Re: armel boxes for Debian

2008-02-20 Thread dann frazier
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 07:44:30PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: > Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > > We could just declare arm a second-class architecture for security updates, > > i.e. DSAs being released once all archs are available except arm and arm > > updates being released once available. For small to

Re: armel boxes for Debian

2008-02-20 Thread Joey Hess
Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > We could just declare arm a second-class architecture for security updates, > i.e. DSAs being released once all archs are available except arm and arm > updates being released once available. For small to medium packages most > updates would still be released in sync, si

Re: armel boxes for Debian

2008-02-20 Thread Jason Edgecombe
Joey Hess wrote: Riku Voipio wrote: The security buildd is a different story. Parallell buildd's compiling several packages at time don't help[1], they want single builds completed fast, so they can release security advisories with minimal delay. For this reason, Moritz from the security team

Re: armel boxes for Debian

2008-02-20 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 06:12:10PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: > Riku Voipio wrote: > > The security buildd is a different story. Parallell buildd's compiling > > several packages at time don't help[1], they want single builds > > completed fast, so they can release security advisories with minimal > >

Re: armel boxes for Debian

2008-02-20 Thread Joey Hess
Riku Voipio wrote: > The security buildd is a different story. Parallell buildd's compiling > several packages at time don't help[1], they want single builds > completed fast, so they can release security advisories with minimal > delay. For this reason, Moritz from the security team expressed > be

Re: Status of armel in the archive?

2008-02-20 Thread Paul Brook
> > I now have a functional patch for EABI on v4 processors. I can push it > > out if you're interested. > > I'm exceedingly interested, largely on behalf of people who are using > balloon2 (and thus strongarm) in current production hardware, and > would like to be able to use eabi. > > I can also

Re: Debian on N4100

2008-02-20 Thread Bill Gatliff
Bill Gatliff wrote: The gcc came from crosstool-ng-1.0. Despite my repeated requests, crosstool-ng-1.0 insisted on building gcc-4.2.2. So I built my own gcc-4.1.1, used that to build the _same_ kernel, and the box is now solid. Go figure. If I had more hours in the day, I'd investigate

kernel BUG at fs/inode.c:250!

2008-02-20 Thread u7l11ey
Hi Debian community, I have a Linksys NSLU2 running the latest Debian distribution (just updated 2 days ago): Linux version 2.6.18-6-ixp4xx (Debian 2.6.18.dfsg.1-18etch1). For a couple of days, the box hangs at least once a day, requiring a hard reset by pulling the power chord. The kern.log file