Re: Bug#228421: gcc 3.0.4 generates bad code on Debian 3.0/PARISC

2004-01-25 Thread Matthew Wilcox
On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 11:03:53AM -0700, Grant Grundler wrote: > On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 06:05:17PM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote: > > But the root of the problem lies in gcc 3.0.4 since it is OK in 3.3.2. So > > wouldn't it be easier to identify and backport the fix from 3.3.2 to 3.0.4 > > and infor

Re: Bug#228421: gcc 3.0.4 generates bad code on Debian 3.0/PARISC

2004-01-25 Thread Grant Grundler
On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 06:05:17PM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote: > But the root of the problem lies in gcc 3.0.4 since it is OK in 3.3.2. So > wouldn't it be easier to identify and backport the fix from 3.3.2 to 3.0.4 > and inform all projects that they must recompile everything on parisc ? "recompi

Re: Bug#228421: gcc 3.0.4 generates bad code on Debian 3.0/PARISC

2004-01-25 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 05:36:10PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > tags 228421 + woody > tags 228421 + fixed-upstream > thanks > > Well, maybe a recompilation and binary NMU for apache would suffice? recompiling apache with -O1 is enough, that's what I did here and it works. > Should the report b

Re: Bug#228421: gcc 3.0.4 generates bad code on Debian 3.0/PARISC

2004-01-25 Thread Matthias Klose
tags 228421 + woody tags 228421 + fixed-upstream thanks Well, maybe a recompilation and binary NMU for apache would suffice? Should the report be reassignd to apache? Willy Tarreau writes: > Package: gcc > Version: 2:3.0.4-5 > > Kernel: Linux hp 2.4.24-pa0 #1 Sun Jan 11 18:48:21 CET 2004 parisc