Re: Bug#230143: php4-imap - depends against apache modul, breaks cgi installs

2004-01-30 Thread Steve Langasek
doing hell a lot of time for php4 brokness. If apache fails to install, that's an apache bug, not a php4-imap bug. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer On Fri, 30 Jan 2004, Steve Langasek wrote: reassign 230143 apache thanks On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 10:53:58AM +0100, Bastian Blank

Re: Bug#205553: Backtrace php4-imap/apache SEGV

2004-02-01 Thread Steve Langasek
guess that stack trace is useless and just plain wrong? I wouldn't trust any of the reported stack contents in this case as indicating the actual source of the bug, no. Regards, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Processed: Re: Bug#259211: apache segfault after upgrade from woody

2004-07-14 Thread Steve Langasek
working on this problem. Please talk to them directly. Er, Goto, http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77 lists you as the responsible? -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer

Bug#301819: apache2: FTBS on sarge

2005-03-28 Thread Steve Langasek
here? Are you passing non-standard CFLAGS on the commandline? -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#335438: libsvncpp-dev and libapr0-dev cannot be installed together

2005-10-25 Thread Steve Langasek
subversion package to reach testing first for the imlib transition before uploads are made to try to fix this. - -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED

Bug#335438: libsvncpp-dev and libapr0-dev cannot be installed together

2005-10-25 Thread Steve Langasek
to libdb4.3? -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#336651: libapr0: Need to compile --with-devrandom=/dev/urandom

2005-10-31 Thread Steve Langasek
, and the Debian packages should not sacrifice security casually. - -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -BEGIN PGP

Bug#344481: Mysterious crash in php4-rrdtool

2005-12-22 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 02:44:21AM +0100, Artur R. Czechowski wrote: On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 04:45:25PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 01:09:31AM +0100, Artur R. Czechowski wrote: The rrd_graph_options() gets a string with parameters. The begin if this string

Bug#358543: apache: fails to install

2006-03-22 Thread Steve Langasek
apache (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Errors were encountered while processing: apache E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) No one else seems to be having this problem. What version are you trying to install? -- Steve

Bug#390893: apache2-common pre-removal script error (undefined symbol: apr_get_userid)

2006-10-03 Thread Steve Langasek
apache2-common's prerm script due to the ABI mismatch. I think a Pre-Depends on apache2.2-common is going to be needed here to preserve the necessary unpack order. In any event, it can't be fixed in apache2-common, since that's the package that's been removed. :) -- Steve Langasek

Bug#390823: apache2-common cannot be purged.

2006-10-05 Thread Steve Langasek
On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 09:11:04AM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote: So it's my recommendation to downgrade and wontfix this bug, since there's no way to fix apache2-common's postrm script after the fact without introducing a dummy package that re-breaks our dependency logic. Oh, alternatively

Bug#390823: apache2-common cannot be purged.

2006-10-05 Thread Steve Langasek
/var/lib/dpkg/info/apache2-common.postrm by hand, which is also irritating but not that rare in the history of Debian either. :-P Cheers, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL

Bug#391094: packaging errors remove old apache2 but prevent install of apache2.2

2006-10-05 Thread Steve Langasek
... -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject

Bug#392058: apache2.2-common: apache fails to start

2006-10-10 Thread Steve Langasek
warrant an RC severity on its own.. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL

Bug#397539: apache2-mpm-prefork: apache2 no longer works after upgrade (Invalid command 'DAVLockDB')

2006-11-07 Thread Steve Langasek
/apache2/modules/mod_dav.so shows no mention of this DAVLockDB command; it appears to be defined only by mod_dav_fs.so, so presumably this command needs to be moved to dav_fs.conf. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set

Bug#397539: apache2-mpm-prefork: apache2 no longer works after upgrade (Invalid command 'DAVLockDB')

2006-11-08 Thread Steve Langasek
severity 397539 important thanks On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 08:56:06AM -0600, Peter Samuelson wrote: [Steve Langasek] Forcing reload of web server (apache2)...Syntax error on line 1 of /etc/apache2/mods-enabled/dav.conf: Invalid command 'DAVLockDB', perhaps misspelled or defined

Bug#397310: followup

2006-11-09 Thread Steve Langasek
, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe

Bug#397886: apache2.2-common: non wanted behaviour during upgrade: charset MUST not be created without user consent

