GPM not working

2001-02-23 Thread Pankaj Mittal
Hi, I am running Linux-2.4 on my CLPS7500FE board. I have downloaded GPM binary from debian site and installed it. When I run GPM using following command, gpm shows up for some time and then ends. start-stop-daemon --start -quiet --exec /usr/sbin/gpm -- -R -m /dev/psaux -t ps2 -r 15 -Rms

Re: Unremovable broken package

2001-02-23 Thread Patrice LaFlamme
On Sat, Feb 24, 2001 at 01:11:05AM + or thereabouts, Peter Naulls wrote: > How about this? > > http://cgi.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_contents.pl?word=update-fonts&case=insensitive&version=stable&arch=arm&directories=yes maybe I just searched in unstable Can't remember (already!? heh ) Th

Re: esd

2001-02-23 Thread Peter Naulls
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Philip Blundell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > sound.o: In function `sound_cache': > sound.o(.text+0x44): undefined reference to `esd_sample_free' > sound.o: In function `sound_playsound': > sound.o(.text+0xc4): undefined reference to `esd_sample_play' > coll

Re: Unremovable broken package

2001-02-23 Thread Peter Naulls
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Patrice LaFlamme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 09:39:25PM + or thereabouts, Peter Naulls wrote: > > > ok, so if I remove gsfonts-x11.* from /var/lib/dpkg/info, i can remove > > > it. Now when I > > > install the new package, I st

Re: Unremovable broken package

2001-02-23 Thread Patrice LaFlamme
On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 09:39:25PM + or thereabouts, Peter Naulls wrote: > > ok, so if I remove gsfonts-x11.* from /var/lib/dpkg/info, i can remove it. > > Now when I > > install the new package, I still get the same message about > > update-fonts-scale. Which > > package contains update-fon

Re: other failed packages

2001-02-23 Thread Peter Naulls
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Philip Blundell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > otherosfs/cdrdao_1:1.1.4-2 by builddwb [extra:out-of-date] > Reasons for failing: > [Category: none] > c++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -D_THREAD_SAFE -D_REENTRANT -DVERSION=\"1.1.4\" > -DDRIVE > R_TABLE_FILE=\"

Re: updated libc6, perl and apt packages?

2001-02-23 Thread Philip Blundell
>Any chance of updated glibc, perl and apt packages? glibc's had a minor >revision bump (2.2.1-1 to 2.2.2-1), perl's had a major reorganisation, and >well, apt finally got released. I'm doing perl at the moment. Glibc is built but I haven't uploaded it yet -- after the debacle with libc 2.2.1 it

Re: other failed packages

2001-02-23 Thread Philip Blundell
Peter Naulls wrote: >How much detail do you want on each package - like this? >More/nothing/don't care? About that much is fine. Thanks for the investigation. p.

Re: other failed packages

2001-02-23 Thread Peter Naulls
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Philip Blundell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > math/apcalc_2.11.2t1.0-1 by buildd [optional:out-of-date] > Reasons for failing: > [Category: none] > gcc -Wall -Wno-implicit -Wno-comment -O2 -g3 -D_REENTRANT -c -o > file.o f > ile.c > file

falselogin

2001-02-23 Thread Peter Naulls
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Philip Blundell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > utils/falselogin_0.2-2 by buildd [optional:out-of-date] > Reasons for failing: > [Category: none] > gcc -Wall -c falselogin.c > falselogin.c:5: publib.h: No such file or directory > make[1]: ***

gnupg

2001-02-23 Thread Philip Blundell
This kind of thing (from longlong.h) is never good news. Someone probably needs to figure out what the `arm3' version is doing and why it doesn't work on armv4. (It ought not to be using explicit hard registers either.) /* SAM This does not work on arm4 */ #define umul_ppmm(xh, xl, a, b) \ _

esd

2001-02-23 Thread Philip Blundell
I'm seeing quite a lot of this kind of thing: checking for gnorba libraries... yes checking for esd-config... /usr/bin/esd-config checking for ESD - version >= 0.2.5... yes checking how to run the C preprocessor... gcc -E [...] gcc -Wall -O2 -o gtetrinet client.o commands.o config.o dialogs.o f

Re: ruby

2001-02-23 Thread Adam C Powell IV
Philip Blundell wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Adam C Powell IV writes: > >Is anyone else having this problem? If not, any clues as to what might be > >going > >wrong? If nobody else is having this problem, I really don't want to file an > >important bug against gnupg... > > Yes, it w

