Re: Patch to integrate Metux MPM into the Debian unstable Apache2 tree

2005-02-28 Thread Nick Maynard
On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 04:56:43PM +, Thom May wrote: I'm strongly opposed to doing this. I see no sign that the metux authors have any desire to integrate metux with upstream, and I absolutely think that the apache2 package should not contain any major components that aren't included in

Re: Patch to integrate Metux MPM into the Debian unstable Apache2 tree

2005-02-28 Thread Nick Maynard
On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 04:07:16PM +, Thom May wrote: They should send useful patches to the dev list (both apr and httpd), make their build system and everything that they do absolutely compatible with the upstream way of doing it (last I looked, metux required automake to build, which

Re: Patch to integrate Metux MPM into the Debian unstable Apache2 tree

2005-02-28 Thread Nick Maynard
On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 04:07:16PM +, Thom May wrote: They should send useful patches to the dev list (both apr and httpd), make their build system and everything that they do absolutely compatible with the upstream way of doing it (last I looked, metux required automake to build, which

Re: Patch to integrate Metux MPM into the Debian unstable Apache2 tree

2005-02-25 Thread Thom May
* Nick Maynard ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : What are your thoughts on integrating this functionality into the main unstable/experimental tree? Thank you, I'm strongly opposed to doing this. I see no sign that the metux authors have any desire to integrate metux with upstream, and I