On Wed, Sep 15, 2004 at 07:25:11PM +0100, Thom May wrote:
u-a-m is a work in process, which will be the standard way of handling
modules.
It's pretty close, but not there yet. I'm hoping to have some time the next
couple of days to work on it and test it etc.
I'd really ask you *not* to go
On Wed, Sep 15, 2004 at 02:52:28AM +0100, Thom May wrote:
libapache2-mod-macro is pretty much the simplest possible case for an
apache2 module.
get the source for that, and run with it.
I'm not looking for the easiest package example, I already looked at
many, but I wan't to find the best way
* Emmanuel Lacour ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
On Wed, Sep 15, 2004 at 02:52:28AM +0100, Thom May wrote:
libapache2-mod-macro is pretty much the simplest possible case for an
apache2 module.
get the source for that, and run with it.
I'm not looking for the easiest package example, I
Hi everybody,
I'm working on packaging a new apache module for apache/apache2
(www.suphp.org), and I try to find the best way for my postinsts/prerms
scripts. I found the README.modules in apache-dev, but nothing for
apache2-dev. So I looked at some other packages and saw that often they
simply
* Emmanuel Lacour ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
Hi everybody,
I'm working on packaging a new apache module for apache/apache2
(www.suphp.org), and I try to find the best way for my postinsts/prerms
scripts. I found the README.modules in apache-dev, but nothing for
apache2-dev. So I looked at
5 matches
Mail list logo
