I can't claim credit for finding this - Robin Watts tracked this one down.
void *memset(void *s, int c, size_t n);
isn't masking the second parameter to a byte.
Test code:
#include
#include
int main () {
char fred[16];
int i = 0;
memset(fred, 256, sizeof(fred));
while (i <
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Adam C Powell IV) writes:
> As we say in New York, "Akhaa!" The problem seems to be serial
> permissions: my Debian Intel, PPC and Alpha boxes all have root.dialout
> 660 for /dev/ttyS*, but the Netwinder has root.root 640.
>
> Is there a reason for this? Or is this a maked
Adam C Powell IV wrote:
Greetings,
Does anyone have gnome-pilot working on a Netwinder? (Has anyone
tried? :-) I can't get it to start to sync, the pilot times out in
the first stage when gnome-pilot is waiting to send the new name and ID.
As we say in New York, "Akhaa!" The problem seems to b
hi,
On Fri, Nov 02, 2001 at 01:27:09PM +0100, Sven wrote:
> BVut aren't the build daemons supposed to fill a bug if this is the case, at
> least that is what the m68k autobuilders dom and also the sparc one, i think,
> at least i received lmails from them in the past.
uh, the mechanism is like th
Sven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> BVut aren't the build daemons supposed to fill a bug if this is the
> case, at least that is what the m68k autobuilders dom and also the
> sparc one, i think, at least i received lmails from them in the
> past.
build daemons don't file bugs, humans do. overwork
hi,
On Fri, Nov 02, 2001 at 01:36:36PM +0100, Sven wrote:
> Should i redo a package (lablgl-0.95-3) and have all the subarches rebuild
> just because sparc and maybe arm did build the package with the wrong version
> of ocaml ?
maybe you need versioned build-depends? or something similar and
look
On Fri, Nov 02, 2001 at 11:06:39AM +0100, Othmar Pasteka wrote:
> hi,
>
> On Fri, Nov 02, 2001 at 10:53:36AM +0100, Sven wrote:
> > I am the maintainer of, under others, the lablgtk package, which altough
> > uploaded to unstable on september the 24, is not yet built on either arm or
> > sparc, an
On Fri, Nov 02, 2001 at 11:06:39AM +0100, Othmar Pasteka wrote:
> hi,
>
> On Fri, Nov 02, 2001 at 10:53:36AM +0100, Sven wrote:
> > I am the maintainer of, under others, the lablgtk package, which altough
> > uploaded to unstable on september the 24, is not yet built on either arm or
> > sparc, an
hi,
On Fri, Nov 02, 2001 at 10:53:36AM +0100, Sven wrote:
> I am the maintainer of, under others, the lablgtk package, which altough
> uploaded to unstable on september the 24, is not yet built on either arm or
> sparc, and thus there is no version of lablgtk in woody.
uh, check buildd.debian.org
Hello, ...
I am the maintainer of, under others, the lablgtk package, which altough
uploaded to unstable on september the 24, is not yet built on either arm or
sparc, and thus there is no version of lablgtk in woody.
Is there a reason for lablgtk not being available on arm or sparc ? If so, it
wo
10 matches
Mail list logo
