On Fri, 19 Nov 2004, Alexis Sukrieh wrote:
I'm maintaining an unofficial package, apache-lingerd [1].
It's a new flavour of the official Debian apache source tree.
it's been more than 4 years since i last had to remember all the details
surrounding linger... but the main reason apache does
* dean gaudet
| On Sun, 21 Nov 2004, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
|
| As personal opinion I need to agree with Tollef, that apache1.3 is
| basically a dead package and it might get removed from Debian
| after Sarge is released. That means providing only security
| support to it.
|
|
* Tollef Fog Heen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) disait :
There's not really any point in doing much work on the apache 1
branch. Apache 1 is dead upstream (or, low activity security-fixes
only-mode) and will be orphaned by the Debian maintainers once Sarge
is out the door
Yes, things are sounding like
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alexis Sukrieh wrote:
| Hello there.
|
| I'm maintaining an unofficial package, apache-lingerd [1].
| It's a new flavour of the official Debian apache source tree.
|
| As it won't be included in Debian, and as some users requested me
| to maintain the
Alexis Sukrieh wrote:
Reading the INSTALL file of lingerd, only mod_ssl would need a
particular patch, so we could imagine an apache-ssl-lingerd flavour.
As there is an apache-perl flavour we also might think to an
apache-perl-lingerd flavour.
Better off just having users install
* Adam Conrad ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) disait :
Adding three new flavours for the sake of one piece of functionality
is a support nightmare. Notice that there's no apache-ssl-perl
package either.
Right. I completely agree with that (note that all my work is focused
on apache-lingerd.
Fabio
Hello there.
I'm maintaining an unofficial package, apache-lingerd [1].
It's a new flavour of the official Debian apache source tree.
As it won't be included in Debian, and as some users requested me
to maintain the package against the last sid packages, I'm a little bit
confused :
- If I make
7 matches
Mail list logo
