Re: apxs and LIBEXECDIR ?

2004-02-19 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
Hi David, sorry for the late reply but i didn't notice this mail until now. On Tue, 3 Feb 2004, David N. Welton wrote: Another thought that crossed my mind. apxs -q LIBEXECDIR is where automated installers might want to put modules, right? Yes. At least if they are using apxs

Re: apxs and LIBEXECDIR ?

2004-02-19 Thread David N. Welton
Fabio Massimo Di Nitto [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hi David, sorry for the late reply but i didn't notice this mail until now. No problem. Another thought that crossed my mind. apxs -q LIBEXECDIR is where automated installers might want to put modules, right? Yes. At least

Re: apxs and LIBEXECDIR ?

2004-02-19 Thread David N. Welton
Fabio Massimo Di Nitto [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: As I said the bug is pending. A fix has been already introduced to avoid apache to stop upgrading. Another fix instead is on the way to generate .info files from apxs (#228077) but it is still under testing and it will not make it for this

apxs and LIBEXECDIR ?

2004-02-03 Thread David N. Welton
Another thought that crossed my mind. apxs -q LIBEXECDIR is where automated installers might want to put modules, right? At least if they are using apxs as a guide. Another reason why just dying because of modules in that directory is a bad idea, IMO... -- David N. Welton Consulting: http