Bug#341022: Update Please

2006-01-21 Thread Olaf van der Spek
| Why doesn't any one give any update information on this bug ? Because it hasn't been discussed? Why has it not been discussed? | I even don't know if it's accepted/rejected. I think it should be rejected, since it's just a way for you to (mis)configure your server. Don't do that,

Bug#341022: Update Please

2006-01-02 Thread Tollef Fog Heen
* Ritesh Raj Sarraf | Why doesn't any one give any update information on this bug ? Because it hasn't been discussed? | I even don't know if it's accepted/rejected. I think it should be rejected, since it's just a way for you to (mis)configure your server. Don't do that, then. -- Tollef

Bug#341022: Update Please

2006-01-02 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
* Ritesh Raj Sarraf | I even don't know if it's accepted/rejected. I think it should be rejected, since it's just a way for you to (mis)configure your server. Don't do that, then. Agreed. But shouldn't the default configuration be secure enough ? Regards, rs -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

Bug#341022: Update Please

2006-01-02 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
* Ritesh Raj Sarraf | I even don't know if it's accepted/rejected. I think it should be rejected, since it's just a way for you to (mis)configure your server. Don't do that, then. Agreed. But shouldn't the default configuration be secure enough ? Regards, rs -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

Bug#341022: Update Please

2006-01-01 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
Why doesn't any one give any update information on this bug ? I even don't know if it's accepted/rejected. rs -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf RESEARCHUT -- http://www.researchut.com Stealing logic from one person is plagiarism, stealing from many is research. Necessity is the mother of invention.