2006-11-10 Thread Steve Langasek
of the apache2.2-common package, which is a rename of apache2-common. dpkg can't detect such package name changes as upgrades. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED

Bug#464930: ssl-cert: please use 'hostname -f' in /usr/sbin/make-ssl-cert

2008-02-09 Thread Steve Langasek
actually maintained today? I notice that the maintainer is listed as Debian Apache Maintainers, and that none of the uploaders listed have been active in Apache maintenance for some time... Cheers, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer

Bug#619179: apr-util: please wipe out dependency_libs from .la files (Policy 10.2)

2011-03-21 Thread Steve Langasek
, and that means the .la files referenced here are going to *move* soon, causing build failures for anything using libtool to build against apr-util. As long as apr-util is going to need a rebuild to fix up the invalid .la references, it would be nice to get rid of them altogether. Thanks, -- Steve

Bug#619179: apr-util: please wipe out dependency_libs from .la files (Policy 10.2)

2011-03-21 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 10:00:37PM +0100, Stefan Fritsch wrote: version: 1.3.10+dfsg-1 On Monday 21 March 2011, Steve Langasek wrote: The attached patch has just been applied to the Ubuntu apr-util package, to null out the dependency_libs field in the libtool .la files being shipped

Bug#666260: apr-util: Please drop obsolete versioned build-dependency on binutils

2012-03-29 Thread Steve Langasek
version of binutils - one satisfied by lenny and later. This versioned build-dependency confuses cross-architecture dependency resolution. I think it's best if it's just dropped from the package. Please find attached a patch to do this. Cheers, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long

Bug#1061894: apr: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-01-29 Thread Steve Langasek
. + + -- Steve Langasek Tue, 30 Jan 2024 00:57:09 + + apr (1.7.2-3) unstable; urgency=medium * Add more fixes for atomics from upstream, in particular for diff -Nru apr-1.7.2/debian/control apr-1.7.2/debian/control --- apr-1.7.2/debian/control2023-02-03 16:18:13.0 + +++ apr

Bug#1061893: apr-util: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-01-29 Thread Steve Langasek
. + * Rename libraries for 64-bit time_t transition. + + -- Steve Langasek Tue, 30 Jan 2024 00:55:31 + + apr-util (1.6.3-1) unstable; urgency=medium [ Stefan Fritsch ] diff -Nru apr-util-1.6.3/debian/control apr-util-1.6.3/debian/control --- apr-util-1.6.3/debian/control 2023-02-02 22:42

Bug#1061894: apr: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-01-30 Thread Steve Langasek
time_t transition. + * Fix uninstallable packages from the previous upload. + + -- Steve Langasek Wed, 31 Jan 2024 06:04:49 + + apr (1.7.2-3) unstable; urgency=medium * Add more fixes for atomics from upstream, in particular for diff -Nru apr-1.7.2/debian/control apr-1.7.2/debian/control

Bug#1061893: apr-util: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-01-30 Thread Steve Langasek
. + * Rename libraries for 64-bit time_t transition. + * Fix uninstallable packages from the previous upload. + + -- Steve Langasek Wed, 31 Jan 2024 05:58:19 + + apr-util (1.6.3-1) unstable; urgency=medium [ Stefan Fritsch ] diff -Nru apr-util-1.6.3/debian/control apr-util-1.6.3/debian

Bug#1061894: apr: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-02-27 Thread Steve Langasek
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +apr (1.7.2-3.1) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Rename libraries for 64-bit time_t transition. Closes: #1061894 + + -- Steve Langasek Wed, 28 Feb 2024 01:17:18 + + apr (1.7.2-3) unstable; urgency=medium * Add more fixes for atomics from

Bug#1061893: apr-util: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-02-27 Thread Steve Langasek
01:16:25.0 + @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +apr-util (1.6.3-1.1) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Rename libraries for 64-bit time_t transition. Closes: #1061893 + + -- Steve Langasek Wed, 28 Feb 2024 01:16:25 + + apr-util (1.6.3-1) unstable; urgency=medium

Bug#1061894: apr: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-03-08 Thread Steve Langasek
at 01:17:59AM +, Steve Langasek wrote: > Dear maintainer, > > Please find attached a final version of this patch for the time_t > transition. This patch is being uploaded to unstable. > > Note that this adds a versioned build-dependency on dpkg-dev, to guard > against