Version: 2.2.3-1~exp.r170
tag 236193 - fixed
tag 238586 - fixed
tag 241223 - fixed
tag 273929 - fixed
tag 285337 - fixed
tag 337817 - fixed
tag 340538 - fixed
tag 340955 - fixed
tag 341460 - fixed
tag 343467 - fixed
tag 344072 - fixed
tag 348189 - fixed
tag 353443 - fixed
tag 368497 - fixed
tag
Your message dated Wed, 16 Aug 2006 14:02:31 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Fixed in NMU of apache2 2.2.3-1~exp.r170
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
* Now talking in #debian-apache
* Topic is ' Welcome to #debian-apache - discussions about the packaging
of 2.x in Debian | For support please visit #apache on Freenode |
apache2.2 hosted on svn.debian.org | APR/APU 1.2.7 uploaded to unstable '
* Set by thom on Fri Jul 21 22:23:03
XTF Hi,
XTF
Thom May wrote:
Please stop abusing the BTS with irrelevancies.
-Thom
Could you start using the BTS with relevancies in return?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please stop abusing the BTS with irrelevancies.
-Thom
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tuesday 08 August 2006 08:06, Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
could you please give us a status update about the apache 2.2
packages?
Are there realistic chances to get 2.2 into etch? If yes, are
preliminary packets available somewhere?
If no, we should go for 2.0.59. There have been quite a few
Hi Thom,
* Thom May wrote:
2.2 is awaiting some final polish and will then be uploaded to
experimental some time in the next couple of weeks.
could you please give us a status update about the apache 2.2
packages?
Thanks, Norbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Package: apache2
Version: 2.0.55-4
Followup-For: Bug #344072
Dear valued maintainers,
i just want to politely ask, whether you have (hopefully positive) news for
us honestly grateful apache2-package-users, means regarding either Apache
2.0.58 (which fixes serious security issues) or even
Thom May wrote:
* Olaf van der Spek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
What's the name of those packages?
I don't think the bug tracking system is a suitable place to teach you how
to use apt.
You're right.
What about Apache 2.2 itself?
--
Olaf van der Spek
http://xccu.sf.net/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
How's the Apache 2.2 effort going? Can I lend a hand? I need Apache
2.2 for work and it would be a shame to build from source if I can
help the Debian Apache 2.2 effort instead.
[Please Cc me on any reply; thanks.]
--
Andrew Stribblehill [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Senior Systems Programmer, IT Service,
Hello, Debian Apache team,
Any news on Apache 2.2? No words since December makes people worried...
--
With best regards,
Alexander mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
Thom May wrote:
* Olaf van der Spek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
Hi Adam,
We're well aware of this, and are actually planning to have a small
gathering in the new year to polish up the apr1.0/apache2.2 packaging
and get it into the archive.
What's the status of 2.2?
APR/APU 1.2 are in
Hi Adam,
We're well aware of this, and are actually planning to have a small
gathering in the new year to polish up the apr1.0/apache2.2 packaging
and get it into the archive.
What's the status of 2.2?
--
Olaf van der Spek
http://xccu.sf.net/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Olaf van der Spek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
Hi Adam,
We're well aware of this, and are actually planning to have a small
gathering in the new year to polish up the apr1.0/apache2.2 packaging
and get it into the archive.
What's the status of 2.2?
APR/APU 1.2 are in unstable. 2.2 is
Package: apache2
Version: 2.0.54-5
Severity: wishlist
Apache 2.2 has recently been released:
http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/Announcement2.2.html
It brings quite a few new features and AFAICT also fixes some of the
bugs that are in the Debian BTS, so packaging it would probably be a
good
15 matches
Mail list logo