Re: ARM on the ports page

Heyho all! Thanks for your input. As per this discussion (changed wording for arm/armel; dropped armeb), full diff with some changes against the current index.wml below. Can somebody commit this? I don't have commit access to www. cheers -- vbi +++ Index: index.wml =

Re: GCC-4.5 as the default for (at least some) architectures

On 2 March 2011 03:34, Matthias Klose wrote: > I'll make gcc-4.5 the default for (at least some) architectures within the > next > two weeks before more transitions start. GCC-4.5 is already used as the > default > compiler for almost any other distribution, so there shouldn't be many > surprise

GCC-4.5 as the default for (at least some) architectures

I'll make gcc-4.5 the default for (at least some) architectures within the next two weeks before more transitions start. GCC-4.5 is already used as the default compiler for almost any other distribution, so there shouldn't be many surprises on at least the common architectures. About 50% of the b

Re: ARM on the ports page

+++ Steve Langasek [2011-03-01 08:25 -0800]: > On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 03:57:54PM +, Wookey wrote: > > Perhaps add that armhf matches Ubuntu and Linaro 'arm' ports, whilst > > armel in Ubuntu is not the same as armel in Debian? > > Hum, that's confusing and not true in various ways. The Ubunt

Re: ARM on the ports page

On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 03:57:54PM +, Wookey wrote: > Perhaps add that armhf matches Ubuntu and Linaro 'arm' ports, whilst > armel in Ubuntu is not the same as armel in Debian? Hum, that's confusing and not true in various ways. The Ubuntu armel port (there is no Ubuntu 'arm' port) is binary-

Re: ARM on the ports page

+++ Adrian von Bidder [2011-03-01 16:20 +0100]: > Hi, > > > > I proposed a few improvements to the "ports" page on www.d.o, some touching > the ARM status. Well done - it's been old and crufty for a long time. > Since I'm not involve

Re: Bug#615938: Improvements to the "Ports" page: non-linux & arm stuff

Hi, 2011/3/1 Adrian von Bidder : > +++ > diff --git a/webwml/english/ports/index.wml b/webwml/english/ports/index.wml > --- a/webwml/english/ports/index.wml > +++ b/webwml/english/ports/index.wml > @@ -5,7 +5,6 @@ >  Introduction >  Released ports >  Ports that haven't been released yet > - Non-L

ARM on the ports page

Hi, I proposed a few improvements to the "ports" page on www.d.o, some touching the ARM status. Since I'm not involved with porting myself, perhaps some of you may want to comment. I'm especially unsure about the armeb port - it wasn'

Re: Reports of successful Squeeze upgrades

I have now upgraded my nslu2 successfully. There was only one hiccup. The minimal system upgrade went fine, as well as kernel and udev upgrades. During the dist-upgrade, I left the ssh/screen session unattended. When I came back, I could see that the process had completed without any obvious erro