Bug#340538: followup on this bug?

2006-07-16 Thread Steinar H. Gunderson
On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 09:29:20AM +0100, Thom May wrote: This is in progress with upstream; we've worked with them to remove zb.c from the upstream repository and are working to find a reasonable solution to the RSA licensed files. FWIW, a reasonable usable replacement for the MD5 functions

Bug#340538: followup on this bug?

2006-05-31 Thread Thom May
* Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : This RC bug has been open since November with no maintainer followup that I can see. Is anything being done to remove the problimatic files and/or get them properly licensed upstream? This is in progress with upstream; we've worked with them to remove