Bug#326822: my local mirror has had this problem

My local partial debian mirror has had this problem many times, and restarting apache fixes it for a while. -- Blars Blarson [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.blars.org/blars.html With Microsoft, failure is not an option. It is a standard feature.

Bug#327796: marked as done (apache: [m68k] FTBFS: Segmentation fault ./gen_test_char test_char.h)

Your message dated Sun, 23 Oct 2005 06:27:55 +1000 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Closing bug has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to

H0t 0il CCpommpaa4noyOonTh0e Rise. unglued

Member-Dallago Profit-Picks Alert This Week: ANDL ANDL is our hot pick this weekend it is a brand new public company that is making money and is on the move. So be aware of this alert and we recommend this company highly be sure to get in early there is a large campaign going over the

Processing of apache_1.3.34-1_i386.changes

apache_1.3.34-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: apache_1.3.34-1.dsc apache_1.3.34.orig.tar.gz apache_1.3.34-1.diff.gz apache-doc_1.3.34-1_all.deb apache-dev_1.3.34-1_all.deb apache_1.3.34-1_i386.deb apache-ssl_1.3.34-1_i386.deb

apache2_2.0.55-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: apache2-common_2.0.55-1_i386.deb to pool/main/a/apache2/apache2-common_2.0.55-1_i386.deb apache2-doc_2.0.55-1_all.deb to pool/main/a/apache2/apache2-doc_2.0.55-1_all.deb apache2-mpm-perchild_2.0.55-1_i386.deb to pool/main/a/apache2/apache2-mpm-perchild_2.0.55-1_i386.deb

apache_1.3.34-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: apache-common_1.3.34-1_i386.deb to pool/main/a/apache/apache-common_1.3.34-1_i386.deb apache-dbg_1.3.34-1_i386.deb to pool/main/a/apache/apache-dbg_1.3.34-1_i386.deb apache-dev_1.3.34-1_all.deb to pool/main/a/apache/apache-dev_1.3.34-1_all.deb apache-doc_1.3.34-1_all.deb to

Bug#281379: marked as done (apache 1.3.31-7 debconf Italian l10n)

Your message dated Sat, 22 Oct 2005 18:47:07 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#281379: fixed in apache 1.3.34-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#303076: marked as done (apache2-common: false logic in /etc/init.d/apache2 in deciding which PidFile directive is being used)

Your message dated Sat, 22 Oct 2005 18:47:11 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#303076: fixed in apache2 2.0.55-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#316642: marked as done (apache-perl: Please recompile Apache-perl with latest Perl libraries)

Your message dated Sat, 22 Oct 2005 18:47:07 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#316642: fixed in apache 1.3.34-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#328212: marked as done (apache did segfault on Alpha)

Your message dated Sat, 22 Oct 2005 18:47:07 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#328212: fixed in apache 1.3.34-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#327269: marked as done (apache2 security update breaks ssl+svn)

Your message dated Sat, 22 Oct 2005 18:47:11 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#327269: fixed in apache2 2.0.55-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#321824: marked as done (apache-utils: Dummy package still needed?)

Your message dated Sat, 22 Oct 2005 18:47:07 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#321824: fixed in apache 1.3.34-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#331741: marked as done (apache2 depends on debconf without | debconf-2.0 alternate; blocks cdebconf transition)

Your message dated Sat, 22 Oct 2005 18:47:11 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#331741: fixed in apache2 2.0.55-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#332791: marked as done (error: `PEM_F_DEF_CALLBACK' undeclared )

Your message dated Sat, 22 Oct 2005 18:47:11 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#332791: fixed in apache2 2.0.55-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#334336: marked as done (apache: FTBFS with openssl 0.9.8: EVP_F_EVP_DECRYPTFINAL undeclared)

Your message dated Sat, 22 Oct 2005 18:47:07 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#334336: fixed in apache 1.3.34-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#333363: marked as done (apache2-utils: apach2-utils depends on libssl0.9.7(not installable))

Your message dated Sat, 22 Oct 2005 18:47:11 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#63: fixed in apache2 2.0.55-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#307665: marked as done (apache2-common: Directories of 'FILES' listed in apache2-manpage are incorrect.)

Your message dated Sat, 22 Oct 2005 22:02:08 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#307665: fixed in apache2 2.0.55-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#251800: marked as done ([PATCH] apr_table_overlap doesn't work as advertised)

Your message dated Sat, 22 Oct 2005 22:02:08 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#251800: fixed in apache2 2.0.55-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#332619: marked as done (wrong pathes in apache2-manpage)

Your message dated Sat, 22 Oct 2005 22:02:08 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#332619: fixed in apache2 2.0.55-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#311317: marked as done (apache2: The DocumentRoot should be specified without a trailing slash.)

Your message dated Sat, 22 Oct 2005 22:02:08 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#311317: fixed in apache2 2.0.55-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#316477: marked as done (apache2-mpm-worker fails to execute any CGIs!)

Your message dated Sat, 22 Oct 2005 22:02:08 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#316477: fixed in apache2 2.0.55-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

apache2_2.0.55-2_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: apache2-common_2.0.55-2_i386.deb to pool/main/a/apache2/apache2-common_2.0.55-2_i386.deb apache2-doc_2.0.55-2_all.deb to pool/main/a/apache2/apache2-doc_2.0.55-2_all.deb apache2-mpm-perchild_2.0.55-2_i386.deb to pool/main/a/apache2/apache2-mpm-perchild_2.0.55-2_i386.deb