Stable (w/ 2.4.x) upgrade to Testing(w/ 2.6.x) ?

2004-01-26 Thread James
Peter Naulls wrote: Alternatively, you should try apt-get dist-upgrade This brings up a good question. I already have a portable(Prostar 8880 x86) running woody (stable) with several kernel options, the latest being 2.4.21. If I want to upgrade to Sarge(testing) and a 2.6.x kernel, do I upgrade

Re: Abysmal clock chip on netwinder?

2004-01-26 Thread Adrian von Bidder
On Monday 26 January 2004 13:50, Ralph Siemsen wrote: > On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 09:44:19PM +0100, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder wrote: > > Is anythin known about the builtin clock on netwinders? After a short > > time running, ntpd runs away and ends up detecting all available time > > sour

Re: Applying Debian glibc patches on a non-Debian machine

2004-01-26 Thread Philip Blundell
On Sun, 2004-01-25 at 16:26, Stuart Winter wrote: > # Delete non-ARM patches: > ( cd debian/patches > rm -rf *cvs* *sparc* *alpha* *s390* *mips* *hppa* *m68k* *?86* *powerpc* > ) The patches are often interdependent. You must apply all of them, particularly the -cvs ones. p.

Re: Abysmal clock chip on netwinder?

2004-01-26 Thread Ralph Siemsen
On Mon, Jan 26, 2004 at 02:20:02PM +0100, Adrian von Bidder wrote: > > Hmm. Seems good enough right now. I had it running 4 hours at least > yesterday, > and during that time the clock ran away 2000ms. Now it's been stable for the > last 2h (offset <1ms to the local timeserver). *shrug*. Hmm,

Re: Abysmal clock chip on netwinder?

2004-01-26 Thread Ralph Siemsen
On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 09:44:19PM +0100, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder wrote: > > Is anythin known about the builtin clock on netwinders? After a short time > running, ntpd runs away and ends up detecting all available time sources as > falsetickers or unavailable, and the frequency runni

Re: No arm machine reporting to popularty-contest?

2004-01-26 Thread Lars Brinkhoff
Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Clinging to sanity, Petter Reinholdtsen mumbled in his beard: > > I think it would be nice if someone with an arm host would report as > > well. I do not longer have my netwinder operational, so I can't. :) > # apt-get install pop

Re: Applying Debian glibc patches on a non-Debian machine

2004-01-26 Thread Stuart Winter
On Mon, 26 Jan 2004, Philip Blundell wrote: > The patches are often interdependent. You must apply all of them, > particularly the -cvs ones. I did also try patching without deleting the non-ARM named patch files. However, I *think* that the problem is that some of the patches require patch -p0

Re: Debian testing/unstable on RiscPC ?

2004-01-26 Thread Peter Naulls
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Peter Teichmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I have an Acorn RiscPC running Debian 3.0, and I would like to upgrade it to > at least testing. I tried it with a method I found to work on x86 and mips: > > * install a minimum Debian 3.0 on another