Re: wwwconfig starter guide for the distracted lazy?

* Martin Langhoff ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : I intend to update the TWIG package to use wwwconfig, but I am at a loss as to where to start reading about best practices wrt wwwconfig. In my experience and opinion: wwwconfig is not the correct approach to use to update apache or apache2

Processing of ssl-cert_1.0-11_i386.changes

ssl-cert_1.0-11_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: ssl-cert_1.0-11.dsc ssl-cert_1.0-11.tar.gz ssl-cert_1.0-11_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon

Bug#267188: marked as done (ssl-cert: [INTL:pt_BR] Please apply attached patch to update Brazilian Portuguese translation)

Your message dated Fri, 07 Jan 2005 11:34:13 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#267188: fixed in ssl-cert 1.0-11 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#253810: marked as done (ssl-cert: confusing typo in english debconf template)

Your message dated Fri, 07 Jan 2005 11:34:13 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#253810: fixed in ssl-cert 1.0-11 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#287307: marked as done ([l10n] Initial Czech translation of ssl-cert debconf messages)

Your message dated Fri, 07 Jan 2005 11:34:13 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#287307: fixed in ssl-cert 1.0-11 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#264655: marked as done (ssl-cert: Please add German translation of the debconf templates)

Your message dated Fri, 07 Jan 2005 11:34:13 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#264655: fixed in ssl-cert 1.0-11 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

ssl-cert_1.0-11_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: ssl-cert_1.0-11.dsc to pool/main/s/ssl-cert/ssl-cert_1.0-11.dsc ssl-cert_1.0-11.tar.gz to pool/main/s/ssl-cert/ssl-cert_1.0-11.tar.gz ssl-cert_1.0-11_all.deb to pool/main/s/ssl-cert/ssl-cert_1.0-11_all.deb Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 253810

Bug#288050: marked as done (needs to binary depend on openssl)

Your message dated Fri, 07 Jan 2005 11:34:13 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#288050: fixed in ssl-cert 1.0-11 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now