Re: apache upgrade cleans modules.conf
On Wed, 8 Sep 2004, Gabor FUNK wrote: Current testing, upg. to apache 1.3.31-5 rendered php4 not working by installing a clear modules.conf over the one which contained a modules.conf with a line: loadmodule php4_module ... Happened on two systems. G. php4 has been broken for a few days. I saw a recent upload of it that should fix this issue. Fabio -- user fajita: step one fajita Whatever the problem, step one is always to look in the error log. user fajita: step two fajita When in danger or in doubt, step two is to scream and shout.
Re: Bug#269757: apache-common: missing .info for mod_macro.so error during libapache-mod-php4 setup
On Sat, 4 Sep 2004, Jonathan Ah Kit wrote: Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote: Setting up libapache-mod-php4 (4.3.8-9) ... Error: mod_macro.so does not have a corresponding .info file. apache-common does not ship mod_macro.so or the info file. mod_macro is compiled in. Please check /usr/lib/apache/1.3/ for any mod_macro.so and move them somewhere. In any case that is a warning and not an error. It has been converted as such, a long time ago. Hi Fabio, I suspected this was a built-in module, whatever the jargon is. This workaround you've mentioned seems to have solved it; I checked after a restart and the module still seems to be listed in apache's list. Time to see now if anything breaks. :) This is not really a workaround. In terms that mod_macro.so should have never been there in the first place. I get the same error message when installing the latest apache 1.3.31-4 sarge package, *however* an error isn't reported by apache's setup. But as per above libapache-mod-php4 does, so setup doesn't complete. This is perhaps another bug related to php4 and i can't see why apache is at fault. In anycase the php4 maintainer reads the list. Perhaps. I guess now it's a case of trying to figure out who/what the heck installed the file in the first place? That raises a whole bunch of possibilities to me (though apache would be the prime -- though not the only -- suspect for me at this stage). Did you ever compiled apache by yourself? Debian doesn't ship that module since at least 4 years. Fabio PS I am closing the bug in the meanwhile and we can keep the discussion on the mailing list. apache did what it was supposed to do. -- user fajita: step one fajita Whatever the problem, step one is always to look in the error log. user fajita: step two fajita When in danger or in doubt, step two is to scream and shout.
Processed: your mail
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 269499 upstream Bug#269499: apache-ssl: SSL log directives don't work? There were no tags set. Tags added: upstream stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Bug#267430: marked as done (apache-ssl: SSLCACertificatePath directive cannot deal with dead symlinks)
Your message dated Thu, 09 Sep 2004 02:17:18 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#267430: fixed in apache 1.3.31-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Aug 2004 15:27:35 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Aug 22 08:27:35 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.lanhost.de [80.190.245.149] (postfix) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1ByuFr-0003A2-00; Sun, 22 Aug 2004 08:27:35 -0700 Received: from taz.gymszbad.de (unknown [134.76.248.101]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.lanhost.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2EF9C0014 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 22 Aug 2004 17:27:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: by taz.gymszbad.de (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 036547A2A; Sun, 22 Aug 2004 17:27:28 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Mario Lipinski [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: apache-ssl fails to start with erronous symlink in directory specified as SSLCACertificatePath X-Mailer: reportbug 2.63 Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2004 17:27:28 +0200 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: apache-ssl Version: 1.3.31-3 Severity: normal apache-ssl fails to start with erronous symlink in directory specified as SSLCACertificatePath. an error gets logged in some wired location. the only place where the error log was specified was in a vhost config. i guess it was that one with the oldest date. [Sun Aug 22 17:11:06 2004] [crit] error reading CA certs [Sun Aug 22 17:11:06 2004] [crit] error:0906D06C:PEM routines:PEM_read_bio:no start line [Sun Aug 22 17:11:06 2004] [crit] error:0906D06C:PEM routines:PEM_read_bio:no start line [Sun Aug 22 17:11:06 2004] [crit] error:02001002:system library:fopen:No such file or directory [Sun Aug 22 17:11:06 2004] [crit] error:20074002:BIO routines:FILE_CTRL:system lib I found this one by stracing the apache-ssl process (altough i am not experienced with debugging processes). There was although the error message, that the particular file (from the broken symlink) could not be opened. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.6-taz.gymszbad.de Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C Versions of packages apache-ssl depends on: ii apache-common 1.3.31-3 Support files for all Apache webse ii debconf 1.4.30 Debian configuration management sy ii dpkg1.10.23 Package maintenance system for Deb ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-13 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libdb4.24.2.52-16Berkeley v4.2 Database Libraries [ ii libexpat1 1.95.6-8 XML parsing C library - runtime li ii libkeynote0 2.3-10 Decentralized Trust-Management sys ii libmagic1 4.09-1 File type determination library us ii libpam0g0.76-22 Pluggable Authentication Modules l ii libssl0.9.7 0.9.7d-4 SSL shared libraries ii logrotate 3.7-2Log rotation utility ii mime-support3.28-1 MIME files 'mime.types' 'mailcap ii openssl 0.9.7d-4 Secure Socket Layer (SSL) binary a ii perl5.8.4-2 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction ii ssl-cert1.0-8Simple debconf wrapper for openssl -- debconf information: * apache-ssl/server-admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * apache-ssl/enable-suexec: false * apache-ssl/init: true * apache-ssl/server-name: taz.gymszbad.de * apache-ssl/document-root: /var/www --- Received: (at 267430-close) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Sep 2004 06:23:30 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 08 23:23:30 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id
apache override disparity
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the override file for the following file(s): apache-perl_1.3.31-6_i386.deb: package says priority is optional, override says extra. Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think the override is correct and the package wrong please fix the package so that this disparity is fixed in the next upload. If you feel the override is incorrect then please reply to this mail and explain why. [NB: this is an automatically generated mail; if you replied to one like it before and have not received a response yet, please ignore this mail. Your reply needs to be processed by a human and will be in due course, but until then the installer will send these automated mails; sorry.] -- Debian distribution maintenance software (This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Bug#269009: marked as done (use lynx in apachectl but does not depend on it)
Your message dated Thu, 09 Sep 2004 02:17:18 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#269009: fixed in apache 1.3.31-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Aug 2004 10:18:12 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 30 03:18:12 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1C1jEq-0004l1-00; Mon, 30 Aug 2004 03:18:12 -0700 Received: from port-212-202-70-180.dynamic.qsc.de ([212.202.70.180] helo=treasure.calvinsplayground.de) by mx01.qsc.de with smtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1C1jEK-0006h4-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 30 Aug 2004 12:17:40 +0200 Received: (qmail 9431 invoked by uid 1000); 30 Aug 2004 10:17:37 - Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Bastian Kleineidam [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: use lynx in apachectl but does not depend on it X-Mailer: reportbug 2.64 Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 12:17:37 +0200 X-BadReturnPath: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewritten as [EMAIL PROTECTED] using From header Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: apache Version: 1.3.31-4 Severity: normal Hi, the /usr/sbin/apachectl program uses lynx to display the server status, but apache does not depend (or recommend) on lynx. I suggest adding lynx to the dependencies. Regards, Bastian -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-treasure1 Locale: LANG=C, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Versions of packages apache depends on: ii apache-common 1.3.31-4 Support files for all Apache webse ii debconf 1.4.32 Debian configuration management sy ii dpkg1.10.23 Package maintenance system for Deb ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-16 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libdb4.24.2.52-17Berkeley v4.2 Database Libraries [ ii libexpat1 1.95.6-8 XML parsing C library - runtime li ii libmagic1 4.10-3 File type determination library us ii logrotate 3.7-2Log rotation utility ii mime-support3.28-1 MIME files 'mime.types' 'mailcap ii perl5.8.4-2 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction -- debconf information: * apache/enable-suexec: false apache/server-name: treasure.calvinsplayground.de apache/document-root: /var/www apache/server-port: 80 apache/init: true apache/server-admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Received: (at 269009-close) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Sep 2004 06:23:36 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 08 23:23:36 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1C5ILI-0004gz-00; Wed, 08 Sep 2004 23:23:36 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1C5IFC-0005Kt-00; Thu, 09 Sep 2004 02:17:18 -0400 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Fabio M. Di Nitto) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.51 $ Subject: Bug#269009: fixed in apache 1.3.31-6 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2004 02:17:18 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 Source: apache Source-Version: 1.3.31-6 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of apache, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: apache-common_1.3.31-6_i386.deb to pool/main/a/apache/apache-common_1.3.31-6_i386.deb apache-dbg_1.3.31-6_i386.deb to pool/main/a/apache/apache-dbg_1.3.31-6_i386.deb apache-dev_1.3.31-6_all.deb to
Bug#270224: marked as done (LogFormat directive probably incorrect)
Your message dated Thu, 09 Sep 2004 02:17:18 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#270224: fixed in apache 1.3.31-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Sep 2004 08:56:04 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 06 01:56:04 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from not-assigned (scys9.scy001.de) [213.217.99.197]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1C4FIC-0005ij-00; Mon, 06 Sep 2004 01:56:04 -0700
Received: from mail pickup service by scys9.scy001.de with Microsoft
SMTPSVC;
Mon, 6 Sep 2004 10:59:26 +0200
Received: from scys5.scy001.de ([10.1.100.1]) by scys9.scy001.de with
Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5329);
Mon, 6 Sep 2004 10:59:26 +0200
Received: from vash.zugschlus.de ([10.1.2.92]) by scys5.scy001.de with
Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713);
Mon, 6 Sep 2004 10:59:36 +0200
Received: from mh by vash.zugschlus.de with local (Exim 4.34)
id 1C4FIA-0002RQ-3t; Mon, 06 Sep 2004 10:56:02 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Marc Haber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: LogFormat directive probably incorrect
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.64
Date: Mon, 06 Sep 2004 10:56:02 +0200
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Marc Haber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Sep 2004 08:59:36.0694 (UTC)
FILETIME=[D5D13160:01C493EF]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: apache
Version: 1.3.29.0.2-5
Severity: minor
LogFormat %h %l %u %t \%r\ %s %b \%{forensic-id}n forensic
This looks like we're missing a \ between the %{forensic-id}n and the
quote.
Greetings
Marc
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8.1-vash
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=de_DE
Versions of packages apache depends on:
pn apache-commonNot found.
ii debconf 1.4.34 Debian configuration management sy
ii dpkg1.10.23 Package maintenance system for Deb
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-16 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libdb4.24.2.52-17Berkeley v4.2 Database Libraries [
ii libexpat1 1.95.6-8 XML parsing C library - runtime li
ii libmagic1 4.10-3 File type determination library us
ii libpam0g0.76-22 Pluggable Authentication Modules l
ii logrotate 3.7-2Log rotation utility
ii mime-support3.28-1 MIME files 'mime.types' 'mailcap
ii perl5.8.4-2 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction
---
Received: (at 270224-close) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Sep 2004 06:23:37 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 08 23:23:37 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1C5ILJ-0004hC-00; Wed, 08 Sep 2004 23:23:37 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1C5IFC-0005Kx-00; Thu, 09 Sep 2004 02:17:18 -0400
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Fabio M. Di Nitto)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.51 $
Subject: Bug#270224: fixed in apache 1.3.31-6
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2004 02:17:18 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 4
Source: apache
Source-Version: 1.3.31-6
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
apache, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
apache-common_1.3.31-6_i386.deb
to pool/main/a/apache/apache-common_1.3.31-6_i386.deb
apache-dbg_1.3.31-6_i386.deb
to
Bug#270768: apache2-prefork-dev: /usr/bin/apxs2 -q LIBTOOL gives path to non-existent libtool file
Package: apache2-prefork-dev
Version: 2.0.50-12
Severity: important
Tags: experimental
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.26-1-386
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
Versions of packages apache2-prefork-dev depends on:
ii apache2-common 2.0.50-12 Next generation, scalable, extenda
ii autoconf 2.59-7 automatic configure script builder
ii autotools-dev20040822.1 Update infrastructure for config.{
ii bzip21.0.2-1 A high-quality block-sorting file
ii libapr0-dev 2.0.50-12 Development headers for libapr
ii libdb4.2-dev 4.2.52-17 Berkeley v4.2 Database Libraries [
ii libpcre3-dev 4.5-1.1 Perl 5 Compatible Regular Expressi
ii libssl-dev 0.9.7d-4SSL development libraries, header
ii libtool 1.5.6-2 Generic library support script
ii openssl 0.9.7d-4Secure Socket Layer (SSL) binary a
ii zlib1g-dev 1:1.2.1.1-5 compression library - development
-- no debconf information
Bug#270635: marked as done (apache: building process should respect CFLAGS and LDFLAGS)
Your message dated Thu, 09 Sep 2004 02:17:18 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#270635: fixed in apache 1.3.31-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Sep 2004 12:25:00 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 08 05:25:00 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from emcom.pl (mask.emcom.pl) [217.117.130.213] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1C51VS-0001e2-00; Wed, 08 Sep 2004 05:24:58 -0700 Received: from beagle (l238.emcom.pl [192.168.0.238] (may be forged)) by mask.emcom.pl (8.9.3p2/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) with ESMTP id OAA05839; Wed, 8 Sep 2004 14:26:32 +0200 X-Authentication-Warning: mask.emcom.pl: Host l238.emcom.pl [192.168.0.238] (may be forged) claimed to be beagle Received: from jacek by beagle with local (Exim 4.34) id 1C51TS-SV-Ny; Wed, 08 Sep 2004 14:22:54 +0200 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary0447131716== MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Jacek Drobiecki [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: apache: building process should respect CFLAGS and LDFLAGS X-Mailer: reportbug 2.63 Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2004 14:22:54 +0200 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Jacek Drobiecki [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-BadReturnPath: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewritten as [EMAIL PROTECTED] using From header Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, UPPERCASE_25_50 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: This is a multi-part MIME message sent by reportbug. --===0447131716== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Package: apache Version: 1.3.31-5 Severity: minor Tags: patch there is no simple way to build packeage with additional options for compilation and linking. Buildiing process should respect enviroment variables CFLAGS and LDFLAGS to allow optimization or security improvments by seting up compilator switches. For egsample smb may want to use -march/-mcpu to optimize for specific platform, or -Wl,-pie to make position independent executables. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) --===0447131716== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=apache.rules.patch --- rules.orig 2004-09-08 14:03:36.0 +0200 +++ rules 2004-09-08 14:05:56.0 +0200 @@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ $(STAMP_DIR)/configure-stamp-apache: $(STAMP_DIR)/source.make @echo -e \n\n*** Configuring apache ***\n\n - cd $(V) CFLAGS=$(CONFLAGS) ./configure $(APACHEARGS) + cd $(V) LDFLAGS=$(LDFLAGS) CFLAGS=$(CFLAGS) $(CONFLAGS) ./configure $(APACHEARGS) @echo -e \n\n*** Creating apaci (apache) *** \n\n @@ -169,7 +169,7 @@ $(STAMP_DIR)/configure-stamp-ssl: $(STAMP_DIR)/source.make @echo -e \n\n*** Configuring apache-ssl ***\n\n - cd $(S) CFLAGS=$(CONFLAGS) ./configure $(SSLARGS) + cd $(S) LDFLAGS=$(LDFLAGS) CFLAGS=$(CFLAGS) $(CONFLAGS) ./configure $(SSLARGS) @echo -e \n\n*** Creating apaci (apache-ssl) *** \n\n @@ -218,7 +218,7 @@ PERL_TRACE=0 PERL_LOG_API=1 PERL_URI_API=1 PERL_UTIL_API=1 \ PERL_TABLE_API=1 PERL_FILE_API=1 - cd $(P) CFLAGS=$(CONFLAGS) ./configure $(PERLARGS) + cd $(P) LDFLAGS=$(LDFLAGS) CFLAGS=$(CFLAGS) $(CONFLAGS) ./configure $(PERLARGS) @echo -e \n\n*** Creating apaci (apache-perl) *** \n\n --===0447131716==-- --- Received: (at 270635-close) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Sep 2004 06:23:29 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 08 23:23:29 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1C5ILA-0004g6-00; Wed, 08 Sep 2004 23:23:28 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1C5IFC-0005Kz-00; Thu, 09 Sep 2004 02:17:18 -0400 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Fabio M. Di Nitto) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.51 $ Subject:
