Bug#368225: please don't!

2006-06-19 Thread Toni Mueller

Hello,


I'd say that making a LAMP package that includes a lot of PHP stuff
and not much else is sort of hijacking a good name for a bad purpose.

If anything, packages like

 lamp-python (best language)
 lamp-perl   (original definition of LAMP)
 lamp-php

(in order of decreasing preference) should be created, but I'd also
argue that replacing MySQL with PostgreSQL is a Good Thing (TM) in many
cases.

In any case, I think that also probably libapache-mod-chroot should be
included and configured in any standard Apache install, and that the
BTS probably isn't the best place to discuss such policy questions...


Best,
--Toni++



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#368225: please don't!

2006-06-19 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
Toni Mueller wrote:
 Hello,
 
 
 I'd say that making a LAMP package that includes a lot of PHP stuff
 and not much else is sort of hijacking a good name for a bad purpose.
 
 If anything, packages like
 
  lamp-python (best language)
  lamp-perl   (original definition of LAMP)
  lamp-php
 
 (in order of decreasing preference) should be created, but I'd also
 argue that replacing MySQL with PostgreSQL is a Good Thing (TM) in many
 cases.
 
 In any case, I think that also probably libapache-mod-chroot should be
 included and configured in any standard Apache install, and that the
 BTS probably isn't the best place to discuss such policy questions...

What about creating a source called lamp that will create all these little tiny
lamp-* packages (arch: all) that can be updated as you like indipendently from
apache and leave apache on its own?

Fabio

-- 
I'm going to make him an offer he can't refuse.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#368225: please don't!

2006-06-19 Thread Thom May
I don't see there's any benefit in doing this _at all_, to be honest. It'll
just turn into a whine fest when people don't get exactly what they want
installed, and it then just becomes an unmaintainable mess.
-Thom


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



No More Classes MdknqR

2006-06-19 Thread Rosendo Negron



Good News!

Interested to obtain Bachelors', Masters', MBA's, Doctorate  Ph.D. degree=
s
available in your field in 2 weeks time?

It's available now...

Call Us and get yours today
1-484-693-8861

Our Education office has someone available 24 hours a day, 7 Days a week

Why waiting?
1-484-693-8861


Ju0U


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#368225: please don't!

2006-06-19 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
Thom May wrote:
 I don't see there's any benefit in doing this _at all_, to be honest. It'll
 just turn into a whine fest when people don't get exactly what they want
 installed, and it then just becomes an unmaintainable mess.
 -Thom

That's exactly why i don't want it in apache, and somebody can do it externally
and take the blame ;)

Fabio

-- 
I'm going to make him an offer he can't refuse.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#157734: is waht crihs siad ture?

2006-06-19 Thread Violet Hernandez
 today i need to goto the store. .

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

im wanting to show you this

I need a degre_ee in: 
,Accounting
,Business
,Criminal, justice
,Educ,ation
,Health
,Technology

There are no requ,ired tests, classes, books, or interviews!

Call, this number: 1,2,0,6-984-4433 (24 hours)

 Bye
 
 Keven Curry
 
Ashley disliked reading between the two buildings..
I get from most parents is ?Can you teach my child to talk?? This question has 
haunted me for years..
Joseph doesn't dislike praying carelessly..
9.
That librarian isn't enjoying jumping at the company..
Until that day, he could not hear the language differences. He asked for the 
computer every day by pointing to it. He was allowed to spend time each day on 
the noun program. One year later he was talking in full sentences and was 
staffed into normal preschool..
That dentist is not enjoying writing near my home..


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#368225: please don't!

2006-06-19 Thread Toni Mueller

Hello Fabio,

On Mon, 19.06.2006 at 11:19:22 +0200, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] wrote:
 Toni Mueller wrote:
  I'd say that making a LAMP package that includes a lot of PHP stuff
  and not much else is sort of hijacking a good name for a bad purpose.
  
   lamp-python (best language)
   lamp-perl   (original definition of LAMP)
   lamp-php
  
  In any case, I think that also probably libapache-mod-chroot should be
  included and configured in any standard Apache install, and that the
  BTS probably isn't the best place to discuss such policy questions...
 
 What about creating a source called lamp that will create all these little 
 tiny
 lamp-* packages (arch: all) that can be updated as you like indipendently from
 apache and leave apache on its own?

in case I wasn't clear, I'd like to repeat that I don't really see
added value in creating those lamp-* packages at all, and consider
these to be very similar to a task package, if anything. The reason is
that you don't need to do much in order to pull in most required
pieces, and some of the proposed choices are imho quite arbitrary.
IOW, they'd imho be much more trouble to maintain, than to a user's
benefit. It's also of very debatable merit to ease setting up a
(likely) broken web server because it would just mean that Joe Sixpack
needs to issue only one instead of five to ten commands to get all
stuff included which would mostly *only* benefit Joe Sixpack and not
someone who has half a clue already.

If you feel you need to create (one or more) lamp* packages
nonetheless, it would be imho a very bad idea to hijack the name and
hardwire it to some PHP (and other inferior) stuff, instead of creating
sort of a namespace for all flavours of LAMP that are commonly
encountered.

But this really belongs on -devel and not into the BTS anyway, Cc'ing.


Best,
--Toni++



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#368225: marked as done (Wish: Add LAMP metapackage)

2006-06-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 19 Jun 2006 22:41:47 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#368225: Wish: Add LAMP metapackage
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

---BeginMessage---
Package: apache
Severity: wishlist

Would it be possible to add a metapackage so that it is easier for a user/web 
developer to install a stadar LAMP
setup? I'm talking about something similar to apachefriends.org's XAMPP.

Packages included there:
 Apache 2.2.0, MySQL 5.0.20, PHP 5.1.2  4.4.2  PEAR + SQLite 2.8.17/3.2.8 + 
multibyte (mbstring) support, Perl
 5.8.7, ProFTPD 1.2.10, phpMyAdmin 2.8.0.3, OpenSSL 0.9.8a, GD 2.0.1, Freetype2 
2.1.7, libjpeg 6b, libpng 1.2.7,
 gdbm 1.8.0, zlib 1.2.3, expat 1.2, Sablotron 1.0, libxml 2.4.26, Ming 0.2a, 
Webalizer 2.01, pdf class 009e,
 ncurses 5.8, mod_perl 2.0.1, FreeTDS 0.63, gettext 0.11.5, IMAP C-Client 
2004e, OpenLDAP (client) 2.3.11,
 mcrypt 2.5.7, mhash 0.8.18, eAccelerator 0.9.4, cURL 7.13.1, libxslt 1.1.8, 
phpSQLiteAdmin 0.2, libapreq 2.06-dev,
 FPDF 1.53, XAMPP Control Panel 0.6

More Info: http://www.apachefriends.org/en/xampp-linux.html

---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
* Leonidas Arvanitis 

| Would it be possible to add a metapackage so that it is easier for a
| user/web developer to install a stadar LAMP setup? I'm talking about
| something similar to apachefriends.org's XAMPP.

Short answer: no.

Long answer:  This is not something the apache team wants to do.  If
somebody wants to make a package which sets up a LAMP (whether the P
is for perl, python, php or some other language), they're obviously
free to do so.  If so, an RFP (request for packaging) is probably what
you want, not a wishlist bug report against apache.

-- 
Tollef Fog Heen,''`.
UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are  : :' :
  `. `' 
`-  
---End Message---