Re: ruby

2001-02-23 Thread Philip Blundell
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Adam C Powell IV writes: >Is anyone else having this problem? If not, any clues as to what might be >going >wrong? If nobody else is having this problem, I really don't want to file an >important bug against gnupg... Yes, it was certainly broken last time I tried

RE: 164sx PROBLEMS

2001-02-23 Thread Leandro Dutra
> From: Anish Patel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > with out a problem. This is on a 164SX that's booting and EB > variant kernel > from the SRM console. Isn't this an Alpha problem? --_  / \  Leandro Guimarães Faria Corsetti Dutra +55 (11) 246 96 07 resl  \ /  Amdocs Brasil Lt

Re: ruby

2001-02-23 Thread Adam C Powell IV
Philip Blundell wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Peter Naulls writes: > >Done. What's next? :-) > > Well, looking at the dep-wait rollcall, there are a lot of packages stuck > waiting for libsdl-mixer-dev, libmysqlclient10-dev, libgnomeprint-dev and > libgtk1.2-dev(1.2.8-1); also, virtual

164sx PROBLEMS

2001-02-23 Thread Anish Patel
Can anyone help me out. I am thinking there has to be something wrong with the IDE driver in the Linux Kernels. every time I try to install I get an error about lost interrupt and also that the cd-rom can't decode or something of that sort. the only reason I think it is the kernel is because I ca

Re: quinn-diff

2001-02-23 Thread Philip Blundell
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, James Troup writes: >Err, perhaps I'm missing the obvious, but last time I checked, arm was >supported? Sorry, I was obviously still asleep when I wrote that. I meant non-US, not arm. p.

Re: quinn-diff

2001-02-23 Thread James Troup
Philip Blundell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >I'm looking into setting up a quinn-diff somewhere on armlinux.org, > >as that seems to be common practice. If this isn't going to be > >helpful, stop me. > > I don't think that would buy us much; we aren't being seriously hampered by > quinn probl

Re: other failed packages

2001-02-23 Thread Peter Naulls
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Philip Blundell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > interpreters/clisp_2000-03-06-2 by buildd [optional:uncompiled] > Reasons for failing: > [Category: none] > needs ARM port? > . Odd. A RISC OS port has existed for many years - this doesn't

other failed packages

2001-02-23 Thread Philip Blundell
Some more packages that have been sitting in `failed' for a while and could do with investigation: admin/divine_0.7.2-2 by builddwb [optional:out-of-date] Reasons for failing: [Category: none] BPF still all messed up, no idea what's wrong utils/falselogin_0.2-2 by buildd [optional:out-

Re: kernel images

2001-02-23 Thread Peter Naulls
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > The kernel images in the archive are somewhat outdated. Unless anybody > objects, I plan to upload the latest 2.2.18 from lkab to both potato and > woody > (this is what the potato boot-floppies currently expects for ARM). > A bit minor perhaps - T

kernel images

2001-02-23 Thread Philip Blundell
The kernel images in the archive are somewhat outdated. Unless anybody objects, I plan to upload the latest 2.2.18 from lkab to both potato and woody (this is what the potato boot-floppies currently expects for ARM). p.

Re: ruby

2001-02-23 Thread Philip Blundell
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Peter Naulls writes: >Done. What's next? :-) Well, looking at the dep-wait rollcall, there are a lot of packages stuck waiting for libsdl-mixer-dev, libmysqlclient10-dev, libgnomeprint-dev and libgtk1.2-dev(1.2.8-1); also, virtually the whole of KDE is waiting fo

Re: ruby

2001-02-23 Thread Peter Naulls
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Philip Blundell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Peter Naulls wrote: > >Yes, that certainly seems to have fixed it - it's build the rest of it > >now, and the values it's returing are sensible. > > Great. Would you file a bug report? Done. What's next? :-)

Re: quinn-diff

2001-02-23 Thread Philip Blundell
>I'm looking into setting up a quinn-diff somewhere on armlinux.org, >as that seems to be common practice. If this isn't going to be >helpful, stop me. I don't think that would buy us much; we aren't being seriously hampered by quinn problems at the moment. Better to spend your time moving wann

Re: ruby

2001-02-23 Thread Philip Blundell
Peter Naulls wrote: >Yes, that certainly seems to have fixed it - it's build the rest of it >now, and the values it's returing are sensible. Great. Would you file a bug report? Thanks p.