apache_1.3.31-6_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: apache-common_1.3.31-6_i386.deb to pool/main/a/apache/apache-common_1.3.31-6_i386.deb apache-dbg_1.3.31-6_i386.deb to pool/main/a/apache/apache-dbg_1.3.31-6_i386.deb apache-dev_1.3.31-6_all.deb to pool/main/a/apache/apache-dev_1.3.31-6_all.deb apache-doc_1.3.31-6_all.deb to pool/main/a/apache/apache-doc_1.3.31-6_all.deb apache-perl_1.3.31-6_i386.deb to pool/main/a/apache/apache-perl_1.3.31-6_i386.deb apache-ssl_1.3.31-6_i386.deb to pool/main/a/apache/apache-ssl_1.3.31-6_i386.deb apache-utils_1.3.31-6_i386.deb to pool/main/a/apache/apache-utils_1.3.31-6_i386.deb apache_1.3.31-6.diff.gz to pool/main/a/apache/apache_1.3.31-6.diff.gz apache_1.3.31-6.dsc to pool/main/a/apache/apache_1.3.31-6.dsc apache_1.3.31-6_i386.deb to pool/main/a/apache/apache_1.3.31-6_i386.deb libapache-mod-perl_1.29.0.2-13_i386.deb to pool/main/a/apache/libapache-mod-perl_1.29.0.2-13_i386.deb Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 267430 269009 270214 270224 270635 Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
Bug#270214: marked as done (httpd.conf issues with mod_backtrace and mod_whatkilledus)
Your message dated Thu, 09 Sep 2004 02:17:18 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#270214: fixed in apache 1.3.31-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Sep 2004 08:17:05 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 06 01:17:04 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from not-assigned (scys9.scy001.de) [213.217.99.197] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1C4EgS-0003IU-00; Mon, 06 Sep 2004 01:17:04 -0700 Received: from mail pickup service by scys9.scy001.de with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Mon, 6 Sep 2004 10:20:25 +0200 Received: from scys5.scy001.de ([10.1.100.1]) by scys9.scy001.de with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5329); Mon, 6 Sep 2004 10:20:25 +0200 Received: from vash.zugschlus.de ([10.1.2.92]) by scys5.scy001.de with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Mon, 6 Sep 2004 10:20:35 +0200 Received: from mh by vash.zugschlus.de with local (Exim 4.34) id 1C4EgO-0002Ob-QU; Mon, 06 Sep 2004 10:17:00 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Marc Haber [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: httpd.conf issues with mod_backtrace and mod_whatkilledus X-Mailer: reportbug 2.64 Date: Mon, 06 Sep 2004 10:17:00 +0200 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Marc Haber [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Sep 2004 08:20:35.0648 (UTC) FILETIME=[6271EC00:01C493EA] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: apache Severity: minor Hi, the httpd.conf in later apache packages configures mod_backtrace.c and mod_whatkilledus.c. The comment introducing that part of configuration contains an English error: +# They must NOT used in production environment if not for debugging! I am not a native speaker, but that looks like a be is missing here. Additionally, the following lines are not commented. Either even the IfModule and EnableExceptionHook lines should be commented as well, or the comments should state that the uncommented lines won't do any harm. Greetings Marc -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8.1-vash Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=de_DE Versions of packages apache depends on: pn apache-commonNot found. ii debconf 1.4.34 Debian configuration management sy ii dpkg1.10.23 Package maintenance system for Deb ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-16 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libdb4.24.2.52-17Berkeley v4.2 Database Libraries [ ii libexpat1 1.95.6-8 XML parsing C library - runtime li ii libmagic1 4.10-3 File type determination library us ii libpam0g0.76-22 Pluggable Authentication Modules l ii logrotate 3.7-2Log rotation utility ii mime-support3.28-1 MIME files 'mime.types' 'mailcap ii perl5.8.4-2 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction --- Received: (at 270214-close) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Sep 2004 06:23:29 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 08 23:23:29 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1C5ILB-0004gX-00; Wed, 08 Sep 2004 23:23:29 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1C5IFC-0005Kv-00; Thu, 09 Sep 2004 02:17:18 -0400 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Fabio M. Di Nitto) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.51 $ Subject: Bug#270214: fixed in apache 1.3.31-6 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2004 02:17:18 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no
