other hand, shibboleth-sp2 also build-depend

Bug#828236: Bug#844160: marked as done (apache2-dev should depend on libssl1.0-dev)

2016-11-14 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 08:44:35AM +0100, Ondřej Surý wrote: > On Mon, Nov 14, 2016, at 08:21, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 05:03:45AM +0100, Ondřej Surý wrote: > > > > Looking at mod_ssl_openssl.h and the comment in #828330, > > > > I&#x

Bug#844160: marked as done (apache2-dev should depend on libssl1.0-dev)

2016-11-13 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 05:03:45AM +0100, Ondřej Surý wrote: > > Looking at mod_ssl_openssl.h and the comment in #828330, > > I'd suggest the change below to add a dependency on libssl1.0-dev > > to apache2-dev. > > And that exactly happens meaning that PHP 7.0 can no longer be built > unless all

Bug#844160: apache2-dev should depend on libssl1.0-dev

2016-11-12 Thread Adrian Bunk
Package: apache2-dev Version: 2.4.23-5 Severity: serious Looking at mod_ssl_openssl.h and the comment in #828330, I'd suggest the change below to add a dependency on libssl1.0-dev to apache2-dev. This would prevent packages from build-depending (directly or indirectly) on both apache2-dev and the

Bug#736809: apache2-bin needs proper Breaks: for Apache 2.4 transition

2014-07-30 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 03:55:04PM +0200, Arno Töll wrote: > On 26.01.2014 22:30, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > Second, for supporting all possible upgrade and partial upgrade > > scenarios (not only between wheezy and jessie, Debian-derived > > distributions like Ubu

Bug#736809: apache2-bin needs proper Breaks: for Apache 2.4 transition

2014-01-26 Thread Adrian Bunk
Package: apache2-bin Version: 2.4.6-3 Severity: serious First, I was surprised to see the many open and non-RC bugs in [1], shouldn't packages that e.g. use /etc/apache2/conf.d/ have an RC bug since they'll definitely have to get fixed for jessie? Second, for supporting all possible upgrade and p

Re: Bug#664997: Issues with your #664997 bug report

2012-03-25 Thread Adrian Bunk
[ Added debian-apache@lists.debian.org to the Cc, see the "should be discouraged in the Packaging Guidelines" below. Please Cc me on replies. ] On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 11:43:00PM +0200, Olaf van der Spek wrote: > On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 11:36 PM, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > t