On 8/16/07, Gunnar Wolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Should we hijack/adopt the package, or will its current maintainers
stand up and get it back to life?
- Is there somebody who wants to lead this?
- Pkg-perl and/or Apache groups: Do you agree? :)
- In any other case: Other takers?
I think
On Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 09:32:30PM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
- Should we hijack/adopt the package, or will its current maintainers
stand up and get it back to life?
- Is there somebody who wants to lead this?
- Pkg-perl and/or Apache groups: Do you agree? :)
- In any other case: Other
On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 06:58:02 +0200
Steinar H. Gunderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 09:32:30PM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
Of course, before any action, I'd like to hear Thom's or Andres' points
of view.
You probably want to hear my input too. :-)
At Debconf5, I was
* Adam Conrad ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
On Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 09:32:30PM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
- Should we hijack/adopt the package, or will its current maintainers
stand up and get it back to life?
- Is there somebody who wants to lead this?
- Pkg-perl and/or Apache groups:
* Adam Conrad ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
The debian-apache group has both the necssary perl, apache, and C skills
required to maintain this, what we're lacking at times (hey, check the
apache changelogs for my name recently... *sigh*) is the time.
I'd be happy to see it in the debian-apache
apache2_2.0.54-5sarge2_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
apache2_2.0.54-5sarge2.dsc
apache2_2.0.54-5sarge2.diff.gz
apache2-mpm-threadpool_2.0.54-5sarge2_all.deb
apache2-doc_2.0.54-5sarge2_all.deb
apache2-common_2.0.54-5sarge2_i386.deb
Gunnar Wolf dijo [Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 09:32:30PM -0500]:
Hi all,
(...)
I'm sending this mail as an answer to #438168 - A user
(understandably) fed up by what seems to be lack of attention to a
package that is core to many people's work, libapache2-mod-perl2. I
send this mail with some fear,
7 matches
Mail list logo
